i present myself as the aggrieved party . i wish to pursue a case against destiny6 for breach of contract. allow me to narrate the sequence of events as i see it:

1. a deal was struck between me and destiny. in layman terms , the T& C of the agreement is as follows:

destiny will pay me the sum of RM5,000 if I can prove that there exists a game called "texas hold em poker" in genting casino.

2. the terms of agreement was laid down and witnessed by a third party , 2feidei.


3. thusly i made my way to genting to obtain proof to support my case. after having obtained said evidence, i departed genting.

4. i then showed my evidence to destiny. however he denied that the evidence fits his requirements. essentially , he demands that only "player vs player" poker is acceptable.
the game which currently exists in genting is "player vs dealer" poker.

5. according to your learned opinion, O wise legal professionals, do i have a case to pursue destiny for breach of contract ?







This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 02:47 PM

reserved

uamcy please comment

you misunderstand my point. i cam easily go up again next week. but destiny will still refuse to honour the bet because according to him, z table with literally the words "texas hold em poker " in its name, isn't actually texas hold em

technically the terms of the bet made no such mention. it only stated "texas hold em poker"

This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 02:52 PM

my dear boy, in case you are blind, i already posted pictures which proved i was up there.

my dear boy, a simple reverse image search would prove you wrong.

anyway you may refer to https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/4873647/+940 for the chronicles of my journey.

also , dont try to pusing here and there. the bet is that he will pay me 5k if i can prove that there is texas hold em at genting.

This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 03:30 PM

i dont understand what you are trying to say. can you post my quote here where i said that ?

can post the relevant excerpt from that long article ?

calling in hksgmy as witness because he knows a bit of the background story

dont jump the gun. i cannot post there because neither goods nor currency has exchanged hands yet. i just want to find out first whether i have just cause to pursue further.

if i get a positive consensus then i will proceed to open a thread there.

thanks 2feidei for confirming to larrypizzaguy , that i did indeed go up to genting and down from genting.

This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 03:39 PM

that's all fine and dandy. my Question is , is "texas hold em poker" really texas hold em or not?

if the answer is NO, then i go up 10 times also useless.

so, don't try to pusing. nowhere in the agreement said that i need to meet face to face. and need i remind you that the T&C was written by you

This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 03:50 PM

he is commenting from the opinion of a gambler.

but if you botherv to read thread title you can see im asking for legal opinion not gambler opinion

ok if you say that player vs dealer texas hold em is not the true hiold em, then what is it? how then would you classify player vs dealer texas poker?

did he tell u he is legal expert? how you know he is legal expert?

This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 04:00 PM

did i tell you to stfu?

im trying to gather but it will take time. 50 pages to read thru

anyway baccarat means either A win , B win, or tie. doesn't matter you call A as banker B as player, fundamentally still same

This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 04:04 PM

if kena tangksp basah then need go lockup i guess

you didnt answer my question. if a table called "texas hold em poker " isn't what it's named, then what is it actually?

This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 04:07 PM

doi you think i have a prima facie case?

in his earlier reply,
destiny6 is claiming that player vs dealer texas hold em does not qualify. even though the table name is literally "texas hold em poker"

im not trying to claim damages. im claiming that i did fulfill the letter and intention of the agreement

This post has been edited by timidandslow: Dec 23 2019, 04:20 PM