Rise of the dupes? How many dupes this lamtim has ah?

Why so serious?

counselor, please proceed to present your evidence of:

1 accepted the terms of the agreement;
2 detailed all of the essential terms in the agreement;
3 exchanged promises;
4 the capacity to consent; and
5 an intention to form legal relations.

dismissed till next hearing.

2feidei now that LarryPizzaGuy has mentioned about Lamtin, i am seriously wondering if timidandslow is Lamtin because both love to argue and talk about "Fakta".

The only thing which timidandslow hasn't said is this "Come go Balai and settle"

This post has been edited by 2malaysiajib: Dec 24 2019, 12:10 PM

Timidandslow is currently receiving 3rd party advice from one of LamTin.'s dupe whom is actively present in this thread.

and which one is it again ? Have lost track of Lamtins dupe's

u mau tau who is lamtin dupe here?

easy to spot jer....kasi hint, user name start with u......his track is all over this thread

ah starts with u and ends with y......

Has he asked you to meet him at Balai to settle or not ?

tarak...he manyak friendly with ayam.....he think ayam veli fair, non judgmental about him, always gip him benefits of doubts

and, according to him, he is now free man liou, the judge dropped all charges against him, tarak kidnap, tarak extortion......he is innocent.

nice, lost track about the progress of his case.

Anyway, not going anywhere for the holidays ?

menganjing in /k, go troll timidandslow when bored

topkek

Macam bodoh

This whole post is topnotch childish immature. Taking any comment seriously from /k is naive. Having a rant about it in serious /k is outright punde. smh

This post has been edited by sayabolehtoktok: Dec 25 2019, 01:14 AM

Prepare to be disappointed.

We have few unresolved cases in /k like:-

- Run nekkid in klcc

- See tetek Wanie

Until now also no results.

Any cases I missed?

Do not simply use the term "prima facie" if you dont understanding the meaning.

In order to form a valid and binding contract, read properly.

You need to have these in mind:
1. Offer;
2. Acceptance;
3. Consideration; and
4. ITCLR

Between, 'prima facie' is only applicable for criminal case!

Done lecturing

If destiny6 makes a statement or a promise that causes timidandlow to rely on that statement in such a way that timidandlow is financially injured by that reliance, then a court will enforce the statement or promise as if it was a completed contract. The court does not need to find an agreement or consideration in order to enforce the promise like a contract.

Contract 404

Hopeless case

i just want to know how many cases you won in court this way before.

oh wait this ended up in serious k oh well i suppose i have to answer with some seriousness

judicial review dont work this way

you will need evidence to prove that you indeed went up to genting, see s. 101, 102 and 103 of Evidence Act

timid need to show, through evidence, imho, mainly 2 things, 1. there is Texas hold'em poker tables in genting (notwithstanding; (1) the possibility that there are only "Progressive Texas Hold'em Poker games" in genting based on the information made available on genting's official website, (2) that the court may take judicial notice on the fact that Texas hold'em Poker and Progressive Texas Hold'em Poker in 2 distinct game as they are general knowledge on arts and history [i think gambling is an art and part of human history] and (3) therefore both party having made a fundamental mistake as to the fact, i.e. the definition of "texas hold'em poker", the agreement/contract is void s.21 of the Contracts Act) and 2. timid's allegation that he had went up to genting, etc on evidence

all that said, agreement by way of wager like this is void and unenforceable under s.31 of the Contracts Act anyway

while it is true that one may sue based on a promise which forms an oral agreement between parties, hence promissory estoppel, you must still show that you have suffered losses due to the promise as it is one of the key element to mount a suit based on promissory estoppel and the basic principle of evidence still need to be fulfilled
if anything I can only imagine the losses timid would have suffered is his travel expenses up to genting, which he need to prove in evidence, perhaps in form of his gps travel logs/toll payments/hotel expenses if he overnight there/etc

uamcy is known to be lamtin dupe, he loves to quote random legal principle online that he read somewhere and apply it to his favourable/preferred outcome

edit: hanging sentence

This post has been edited by kaemon: Dec 26 2019, 12:21 PM