Dec 26 2019, 12:14 PM
oh well i suppose i have to answer with some seriousnessQUOTE(uamcy @ Dec 23 2019, 04:10 PM)
Maybe you can file a judicial review on the said matter if you have the money.
And you can always initiate a civil suit against destiny6 if you have the money as well.
Timidandslow v Destiny6 [2019]
Good luck ya...
judicial review dont work this way And you can always initiate a civil suit against destiny6 if you have the money as well.
Timidandslow v Destiny6 [2019]
Good luck ya...
QUOTE(uamcy @ Dec 23 2019, 10:01 PM)
No la. This is just a promissory estoppel case. Although there was no valid and binding contract between destiny6 and timidandslow, on the facts of the present case, destiny6 was clearly estopped and precluded from denying that there was a valid and concluded binding contract between the parties.
It's unjust and unconscionable for destiny6 after 11 December 2019 to not honoring his promise.
1) The defendant destiny6 had never informed timidandslow of his so-called condition precedent that Texas hold em must be player vs player
2) Destiny6 had all the time represented to timidandslow and had led timid to believe that he will receive 5k upon proving the texas hold em game is there
3) In reliance thereon and influenced by destiny6's actions and representations, timidandslow had incurred expenses and gone to the great lengths in travelling from his hometown to genting for getting evidence
4) The plaintiff(timidandslow) had told 2feidei that he was in genting on 11 December 2019
5) In short, destiny6 had all the material times actively encouraged timidandslow in kopitiam in his assumption that he will receive 5k upon proving the case
So how timidandslow? Want to file a civil suit against destiny6 or not?
It's unjust and unconscionable for destiny6 after 11 December 2019 to not honoring his promise.
1) The defendant destiny6 had never informed timidandslow of his so-called condition precedent that Texas hold em must be player vs player
2) Destiny6 had all the time represented to timidandslow and had led timid to believe that he will receive 5k upon proving the texas hold em game is there
3) In reliance thereon and influenced by destiny6's actions and representations, timidandslow had incurred expenses and gone to the great lengths in travelling from his hometown to genting for getting evidence
4) The plaintiff(timidandslow) had told 2feidei that he was in genting on 11 December 2019
5) In short, destiny6 had all the material times actively encouraged timidandslow in kopitiam in his assumption that he will receive 5k upon proving the case
So how timidandslow? Want to file a civil suit against destiny6 or not?
QUOTE(timidandslow @ Dec 23 2019, 10:33 PM)
wut ? dude are u retarded ?
[B]YES I did go up to genting[/B]
NO I did not meet destiny
man, you are dumber than a box of bricks , I wonder how you managed to find your way out of the womb.
you will need evidence to prove that you indeed went up to genting, see s. 101, 102 and 103 of Evidence Act[B]YES I did go up to genting[/B]
NO I did not meet destiny
man, you are dumber than a box of bricks , I wonder how you managed to find your way out of the womb.
timid need to show, through evidence, imho, mainly 2 things, 1. there is Texas hold'em poker tables in genting (notwithstanding; (1) the possibility that there are only "Progressive Texas Hold'em Poker games" in genting based on the information made available on genting's official website, (2) that the court may take judicial notice on the fact that Texas hold'em Poker and Progressive Texas Hold'em Poker in 2 distinct game as they are general knowledge on arts and history [i think gambling is an art and part of human history] and (3) therefore both party having made a fundamental mistake as to the fact, i.e. the definition of "texas hold'em poker", the agreement/contract is void s.21 of the Contracts Act) and 2. timid's allegation that he had went up to genting, etc on evidence
all that said, agreement by way of wager like this is void and unenforceable under s.31 of the Contracts Act anyway
while it is true that one may sue based on a promise which forms an oral agreement between parties, hence promissory estoppel, you must still show that you have suffered losses due to the promise as it is one of the key element to mount a suit based on promissory estoppel and the basic principle of evidence still need to be fulfilled
if anything I can only imagine the losses timid would have suffered is his travel expenses up to genting, which he need to prove in evidence, perhaps in form of his gps travel logs/toll payments/hotel expenses if he overnight there/etc
QUOTE(lowya @ Dec 26 2019, 12:02 AM)
i just want to know how many cases you won in court this way before.
uamcy is known to be lamtin dupe, he loves to quote random legal principle online that he read somewhere and apply it to his favourable/preferred outcomeedit: hanging sentence
This post has been edited by kaemon: Dec 26 2019, 12:21 PM
Quote
. Apparently the law firm only have lawyers, and don't hire anyone else for anything but lawyer.
0.0216sec
0.28
6 queries
GZIP Disabled