Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Kelvin's S3is Shots

views
     
TSkelvinyam
post Aug 4 2007, 10:09 AM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


This was captured in my house garden. I have captured a few with minimum aperture but still couldn't gat a sharp image. The length of bee is about 5mm. Under a heavy crop, the noise can be seen even at ISO80. I used layer mask to apply noise reduction on the BG, and sharpen the bee by 150% with Unsharp Mask.

user posted image

F8, 1/30

Please comment and advise how I could improve further.

This post has been edited by kelvinyam: Aug 4 2007, 10:09 AM
vichio
post Aug 4 2007, 01:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
don't know why Canon didn't handle noise of PnS systems as well as they done with DSLR. i also find noise at ISO 100 of my S3 IS too sad.gif like your pic, if increase shuttle speed will get sharper image but also need to increase ISO so noise....wao sad.gif
orenzai
post Aug 4 2007, 01:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


maybe coz they don care really much on that aspect?
CompMac
post Aug 4 2007, 03:41 PM

世界見てください
******
Senior Member
1,573 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Slave in Seremban...


The noise is due to sensor size. The higher megapixel per square mm, the higher the noise.
vichio
post Aug 4 2007, 04:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
so how Fujifilm does so great to handle noise with their PnS ? smile.gif almost their PnS very clean even at ISO 800
orenzai
post Aug 4 2007, 04:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


prosumer cam mar...but i must admit...its quite a decent performance...
TSkelvinyam
post Aug 4 2007, 08:44 PM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


QUOTE(CompMac @ Aug 4 2007, 03:41 PM)
The noise is due to sensor size. The higher megapixel per square mm, the higher the noise.
*
I got to agree with you. When come to sensor, size does matter.

QUOTE(vichio @ Aug 4 2007, 04:07 PM)
so how Fujifilm does so great to handle noise with their PnS ? smile.gif almost their PnS very clean even at ISO 800
*
I would say Fuji has a very good image processor. At high ISO, it seems it's better than Digic III, at noise handling.

QUOTE(orenzai @ Aug 4 2007, 04:10 PM)
prosumer cam mar...but i must admit...its quite a decent performance...
*
For the price of RM1400, I'm afraid we can't demand for more.
orenzai
post Aug 4 2007, 08:47 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


whoa...we here PC FAIR somemore..selling at 1699...
TSkelvinyam
post Aug 4 2007, 08:54 PM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


I think even for the later S5IS, many shops do offer RM1400. You get cheap printer in PC Fair, not camera smile.gif
orenzai
post Aug 4 2007, 08:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


my place "pc fair" is only stock "clearence fair"...
TSkelvinyam
post Aug 4 2007, 10:30 PM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


I was in a chicken rice shop today...

user posted image

F2.7, 1/10
orenzai
post Aug 5 2007, 12:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


cha siao!!!
TSkelvinyam
post Aug 5 2007, 05:17 PM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


Flower

user posted image
F8, 1/250

Butterfly #1
user posted image
F2.7, 1/320

Butterfly #2
user posted image
F2.7, 1/400

I wish the background for butterfly shots was less "busy", but couldn't find a better angle.

This post has been edited by kelvinyam: Aug 5 2007, 05:20 PM
orenzai
post Aug 5 2007, 05:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


2and 3 de insect doesn't suit the flower le......
TSkelvinyam
post Aug 5 2007, 05:28 PM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


Later tonight I'll clone off all those busy BG and I guess it will be better.
What do you mean by not suiting the flower?
orenzai
post Aug 5 2007, 05:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


in terms of color wise...brown+green doesnt give a strong contrast...just my opinion...no offence...
TSkelvinyam
post Aug 5 2007, 05:37 PM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


You got a point. No wonder I keep wondering something is not right... brown and green doesn't really match that well.


Added on August 5, 2007, 6:55 pmMore flowers:

#1
user posted image
F3.5, 1/100

#2
user posted image
F3.5, 1/160

#3
user posted image
F5, 1/125

#4
user posted image
F3.5, 1/200

Comments and critiques are welcome.

This post has been edited by kelvinyam: Aug 5 2007, 07:03 PM
orenzai
post Aug 5 2007, 07:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


nice angles you have there..but is this from your garden?sweat.gif oh ya...why your aperture so low can still take so nice closeup? i tot need put much higher? i dunno anything bout it so need ask...heheeh...
TSkelvinyam
post Aug 5 2007, 07:49 PM

May beauty be everywhere around me
******
Senior Member
1,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley


Yeah, these were taken from my mum-in-law's garden. She like planting lots of flowers smile.gif

Large aperture (small F number) will shallow the DOF. Since the object is not too small, so it's kinda compensated. If I'm taking insects, the aperture will need to be smaller to keep most of it within the focus range.

Photo #1, #3 and #4 were taken at the max focal range. I zoom all to the max on my S3 to take those shots. I can have a nicer bokeh doing this than open up the aperture.
orenzai
post Aug 5 2007, 08:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


let me see...if you set it lower means you get wider DOF right...so for close ups...if you set it lower then the background wont be so blurred? shallow means blurrier or less blur?

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0182sec    0.73    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 02:20 PM