QUOTE(Red_rustyjelly @ Jul 9 2018, 11:20 PM)
this clause is true
Under reality, 1 question that in constitution if the buyer did not provide ample of time for the seller to administrate responses, it can be consider defame.
EVEN if the seller honor back the price they posted before, it also can be consider defame. because by shaming a company's image online apart from rating system via internet platform IE google rating, facebook review rating, etc.
The case is like if a guy A accidentally stole a parking from guy B, without proper engagement guy B film it and viral it online. it is unfair practice and it could result in damage claim.
But in reality, no one will bother suing if they got viral unless they got time and money.
I am also not defending on the Seller, because I don't agree that seller reason's price mistake.
It is already a breach of consumer law for not honoring posted price
I understand that you're not defending the seller.
In my experience, defamation charges can only be pressed if it is unbased/untrue. If defamation charges can be so easily pushed, i think most of us, especially those in /K would be in jail not being able to enjoy their popcorns.
In any case, i doubt any charges will be presented for this case, it might spell seller's own demise in doing so.