Apple iPod Touch is USA brand right? You know where it is manufactured?

of course I know many popular electronics are manufactured in China lah, but.. China based brand..... I don't mind it but I hope it's long lasting only...

Sansa fuze+, cowon e2, really don't noe which one to choose. I used to own sony walkman s series and i like the sound q. I have not tried the two in my consideration.
In terms of sound q which three of these is better?

cant decide..want to have alllllll.....lol

sony walkman s series is the best in the world. no need to choose any other brand. somemore sony is made in Japan, very well built and reputedly can last 20-30 years. made in china stuff... buy today tomolo it will rosak.

sony walkman s series is the best in the world. no need to choose any other brand. somemore sony is made in Japan, very well built and reputedly can last 20-30 years. made in china stuff... buy today tomolo it will rosak.

I'm afraid some people will take the superficial meaning of what u said bro. 

No offense, I believe in Sony's quality(at least for most items), but I think you're exaggerating too much.

20-30 years? 1 thing for sure, the battery will not last that long. My Sony handphones won't go more than 2 years(at best) before it start giving me problems. (Hey, it's a Sony, so I think it's a fair comparison.  We're talking about Japanese made products' quality right? )

Besides, ain't C30 a made in china stuff? I expect it to last. At least I've used it for last 2 weeks still no rosak.

P/s: I thought you like china made stuff. Cube C30. 

Also your iPod Touch example up there.

i know c30 is best bang for the bucks...

i know c30 is best bang for the bucks...if not for the design  i would definitely take it (not to say ugly, just personal preference). Fine i know mp3 player emphasizes on sound quality, usability and such. However personal taste and preference also come in right. Anyway i took cowon e2, it is about the same price with fuze+, which has a 2.4 inch screen and expandable memory and much more features.. longer battery playback hours..but the simpler the better for me.

Cheap with a big screen, 720p video support and microSD slot and dual Wolfson DAC, supposedly good sound quality and affordable. However......

Buggy firmware, poor battery life, compatibility issues with many operating system(XP seems to work best...not SP3 though), and did I mention buggy firmware?

The Teclast is a fine sounding player, but it is a disaster (worse than the Fuze) for navigation, playback, ID3, format support, stability, power management and a host of other issues. Overall, It performs well (via line out), but it isn't worth the size, the navigation pain, the file format problems.

I am the sort of bloke that hearkens back to MD and CD. You pop a disk in and play it. No problems. Why today, ten years later, do I have to buy an 'audiophile' player only to have it fail to run anywhere near as nice as a CD player? Sound of the T51 is good: nice wide stereo image, good driving potential with lowΩ and highΩ headphones/earphones/mulit armature earphones; but you sacrifice so much usability. And overall, it hisses more than compatible players, lacks gapless and a host of other features.

And, despite driving very well, it hasn't anything special about its sound other than the stereo separation, which is only just a bit better than modern iPod touch. That was the last audiophile player I bothered with (though I still have the HiSound AMP3 Pro2 and the Hifiman 602).

I keep hoping that someday, an audiophile company will make a good-sounding player that actually works and isn't just worth it to be thrown on the rubbish heap when the 'next best audiophile thing' comes out making this one seem silly.