QUOTE(zstan @ Feb 24 2023, 11:01 PM)
Too early wait until end of March π€¦ββοΈInvestment StashAway Malaysia, Multi-Region ETF at your fingertips!
Investment StashAway Malaysia, Multi-Region ETF at your fingertips!
|
|
Feb 25 2023, 03:41 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 8 2023, 10:48 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Drian @ Mar 8 2023, 10:10 AM) SRI 6.5% to 12.5% is kind of sily. Of course because they have invested more in a cash equivalents hence the bar has been set lower The benchmarks is lower than FD interest rates . They are lowering the bar so much. QUOTE(MUM @ Mar 8 2023, 10:31 AM) You got to see the benchmark otherwise how they gonna perform SA goal is to beat benchmark when maintaining and not deviate the SRI otherwise why bother benchmark instead π€¦ββοΈ |
|
|
Mar 8 2023, 12:40 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(MUM @ Mar 8 2023, 12:29 PM) Benchmark can be set low so that it will always beat it. Remember benchmark it is not all about performance π€¦ββοΈEven with benchmark, there is no legal binding that it had to follow it performance. It is based upon risks, allocations and returns Yes they can set it low and beat it but why they donβt do that it is because of the fees that they can collect by setting a higher benchmark while not meeting it Mutual funds in Malaysia are the best examples of it π€¦ββοΈ This post has been edited by xander2k8: Mar 8 2023, 12:41 PM |
|
|
Mar 8 2023, 12:53 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(MUM @ Mar 8 2023, 12:45 PM) Yes but does he understand that the performance stems from the allocation and risks π€¦ββοΈThe reason why it is low for SRI 6.5% to 12.5% it is due to higher allocation for cash equivalents like I explained before already |
|
|
Mar 8 2023, 12:59 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2023, 01:13 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 8 2023, 02:03 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2023, 04:13 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(MUM @ Mar 8 2023, 03:40 PM) I think his word for silly imply if " just afraid of losing money or for wealth preservation purposes, .... " FD could be better suited than using that 2 SRI Rather than being silly he should the purpose of it instead MUM liked this post
|
|
|
Mar 15 2023, 05:51 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(James.L1M @ Mar 15 2023, 02:03 PM) On average, real inflation eats FD rates for breakfast. Currently interest rates are relatively high while The Fed continues to raise interest rates, negatively affecting equity markets overall. 2023 still looks rather choppy and will certainly affect StashAway's performance across the board. Not necessary π€¦ββοΈ because the lower SRI holding more cash equivalents James.L1M liked this post
|
|
|
Mar 16 2023, 05:24 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 18 2023, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2023, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(MUM @ Mar 19 2023, 12:55 AM) did you lose money and was hoping for a turn around?? Those are glorified returns when the fees and depreciation of currency not taken account into π€¦ββοΈimage sourced from https://www.stashaway.my/r/returns-since-launch-YTD-2022 QUOTE(red streak @ Mar 19 2023, 01:21 AM) ...and here's the main guy himself Donβt bother because they just doesnβt realised how much is losing while on top paying more in fees for SA to lose more ![]() For sure soon they will reopt again because even latest defensive play it is not working π€¦ββοΈ |
|
|
Mar 19 2023, 07:00 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(MUM @ Mar 19 2023, 01:33 AM) Partly yes because they donβt hedge for depreciation π€¦ββοΈIf they allow direct USD then it is different story QUOTE(red streak @ Mar 19 2023, 01:39 AM) Then tell me what are the USD returns? It's not a hard question is it? Even you realize them using only MYR to benchmark returns is downright dishonest. Which is kinda funny. It is hard for them to project in USD because of the currency movement hence SA is partly to blame Unless they willing to show a fix amount of USD since day 1 performance it will be different story Anyway beware that in losing market SA is losing more of your money than what you think because of this blindside π€¦ββοΈ Donβt forget their TWR and MWR it is not accurate what you think and you should look at the amount being loss now |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2023, 08:05 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Hoshiyuu @ Mar 19 2023, 09:05 AM) Discussion doesn't have to be vitrolic, calm down friends. The infographic did cover the fees on the bottom π€¦ββοΈ while using yearly additional sum of 10k with projected 5.5% yearly gainThough, my personal two cents is that Stashaway's annualized return infographic can be very misleading to some extent? Their numbers are very optimistic and not very representative of real use cases, and their methodology is not fully clear, there's plenty of way to fuzz the numbers to make it look a lot better than it is. For example, in the returns infographic, it does not take into factors such as 1. Stashaway Fees 2. Reoptimization 3. Deposit/Withdrawal timings 4. USD/MYR forex returns Most of their returns are still from the initial inception bullruns and lucky successful reoptimizations, on the flip side, anyone who's been here from late 2020 onwards would still be looking at a sea of red for god knows when to come, so I wouldn't be surprised if tension runs high. Ultimately, fund performance within a 2-3 year window are far from a useful judge of a portfolio performance - seeing that the average investor here probably has a horizon of 20-30 years. My take is always judge Stashaway for everything surrounding it except their performance - is their fees good? Is their investing philosophy sound and aligned to your interest? Would the alternative to Stashaway (to you) is just not investing at all? When I evaluated it for 2 years, I've found Stashaway incompatible with me - I love how easy it is to set up a reoccuring deposit and forget about it - the truly "Stashaway" nature of investing. It's great that to some people that would have just let their currency rot in their back for 0.25% interest, Stashaway is incredibly straight forward and encourages "set it up and forget". But, I dislike their reoptimization and stock-pickiness nature, their crazy KWEB sector tilting saga (which was not indicated to me that this is going to be a thing before I started their portfolio), their slow deposit to investing period, the MYR->USD conversion process, their almost misleading fee structure, their app changes and fuzzing of words and numbers during bearish times, the messy MYR/USD return values, and fortunately for myself, I have access to alternative ways to invest in a fashion that's more aligned to what I have in mind. But above all else, I do not judge them for their returns in a 2 year period out of my next 30 - that's just plain silly, in my opinion. |
|
|
Mar 20 2023, 03:23 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(red streak @ Mar 19 2023, 11:09 PM) The thing is time in the market is something that people keep repeating without understanding anything about it. It means buy and hold. Which is not what SA is doing at all. They tikam buy random shit based on the overpaid fund managers they hired and then sell everything, only to repeat the process every year or so. Now what they're doing is called timing the market. Which is the exact opposite of what you want to be doing when investing long term. The reason why they're doing so is as you said in the second part, they're overpaid fund managers and they want to be seen doing something so they can justify their ripoff fees. In doing so, they lock in their bad bets and losses so you can never recover in the long term even if the market averages 10% returns per year over the coming decades. Do they really care? Not at all since their almost 1% fee keeps chugging along regardless of how poorly they perform. 1stly there is no overpaid fund managers in SA π€¦ββοΈAlso time in the market almost always refers to investing passively and consistently in ETFs/mutual funds that track the S&P500 or the market as a whole. It doesn't mean randomly buying shit and expecting it to return money consistently, though those bets could pay off if you're Warren Buffett. The decision of asset allocation of SA it is based upon an investment committee in SA and headed by CIO The only thing that is SA incurred is the platform management iinm it is run on AWS, the brokerage Saxo, local banks account with trustee which Pacific Trustee in Malaysia and other expenses like staff and rents Which is why SA is able to take 50bps out of the minimum fees as their profit but yet still having losses even though running a billion dollar fund π€¦ββοΈ likely not now after the drawdown from KWEB rahtid liked this post
|
|
|
Mar 21 2023, 10:51 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Drian @ Mar 21 2023, 09:29 AM) To me stashaway oversold on their capabilities and did not deliver. Even the Fed canβt read the economic data and react promptly what makes SA better than them π€¦ββοΈThey were also wrong in their bets. Example of their marketing and how it differs to reality. Also they tend to inflate the returns I don't know how they manage to make the gains positive in the app despite it losing money. So when the hyped up their AUM at 1billion since then they been humbled by their markets and yet still losing from the reopt as always |
|
|
Mar 22 2023, 03:22 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2023, 05:22 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(godhpf @ Mar 23 2023, 05:02 PM) While I don't judge SA using short time period's performance, I disagree with using MYR to judge SA's performance. That is what SA supposed to be in the 1st place while to use this to their advantage SA converts your fund to USD before investing (except for Simple), so it only make sense to judge SA's performance using USD. Otherwise, the performance is masked by currency fluctuations. You can use MYR to see how much you will have at the end of the day, but to judge the performance, it should be in USD. Performance is by judging USD holdings while return is on RM performance But the way script their returns no doubt will leave a bitter to taste to many π€¦ββοΈ |
|
|
Mar 24 2023, 05:40 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Aaron212 @ Mar 24 2023, 12:11 PM) Your ikbr all buy hype stocks??? He bought it at high possibly I cincai buy US individual stock also can breakeven eventho i bought hyped up electric china companies But Nvidia, google, meta, schd all pulled me up so high NVIDIA and Meta is closing on previous price when the bull run ended hence if bought the actual dip back in Oct you are smiling now with gains π |
|
|
Mar 24 2023, 06:32 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Aaron212 @ Mar 24 2023, 06:08 PM) Those hype EV shit stocks ruined my portfolio Then when market turns you will burned Should just go all in US big techs n stable dividends also Wont go wrong or die You should have allocate your asset wit whatever you feel comfortable and not just all in big tech and dividends π€¦ββοΈ My only blemish this year Tesla but the rest still holding up while selling all the 2022 winners |
| Change to: | 0.0522sec
0.76
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 10:11 PM |