QUOTE(patt_sue @ Nov 15 2019, 09:50 PM)
Prolly Gripen NG. Sadly FA-50 potential is nerfed hard by lockmart. Had they approved the AESA radar on FA-50 it'll be close in capability to Gripen C/DMilitary Thread V27
Military Thread V27
|
|
Nov 15 2019, 08:55 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 06:58 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1042
|
![]()
Probation
0 posts Joined: Sep 2019 |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 07:59 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
The Indonesian Army took delivery of 18 units CAESAR 155mm SPHs.
|
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 08:03 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE Philippines reveal multirole fighter options Gareth Jennings, Berlin - Jane's Defence Weekly 14 November 2019 The Philippines is looking to acquire one of four multirole fighter types to enhance the air defence and border protection capabilities of the country's air force. ![]() The Gripen is one of four multirole fighter types being considered for the PAF to enhance its air defence and border protection capabilities. (Czech Ministry of Defence) Speaking on 14 November, a senior Philippine Air Force (PAF) official presented a briefing slide showing the Eurofighter Typhoon, Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon, Sukhoi Su-30 'Flanker, and Saab Gripen as the options being considered to augment the service's current fleet of Korean Aerospace Industries (KAI) FA-50PH Fighting Eagle light-strike fighters. Commenting under the Chatham House Rule, the official noted that a memorandum of acquisition has already been processed for approval at the Department of National Defense (DND)-level, and that government funding to launch the project is expected in either the first or second quarter of 2020. https://www.janes.com/article/92568/philipp...fighter-options |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 09:26 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
11 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
QUOTE(LTZ @ Nov 15 2019, 04:08 PM) kalo mat sabu pegi pastu post dekat social media mesti best....dari dulu dok bising bising kapal selam tak menyelam dan duk dekat port je walaupun sub dah tembak torpedo dan missile pun masih tak percaya QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 15 2019, 06:32 PM) ??? it think its some where along that line....its been told and told how the LCA must be low cost in operation and maintenance so its never in their mind other than trainer should be contender....plus gripen before have been a candidate for MRCA so people may not expect it fall with in our budget for LCA tho...They are all light fighters. Gripen is roughly the same size and carries similar payload to FA-50 while Tejas is actually the smallest of all. JF-17 is the "heaviest" of all the options but they are roughly the same size as F-16 and if you trace F-16 development, they started as LWF (lightweight fighter) programme. Even JF-17 was designed based on J-7/Mig-21. I think pipu thought just because it's lca it's must be based off a trainer i would be surprise if we would buy gripen actually considering the price but then the govt or armed force can use those to get MPA also so its a good trade i think... |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 09:44 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: somewhere in PJ |
QUOTE Anyhow, I am told that the numbers of LCA to be funded by the government is indeed 36 – to be bought under three batches, 12 likely the LCA and six FLIT or LIFT in RMK12 with another 18 in RMK13. I believed the RMAF would prefer the same aircraft to be bought for the LCA and FLIT but with the decision to buy them in batches, things might change, of course. if indeed this is the plan 18 + 18, SAAB GRIPEN or KAI FA-50 will be possible. QUOTE As whether or not we are going to exercise the option to buy another 26 LCA, please check back in 2030, as I am told that is the current plan, buying 36 LCA in the next decade. And for those worried that we might end up buying a 4th generation MRCA, rest assured that I was told that the next multi-role fighter for RMAF will indeed be a fifth or sixth generation fighter. It is likely I will be retired or had passed on, by then, however. Hogging The Headlines Again |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 10:08 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
11 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
QUOTE(James831 @ Nov 16 2019, 09:44 AM) if indeed this is the plan 18 + 18, SAAB GRIPEN or KAI FA-50 will be possible. go for korea made, then ask for FDI...get those big korean tech company invest here and create job...govt get to create job and RMAF get good LCA....Hogging The Headlines Again QUOTE rest assured that I was told that the next multi-role fighter for RMAF will indeed be a fifth or sixth generation fighter. It is likely I will be retired or had passed on, by then, however. to me this passage made me died a little....it make me think the next jet fighter procurement will be really late in future despite MKM and hornet should start process to be replace around 2030 |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 10:09 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
227 posts Joined: Feb 2019 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 15 2019, 06:32 PM) ??? Those trainer-based like L-39 or M-346 and Gripen E/F are worlds apartThey are all light fighters. Gripen is roughly the same size and carries similar payload to FA-50 while Tejas is actually the smallest of all. JF-17 is the "heaviest" of all the options but they are roughly the same size as F-16 and if you trace F-16 development, they started as LWF (lightweight fighter) programme. Even JF-17 was designed based on J-7/Mig-21. I think pipu thought just because it's lca it's must be based off a trainer Like comparing Hawk and F-16V QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 15 2019, 08:55 PM) Prolly Gripen NG. Sadly FA-50 potential is nerfed hard by lockmart. Had they approved the AESA radar on FA-50 it'll be close in capability to Gripen C/D Gripen C/D has a very outdated 80s radar so I'd say radarwise at least it's more capableQUOTE(James831 @ Nov 16 2019, 09:44 AM) if indeed this is the plan 18 + 18, SAAB GRIPEN or KAI FA-50 will be possible. Sounds most logical Hogging The Headlines Again Basically goodbye MRCA, hello Gripen I don't really have a problem with that, given our economy I've always had major doubts we can sustain a 40+ twin engine MRCA fleet This post has been edited by KLthinker91: Nov 16 2019, 10:10 AM |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 10:50 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(zacky chan @ Nov 16 2019, 10:26 AM) kalo mat sabu pegi pastu post dekat social media mesti best....dari dulu dok bising bising kapal selam tak menyelam dan duk dekat port je walaupun sub dah tembak torpedo dan missile pun masih tak percaya this is why that fella being a defence minister is just :x ... not only no relevant academic background (if there's any), meroyan tah hapa2 time kena soal kt parlimen, his history of undermining the military/LE summore :x:x:x... dah xde orang lain ke nk bg jawatan menhan?it think its some where along that line....its been told and told how the LCA must be low cost in operation and maintenance so its never in their mind other than trainer should be contender....plus gripen before have been a candidate for MRCA so people may not expect it fall with in our budget for LCA tho... i would be surprise if we would buy gripen actually considering the price but then the govt or armed force can use those to get MPA also so its a good trade i think... btw Gripen is designed to be 1/3 of f-16 in term of maintenance/opex cost QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Nov 16 2019, 11:09 AM) Those trainer-based like L-39 or M-346 and Gripen E/F are worlds apart Eh in the end of the day it's all about maintenance cost of platform. whether or not they are developed as a trainer or not (which gripen was in the beginning) is irrelevant. else jf-17 and tejas shouldn't even be in the list, which they shouldn't in the first placeLike comparing Hawk and F-16V Gripen C/D has a very outdated 80s radar so I'd say radarwise at least it's more capable Sounds most logical Basically goodbye MRCA, hello Gripen I don't really have a problem with that, given our economy I've always had major doubts we can sustain a 40+ twin engine MRCA fleet Gripen C/D in current configuration is even more capable than FA-50. Gripen can carry much more mission and much more diverse armaments than FA-50. Gripen can do maritime strike, SEAD, BVR interception (+aew ofc) et cetera. Gripen C/D can launch AIM-120 or MICA or even meteor, anti ship missile and even cruise missile. what can FA-50, with equally outdated and inferior radar, do? this is why i said FA-50 got nerfed hard. not only that lockmard blocked Raytheon offfer to install aesa radar on FA-50, rokaf oso dun feel the need to equip them to match gripen despite its potential of matching gripen becoz of kfx |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 11:50 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
Indonesian Marine Corps Artillery Regiment in action during TNI Joint Exercise 2019.
|
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 12:03 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
0 posts Joined: Aug 2019 |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 12:08 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
227 posts Joined: Feb 2019 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 16 2019, 10:50 AM) Eh in the end of the day it's all about maintenance cost of platform. whether or not they are developed as a trainer or not (which gripen was in the beginning) is irrelevant. else jf-17 and tejas shouldn't even be in the list, which they shouldn't in the first place QUOTE Gripen C/D in current configuration is even more capable than FA-50. Gripen can carry much more mission and much more diverse armaments than FA-50. Gripen can do maritime strike, SEAD, BVR interception (+aew ofc) et cetera. Gripen C/D can launch AIM-120 or MICA or even meteor, anti ship missile and even cruise missile. what can FA-50, with equally outdated and inferior radar, do? I think you're describing the Gripen E/F there...?this is why i said FA-50 got nerfed hard. not only that lockmard blocked Raytheon offfer to install aesa radar on FA-50, rokaf oso dun feel the need to equip them to match gripen despite its potential of matching gripen becoz of kfx ROKAF have the Israeli radar for their FA-50 I thought |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 12:09 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
257 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 12:13 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
257 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 12:20 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Nov 16 2019, 12:03 PM) Yes additional batch.News of the procurement in 2017: QUOTE 21 FEBRUARY 2017 Nexter to supply additional Caesar artillery systems to Indonesian Armed Forces Nexter has secured a contract to supply 18 additional Caesar artillery systems to the Indonesian National Armed Forces. The Caesar is a 155mm wheeled self-propelled howitzer designed to support rapid deployment forces. This 52-calibre, self-propelled gun can maintain a firing rate of six to eight rounds a minute in its sustained fire mode, or three rounds in 15 seconds in rapid fire mode. In addition, the Caesar is fitted with a FAST-Hit computerised fire management system, an Intertechnique ROB4 muzzle velocity radar, and a SAGEM Sigma 30 navigation system and global positioning system (GPS). It can use a wide range of ammunition against protected and unprotected targets, as well as block the manoeuvres of enemy armoured forces. Under the contract, Nexter will also provide its firing control system, Caesar simulators for training, and more than 50 artillery battalion auxiliary vehicles assembled in Indonesia by its local partner PT Pindad. Indonesia had previously ordered 36 Caesar artillery systems in 2012. https://www.army-technology.com/news/newsne...forces-5746132/ This post has been edited by azriel: Nov 16 2019, 12:20 PM |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 12:22 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
11 posts Joined: Jun 2018 |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 16 2019, 10:50 AM) this is why that fella being a defence minister is just :x ... not only no relevant academic background (if there's any), meroyan tah hapa2 time kena soal kt parlimen, his history of undermining the military/LE summore :x:x:x... dah xde orang lain ke nk bg jawatan menhan? irony....considering the old oppo keep fuss about how old govt minister was not up to education and experience...and yet new govt minister are also newbie with some bad/fake certificate....but that is politic...btw Gripen is designed to be 1/3 of f-16 in term of maintenance/opex cost Eh in the end of the day it's all about maintenance cost of platform. whether or not they are developed as a trainer or not (which gripen was in the beginning) is irrelevant. else jf-17 and tejas shouldn't even be in the list, which they shouldn't in the first place Gripen C/D in current configuration is even more capable than FA-50. Gripen can carry much more mission and much more diverse armaments than FA-50. Gripen can do maritime strike, SEAD, BVR interception (+aew ofc) et cetera. Gripen C/D can launch AIM-120 or MICA or even meteor, anti ship missile and even cruise missile. what can FA-50, with equally outdated and inferior radar, do? this is why i said FA-50 got nerfed hard. not only that lockmard blocked Raytheon offfer to install aesa radar on FA-50, rokaf oso dun feel the need to equip them to match gripen despite its potential of matching gripen becoz of kfx i'm more concern about the procurement cost of gripen actually...maintenance wise,for a 4th gen fighter,gripen was a good deal....we still dont know how much money will be allocate for LCA...i think we will be lucky if can get 1.5 billion USD for that...but hope it wont be less than 1billion USD... QUOTE(bereev @ Nov 16 2019, 12:09 PM) future IDF in training maybe...Melentur Buluh Biarlah Dari Rebungnya |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 12:44 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
0 posts Joined: Aug 2019 |
QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 16 2019, 08:03 AM) Pinoy has FA-50. Their first choice must be F-16V.After SG and indonesia, now it is pinoy turn to procure D-16V. Next could be thai. |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 01:00 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Nov 16 2019, 01:08 PM) I'm just saying, the aircraft shown in the slide are very different in capability israel radar cost extra. by default they came with apg-67 and there's no way we're getting elta radarI think you're describing the Gripen E/F there...? ROKAF have the Israeli radar for their FA-50 I thought oso this is what gripen c carries ![]() |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 01:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
227 posts Joined: Feb 2019 From: Cherasboy |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Nov 16 2019, 01:00 PM) israel radar cost extra. by default they came with apg-67 and there's no way we're getting elta radar I was talking about ROKAF in that sentenceoso this is what gripen c carries I know these weapons are what Gripen carries, but to make proper use of them, depends on the sensors and avionics, in which regard the C/D variant is quite outdated QUOTE(zacky chan @ Nov 16 2019, 12:22 PM) irony....considering the old oppo keep fuss about how old govt minister was not up to education and experience...and yet new govt minister are also newbie with some bad/fake certificate....but that is politic... You know I know, Mat Sabu is a blind for LCT i'm more concern about the procurement cost of gripen actually...maintenance wise,for a 4th gen fighter,gripen was a good deal....we still dont know how much money will be allocate for LCA...i think we will be lucky if can get 1.5 billion USD for that...but hope it wont be less than 1billion USD... I'm concerned about ammo stocks and spare parts as well Brazil's 36-ship Gripen NG deal was a stunning 5.44 billion USD in 2014; in today's dollars that would be 5.9 billion... fikirlah QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Nov 16 2019, 12:44 PM) Pinoy has FA-50. Their first choice must be F-16V. Thai already have GripenAfter SG and indonesia, now it is pinoy turn to procure D-16V. Next could be thai. Pinoy choice will depend on how well Dutetek eats his words |
|
|
Nov 16 2019, 01:57 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Sep 2009 From: under the moonlight |
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Nov 16 2019, 02:17 PM) I was talking about ROKAF in that sentence What is the thing that made them oudated? Because it's not aesa? kek our F/A-18 can do maritime strike and bvr without aesa for long time as we only got aesa for our F/A-18 quite recently. besides the radar in C/D variant is already MkIV (introduced recently) which is almost twice the capability of MkIII, and that's is just due to increased power in today's semiconductor technologyI know these weapons are what Gripen carries, but to make proper use of them, depends on the sensors and avionics, in which regard the C/D variant is quite outdated You know I know, Mat Sabu is a blind for LCT I'm concerned about ammo stocks and spare parts as well Brazil's 36-ship Gripen NG deal was a stunning 5.44 billion USD in 2014; in today's dollars that would be 5.9 billion... fikirlah Thai already have Gripen Pinoy choice will depend on how well Dutetek eats his words |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0187sec
0.35
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 10:52 AM |