Wow, I can only say the consumption is horrendous even for heavy foot. This reflects what circulated around the net is correct
1. The consumption doesn’t take idling into account
2. The fuel consumption far exceeds the declared rating

With the fuel tank 60l and assuming 8l reserve, so 52l fuel will only get you about 380km. I can imagine it might be worst if 100% city drive.

Probably once you trigger the turbo, the consumption will shoot up.

Heavy footed driving style for the mid size SUV. I think the average consumption is reasonable.

Average 10L/100km I think it ls a fair FC for this SUV. Maybe after 1 or 2 service the FC could be improved further from the current FC.

R u going to get x70?

U can check the professional car blogger review, very details n accurate. Im driving B segment car, honda city. Never test drive other suv, cant give u good feedback. For sure is im happy owner 😂 love the comfort ride n its Adaptive Cruise control

What the review not mention is the actual FC, mine as mention b4, is at high side. My city drive 12L/100km above, but havent calculate the 100% highway fc.

Reason i choose x70 is it is worthy, offer the best spec compare with other more expensive suv, smart car fun to ride, comfortable, ACC, good looking solid car, high FC is acceptable for my weekend car, support proton so that geely will intro more cheap fancy car 😂 but the top reason for me is it is CBU, no doubt in decision to take first batch without test drive

your FC is a long term FC ka?

FC is bit of a turn off

wonder what the next models will be?

lync and co

Fuel is biggest turn off as many reported 14.5litre per 100km...that's really high n thirsty .

What about other suv consumption?

I think cx5, crv n tiguan are contenders.

If all have similar fc, then it's acceptable.

Booked x70...like all features except fuel. Gonna use it daily for highway.

My Tiguan, mainly city drive about 600km on 60 little.

[sorry don’t know how to rotate the pic]

This post has been edited by ck77: Jan 18 2019, 10:21 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)

X70 dont hv good FC at the begining back in china. Its selling points r fancy spec, safety & quality. If fc is ur top concern then u may skip x70 d n get those high efficient expensive car 😂

Long term worse, 14-15L/100km. Around 12-13L/100km is my new adapted driving behavior

This post has been edited by luvox: Jan 18 2019, 11:29 AM

CX5 real malaysian owner usage very positive, 10-12 km/l

Your remark is the ONLY real malaysian owner FC, and once my wife tahu, terus she dun wan. She is quite an advocate for the X70, now turning to CRV and CX5

but if you calculate the total cost savings from better FC, even at 2k km monthly mileage, for 5 years, cannot beat the 30k cheaper car price of the X70

How is the sound system quality and NVH compare to city?

City is a competitor???

im very well aware of that, haha! but when place that into account (plus i really ON for the CX5 isntead of the X70), more the reason to say no.

Really 14litre per 100km? I think its not possible as yhe test car also register this 14litre per km...

2 possibility...
1. 14.5litre is the max it can calculate
2. Customers use in city only??

How can test car fuel consumption be sane as end users??

because he owns city, that y he can point out the difference.
BTW i m not city owner..

If the x70 meter show fc 14L/100km, the actual fc mayb 16.8L/100km. My calculated fc is around 20% higher than the fc computed at the meter. Other car also same, actual fc mayb 10% - 15% higher than wat is computed at the meter

What i mean is if i told u my actual fc calculated from volume petrol pump n travel distance, is 12L/100km, the computed fc at my x70 may only show 10L/100km. How got this big different, some ppl say mayb the computed fc is not counting in engine idle at the traffic, or the computer is not sensitive enuf, i dont know. U can compare the actual fc of ur current car n ur calculated fc n let everyone know how big the different

This post has been edited by luvox: Jan 18 2019, 04:01 PM

Calculated fc for example,
Distance 1383-1254=129
Fuel spent 57-40.5=16.5
Actual FC = 12.79L/100km
But indicator that i hv reset after refueling show 9.7 L/100km for computed fc

This post has been edited by luvox: Jan 18 2019, 04:33 PM

No wonder they call it bo yue. Most accurate name ever.

NVH is very good. When crusing at low speed, u cant feel ur tyres, n like driving a space ship. 😂

Sound system average, readjust the equalizer only gives some small improvement, not a good system for audiophile, the bass is too soft even for premium with subwoofer

This post has been edited by luvox: Jan 18 2019, 05:05 PM