Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

41 Pages « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 HDR, High Dynamic Range

views
     
razuryza
post Nov 27 2008, 01:38 PM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(Gemeniswong @ Nov 27 2008, 12:02 PM)
Normally you shoot with differencec expose then combine with software or just take 1 raw file picture and use software to adjust difference expose then combine??
*
both.. depends on situation
alesshans
post Dec 13 2008, 08:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
303 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Honky Tonk...


My HDR...
user posted image
Gemeniswong
post Dec 22 2008, 05:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Penang
Only raw file can modified to difference expose? or the jpe file also can?
ck77
post Dec 23 2008, 10:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,592 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(alesshans @ Dec 13 2008, 08:16 PM)
My HDR...
user posted image
*
St George's church .. nice nice notworthy.gif
ahgung
post Dec 26 2008, 03:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
user posted image

user posted image

is this called HDR??
plague
post Dec 26 2008, 03:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
272 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: New Value City



I'm joining tooo tongue.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

iman_210
post Dec 26 2008, 04:11 PM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


my version of HDR.

user posted image
ghoster
post Dec 28 2008, 06:16 AM

I got 4 stars
****
Senior Member
641 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



here's mine, single exposure taken, edited in canon software to get multiple exposure, then import it to photomatix. i use photoshop 7 for my final editing (unlike CS3, it didnt save the photo setting), i cant crack photoshop CS3, dunno how tongue.gif

user posted image

here's another one, close up to the intercooler tongue.gif

user posted image

This post has been edited by ghoster: Dec 28 2008, 06:22 AM
razuryza
post Dec 28 2008, 06:51 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(ahgung @ Dec 26 2008, 03:09 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


is this called HDR??
*
LOL u made it worst... laugh.gif


Added on December 28, 2008, 6:52 am
QUOTE(iman_210 @ Dec 26 2008, 04:11 PM)
my version of HDR.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
which part HDRed? whistling.gif

This post has been edited by razuryza: Dec 28 2008, 06:52 AM
ghoster
post Dec 28 2008, 07:07 AM

I got 4 stars
****
Senior Member
641 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



here's another one,

user posted image
ocz
post Jan 7 2009, 10:43 PM

Cinematographer
*******
Senior Member
2,827 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: MALAYSIA



Do we really need to shot RAW to make HDR?
plague
post Jan 8 2009, 12:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
272 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: New Value City



QUOTE(ocz @ Jan 7 2009, 10:43 PM)
Do we really need to shot RAW to make HDR?
*
Not necessarily. You can still produce vibrant HDR using JPEGs. It's just that some (if not most) photographers prefer to shoot in RAW format (including me).
razuryza
post Jan 8 2009, 12:08 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(ocz @ Jan 7 2009, 10:43 PM)
Do we really need to shot RAW to make HDR?
*
not necessary.. multiple jpeg also can.. if u mentioned TRUE HDR la.. if not.. one jpeg file also can.. hahaha
plague
post Jan 8 2009, 12:18 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
272 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: New Value City



Sametime replied. Cool..anyway, you can get a decent HDR with 3 different exposure (2 or 1 stop) JPEGs. I read somewhere, you can get more detailed HDR with 5 JPEGs/RAWs. 2 stop each is even better.
razuryza
post Jan 8 2009, 12:28 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(plague @ Jan 8 2009, 12:18 AM)
Sametime replied. Cool..anyway, you can get a decent HDR with 3 different exposure (2 or 1 stop) JPEGs. I read somewhere, you can get more detailed HDR with 5 JPEGs/RAWs. 2 stop each is even better.
*
yeah2.. more exposures.. more details..
joyyy
post Jan 8 2009, 11:01 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,394 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


More stops = More dynamic range = more details drool.gif
plague
post Jan 8 2009, 02:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
272 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: New Value City



Sharing my B&W HDR biggrin.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

calvin_gsc
post Jan 8 2009, 02:05 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,261 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


user posted image

taken from KL Lookout Point.
NasiLemakMan
post Jan 8 2009, 02:06 PM

oh hai! wan naslemak?
*****
Senior Member
962 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: KL
Found great examples of HDR here http://www.toxel.com/inspiration/2008/11/1...dr-photography/.
ocz
post Jan 8 2009, 04:31 PM

Cinematographer
*******
Senior Member
2,827 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: MALAYSIA



QUOTE(plague @ Jan 8 2009, 12:07 AM)
Not necessarily. You can still produce vibrant HDR using JPEGs. It's just that some (if not most) photographers prefer to shoot in RAW format (including me).
*
QUOTE(razuryza @ Jan 8 2009, 12:08 AM)
not necessary.. multiple jpeg also can.. if u mentioned TRUE HDR la.. if not.. one jpeg file also can.. hahaha
*
Thank you to both of you.
I started to learn with using 3 RAW from different exposure now.
notworthy.gif

QUOTE(razuryza @ Jan 8 2009, 12:28 AM)
yeah2.. more exposures.. more details..
*
Can you explain more?
I mean about the more exposures.

QUOTE(joyyy @ Jan 8 2009, 11:01 AM)
More stops = More dynamic range = more details  drool.gif
*
Still can't understand. sad.gif

41 Pages « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0235sec    0.76    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 01:17 PM