We've been misled by the extravagant costumes of Chinese dramas whether Taiwan, HK or mainland productions, where even the beggars are fat n wear clean new clothes.
Let's look at some real photos of commoners in those days. Of course where the photos are posed the people dressed up for the photos as it's not as easy as today to hv photos taken. And such photos are of relatively well off commoners.
Poor folks
Mixed
This post has been edited by EdBaaBaa: Aug 26 2018, 09:21 AM
We've been misled by the extravagant costumes of Chinese dramas whether Taiwan, HK or mainland productions, where even the beggars are fat n wear clean new clothes.
Let's look at some real photos of commoners in those days. Of course where the photos are posed the people dressed up for the photos as it's not as easy as today to hv photos taken. And such photos are of relatively well off commoners.
We've been misled by the extravagant costumes of Chinese dramas whether Taiwan, HK or mainland productions, where even the beggars are fat n wear clean new clothes.
Let's look at some real photos of commoners in those days. Of course where the photos are posed the people dressed up for the photos as it's not as easy as today to hv photos taken. And such photos are of relatively well off commoners.
No beautiful lady and handsome young man last time. Maybe the geographical (yunnan and northern people), diet, etc. Pic from 1930/ww2 era is different, can see beauty and handsome lad.
No beautiful lady and handsome young man last time. Maybe the geographical (yunnan and northern people), diet, etc. Pic from 1930/ww2 era is different, can see beauty and handsome lad.
Pls include the time span of the era. Not everyone knows when was the Qing era period n no hab time too giggle..
Kuku jiao panjang... i mean kuku panjang macam mak lampir
The year probably around 1880-1900. Camera was invented during american civil war and movie is around 1880++ Pic where you see male without pig tail is around 1900 ( during this time many cut off their pigtail.
1911 mark fall of qing dynasty.
QUOTE(EdBaaBaa @ Aug 26 2018, 09:35 AM)
It's just the styling that makes the difference.
Nope, not because of styling. I mean I look at their face. Let me know if you spot any beautiful lady / handsome guys. Let's research together.
Also you have pic from Southern china? Maybe there we can see more han people and they might be good looking.
This post has been edited by wanted111who: Aug 26 2018, 09:43 AM
Everywhere have their poor and their rich. What I'm saying is at least they don't have shit all over the road. Europe was so bad until carts and wagons pulled by horses can't even move and got stuck due to how much shit is on the road.
Indeed I hv read of that.
But my guess is that old China must hv areas piled with excrement too except there's no photos of that.
After all the poor n beggars probably pooped in the streets too n the richer had theirs thrown out onto the streets as well.
Old cameras needed quite long exposure time, probably no one wanted to remain in or close to piles of excrement to take photos. Haha
Further, it's harder to see specific details in b&w photos n it's not HD quality. What u see as a shadow or rock on the ground may well be shit.
This post has been edited by EdBaaBaa: Aug 26 2018, 10:06 AM
OK la looks more civilised than Europe during those times. At least the streets in the videos are clean.
London used to be filled with shit on the road, people walk and drive carts on shit and piss
Are you retarded? Are you thinking of medieval Europe??
Not that I want to fanboy over Europe or anything, but during the 1880s-1900s Europe and London for example was way better kept and more advanced than Qing China. Most well in the prime of being wealthy Imperial powers di. No one would leave their home without a hat (go look at pictures) and you definitely wouldn't see naked boys in the street with only rags to wear on top.
Lol so where are the pictures of poor people? You saying Europe everyone rich? Even today we have beggers with rags in KL. What makes you think Europe won't have any those days? Why you're comparing pics of Europe wealthy people with China poor people, then claim Europe better kept and more advanced? Bodoh tu simpan sikit la So much jilat penjajah mentality coming from you
The burden of proof falls on you to provide.
"Qing China is more civilized than Europe" "Europe in 1900s the streets are filled with shit you can't move"
Waiting for pictures of those... Meanwhile when I type 1900s Europe, I get:
"Europe in 1900s the streets are filled with shit you can't move" You must mean medieval Europe dude. "Qing China is more civilized than Europe" "Qing China is more civilized than Europe" Lol. Trust me it's not just me laughing. Everyone's laughing at that. The Chinese are laughing at you.
Lol so where are the pictures of poor people? You saying Europe everyone rich? Even today we have beggers with rags in KL. What makes you think Europe won't have any those days? Why you're comparing pics of Europe wealthy people with China poor people, then claim Europe better kept and more advanced? Bodoh tu simpan sikit la So much jilat penjajah mentality coming from you
What he said is true, not saying there is no poor people in uk but the street really are cleaner because the government is very wealthy after robbing from india, malaya, africa, middle east and China (opium) + hong kong + shanghai.
Those pictures are usually during the time when famine and civil war, if late 1800s the Qing dynasty is already on its last legs, government defunct and ridden with opium, no different when it fall, maybe worse during Chiang kai shek’s time as I heard a British missionary said there’s dead bodies on the streets and these elites don’t see them as human, it’s no wonder why communism too over so fast.
Burden of proof? What you think this is a court room? Lol Still waiting for pictures of poor Europe, but nope lol. If you have no other better come backs then go back home and continue to lick your master white trash ass cracks. Lmao
You're just pushing it to me because you can't find any pictures yourself, eh? "Qing China is more advanced than 1900s Europe"
This post has been edited by DeerCollision: Aug 26 2018, 11:26 AM
Don't know, just from the look. At the first video those who smoke opiym look like han people. And those monarch and soldier is manchu.
I watch many china 1930 video. The facial is clearly very different.
Nope, only royal family is half Manchu, no real aisin gioro bloodline since before puyi.
Many whom u see who are “monarch or soldiers “ are Han. Banner armies were almost wiped out during taiping rebellion. Many of these pics are modern armies before they don the uniform.
Pic below are Manchu royalty(like it or not there is Han royalty also like some Ming dynasty prince puyi had)
This post has been edited by tdzheng: Aug 26 2018, 11:02 AM
or could it be selective breeding? aliens are invading and polluting the great earth genes. see how the eyes gradually become bigger and the chin become sharper as time goes on?
alien
earth
This post has been edited by tictac88: Aug 26 2018, 11:34 AM
Everywhere have their poor and their rich. What I'm saying is at least they don't have shit all over the road. Europe was so bad until carts and wagons pulled by horses can't even move and got stuck due to how much shit is on the road.
Until now cannot provide any evidence of this in 1900 Europe/Edwardian London and ask people to believe. You watch too much Medieval drama lol
Then ask people to post pictures for him to prove his fever theory.
Show me the shit-filled streets? Meanwhile people laughing left right and centre at your claim that war-torn and poverty stricken Qing Dynasty was more advanced than Europe of the same period. Go back to history class la, boy
Meanwhile in China only emperor are rich and others are filth poor.
This is Not true.
Below the Emperor u hv the nobles who were either nobles by birth or were granted titles for service to the country, some titles hereditary some not.
Then u hv a class of officials who may be nobles as well. Of course some official appointments are more prestigious n hv more opportunities to make money.
Below that there's the merchant class who may hv lots of money but status is below officials.
You may not be aware but no matter how much money a merchant has, he still had to adhere to the social rules which determined every aspect of life eg how many concubines u can hv, wat material u can wear, how many horses + type+color to draw yr carriage, how many slaves /servants u can hv, wat yr wife + daughters can wear, type of jewellery + gemstones etc.
So status was v important n anyone can try to improve one's status by education. It was the only way one can elevate oneself n family. This is a major reason Chinese emphasize heavily on education.
If you are educated u are respected; more so than if you only hv money.
Of course the world has changed even for Chinese, many now think money is more important than anything else.
Title of this vid is "kids of prosperous families"
This post has been edited by EdBaaBaa: Aug 26 2018, 12:24 PM
We've been misled by the extravagant costumes of Chinese dramas whether Taiwan, HK or mainland productions, where even the beggars are fat n wear clean new clothes.
Let's look at some real photos of commoners in those days. Of course where the photos are posed the people dressed up for the photos as it's not as easy as today to hv photos taken. And such photos are of relatively well off commoners.
Poor folks
Mixed
This is not surprising as qing dynasty was one of those extreme corrupted period where the arustocrats are rich but the common people are poor.
The jurchens did not fully adopt chinese way of running a country causing extreme inequality.
mindset and general preception.... last time the lady must be fat and backside must be big to indicate she is very "subur".... the real beauty is not by face but rather the feet.... the smaller the pretty and elegant .... only well do family girls can have foot binding because no need to work...
This post has been edited by sukhoi35mk: Aug 26 2018, 01:20 PM
U said "the common people are poor" which if u had read n understood #51, u would know is not necessarily true.
Merchants could be very rich n they are not classed as "arustocrats" or nobles but as commoners.
The underlined statement is not the same as what u said abt "arustocrats". There were poor manchus n rich hans as well.
U forgot that the qing dynasty closed its door to the outside world for many years. So. What merchant?
There is no international merchant, only domestic merchant.
Even later when qing dynasty door was force open later, trading permits are confined to a small amount of priviledged people, guess who? Mostly aristocrats.
Those pictures are usually during the time when famine and civil war, if late 1800s the Qing dynasty is already on its last legs, government defunct and ridden with opium, no different when it fall, maybe worse during Chiang kai shek’s time as I heard a British missionary said there’s dead bodies on the streets and these elites don’t see them as human, it’s no wonder why communism too over so fast.
In 1911-1930 , it's actually the replubic of china getting the upper hand over communists china. Communist china is reduced to only 1 single provience until the japanese attack china in 1932. Both republic china and communist china agreed on ceasefire to fight against japanese agressor.
After world war 2 ended. China civil war resume where both republic china and communist china is on equal footings. Republic china lost to communist because whenever communist china take over city, they open the granary to give good to the people + spreading propaganda like " before revolution, we are the slave to the nobles. After revolution, we are the slave to the slave", making them getting more and more influence in China as people savior. Yes, a bag of grain is winning the war for communist china. Losing the battle, Republic china fled to taiwan.
That's why taiwan claimed they are the real china. If we look back at the the Chinese national flag in 1920, its the koumintang flag (white star with blue circle) which was used by taiwan until today.
Japanese occupation changing the china history forever.
This post has been edited by wanted111who: Aug 26 2018, 06:45 PM
In 1911-1930 , it's actually the replubic of china getting the upper hand over communists china. Communist china is reduced to only 1 single provience until the japanese attack china in 1932. Both republic china and communist china agreed on ceasefire to fight against japanese agressor.
After world war 2 ended. China civil war resume where both republic china and communist china is on equal footings. Republic china lost to communist because whenever communist china take over city, they open the granary to give good to the people + spreading propaganda like " before revolution, we are the slave to the nobles. After revolution, we are the slave to the slave", making them getting more and more influence in China as people savior. Yes, a bag of grain is winning the war for communist china. Losing the battle, Republic china fled to taiwan.
That's why taiwan claimed they are the real china. If we look back at the the Chinese national flag in 1920, its the koumintang flag (white star with blue circle) which was used by taiwan until today.
Japanese occupation changing the china history forever.
Part of it I was talking about after ww2, my bad not posting the date.
Amazing how a few generations of better nutrition/diet can change entire populations....
In fact the whole world was shorter and smaller 100 years ago, compared to today. So a lot of movies where they showing the era is olden days is simply NOT accurate, especially if it depicts Asia.
Because the people looked different back then (worse looking mostly) and smaller size.
This post has been edited by Hobbez: Aug 26 2018, 07:56 PM
Those were commoners. Lets face it china has been in turmoil and a lot of wars and warlords. Lu ingat commoners peasants all wear inside castle mia tvb drama bling bling clothes? Pakaila otak cikit sohaiz.
Amazing how a few generations of better nutrition/diet can change entire populations....
In fact the whole world was shorter and smaller 100 years ago, compared to today. So a lot of movies where they showing the era is olden days is simply NOT accurate, especially if it depicts Asia.
Because the people looked different back then (worse looking mostly) and smaller size.
QUOTE(Hobbez @ Aug 26 2018, 07:58 PM)
Better diet/nutrition.
This is certainly interesting thought - is it because of diet or is it because of gene? Hard to tell.
Yunnan lady present day.
There are some lady who look like lady in old photo, some are beautiful, because of diet or because of mix breeding?
This post has been edited by wanted111who: Aug 26 2018, 09:14 PM
Don't forget nowadays we got make up and last time women have no make up. No plastic surgery...
Last time, fat women considered beautiful also.....
Nowadays, even people around 50 years old, still look like 30s, but such a phenomenon was unthinkable 100-70 years ago.
People expected to grow old at 50 and become grandpa and grandma. They never exercise also. They had no gym, no knowledge about health.
Not any more these days.....
You're right I guessed. With improved food science, we can get access to better and safer food nutrients and improving our lifestyle, health and longevity.
Compare to old time where life expectancy is low, around 50-60 years, ( I guessed from the age of each longest servings emporer kangxi and yong zheng who died of old age)