
F8, 1/30
Please comment and advise how I could improve further.
This post has been edited by kelvinyam: Aug 4 2007, 10:09 AM
Kelvin's S3is Shots
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 10:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
This was captured in my house garden. I have captured a few with minimum aperture but still couldn't gat a sharp image. The length of bee is about 5mm. Under a heavy crop, the noise can be seen even at ISO80. I used layer mask to apply noise reduction on the BG, and sharpen the bee by 150% with Unsharp Mask.
![]() F8, 1/30 Please comment and advise how I could improve further. This post has been edited by kelvinyam: Aug 4 2007, 10:09 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 01:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
don't know why Canon didn't handle noise of PnS systems as well as they done with DSLR. i also find noise at ISO 100 of my S3 IS too
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 01:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
maybe coz they don care really much on that aspect?
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 03:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,573 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Slave in Seremban... |
The noise is due to sensor size. The higher megapixel per square mm, the higher the noise.
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 04:07 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
so how Fujifilm does so great to handle noise with their PnS ?
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 04:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
prosumer cam mar...but i must admit...its quite a decent performance...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 08:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(CompMac @ Aug 4 2007, 03:41 PM) I got to agree with you. When come to sensor, size does matter.QUOTE(vichio @ Aug 4 2007, 04:07 PM) so how Fujifilm does so great to handle noise with their PnS ? I would say Fuji has a very good image processor. At high ISO, it seems it's better than Digic III, at noise handling.QUOTE(orenzai @ Aug 4 2007, 04:10 PM) For the price of RM1400, I'm afraid we can't demand for more. |
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 08:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
whoa...we here PC FAIR somemore..selling at 1699...
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 08:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
I think even for the later S5IS, many shops do offer RM1400. You get cheap printer in PC Fair, not camera
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 08:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
my place "pc fair" is only stock "clearence fair"...
|
|
|
Aug 4 2007, 10:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 12:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
cha siao!!!
|
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 05:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 05:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
2and 3 de insect doesn't suit the flower le......
|
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 05:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
Later tonight I'll clone off all those busy BG and I guess it will be better.
What do you mean by not suiting the flower? |
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 05:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
in terms of color wise...brown+green doesnt give a strong contrast...just my opinion...no offence...
|
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 05:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
You got a point. No wonder I keep wondering something is not right... brown and green doesn't really match that well.
Added on August 5, 2007, 6:55 pmMore flowers: #1 ![]() F3.5, 1/100 #2 ![]() F3.5, 1/160 #3 ![]() F5, 1/125 #4 ![]() F3.5, 1/200 Comments and critiques are welcome. This post has been edited by kelvinyam: Aug 5 2007, 07:03 PM |
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 07:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
nice angles you have there..but is this from your garden?
|
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 07:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
Yeah, these were taken from my mum-in-law's garden. She like planting lots of flowers
Large aperture (small F number) will shallow the DOF. Since the object is not too small, so it's kinda compensated. If I'm taking insects, the aperture will need to be smaller to keep most of it within the focus range. Photo #1, #3 and #4 were taken at the max focal range. I zoom all to the max on my S3 to take those shots. I can have a nicer bokeh doing this than open up the aperture. |
|
|
Aug 5 2007, 08:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
let me see...if you set it lower means you get wider DOF right...so for close ups...if you set it lower then the background wont be so blurred? shallow means blurrier or less blur?
|
| Change to: | 0.0182sec
0.73
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 02:20 PM |