umm.. broken keyboard with CAPS stuck on?

AMD really good bang for money, 3600+ and 3800+ below USD100. so i think X2 wins in the "best value for money" category.

AMD has no comparative cpu to Intel's E6700 and above. so if money no problem, Intel has the performance crown, until we see Agena and Kuma.

The greenish text of yours, reflects your fanboyism and it could have been a point if it was posted 2 years ago. Your are cute.

eemmm AMD vs Intel again never ending war



This post has been edited by abel: Apr 11 2007, 03:32 PM

That's da reality dude
procs: Intel vs AMD
gpus: nVidia vs ATI

Why so sad ?

Competition is a healthy business, it creates innovation and it also benefit the end users like us who are waiting for good price on those proccessor

If break it down into (in terms of price)
- High end CPU
- Mid range price CPU
- Low end CPU

- Intel win (the King)
- AMD win (IMO best performance/value, Paladin in shining armour)
- donno lar ... but thinking AMD

price war isn't good in long term because cpu company will not have enough resources for big R&D project to design better products.

sorry, my bad.. yeah it's 9x multiplier . Thx for correcting it


come on, those are grandmother stories . Keep it for ur grandma, she might be interested

I think most cc will run their pc with AMD proc nowdays, their price is so tempting!
We won't see Intel in cc anymore haha.. wise move from AMD

280+ can get a dual core edi
so cheap

If my budget doesn't permit me to get C2D, AMD X2 AM2 65nm is not a bad choice either, the 3800+ with 2x512KB L2 cache is a good buy XD

Da X2 3600+ Brisbane chips wif 2x512k L2 even more affordable than da X2 3800+ dude

between AMD Athlon energy efficient and normal one, 65W vs 89W, any price difference? Whats the price of Brisbane 3800+ ?

This post has been edited by mych8660: Apr 26 2007, 01:55 PM

i dun think there's a price for Brisbane 3800+...however, 3600+ is rm 270 from CrazyboyRS thread

3800+ is not a brisbane core..but it's has EE(65 watt) edition..

what's the issue? 3600+ is 1.9ghz .... 3800+ is 2.0ghz .... hence the pricing strategy is like that.

Intel has more edge in multitasking but not really precise in floating point value while AMD has more edge in precise floating point value and good in gaming but not in multitasking.. Confuse huh

Intel=Multitasking roxxor
AMD= Gaming and complex and complicated scientific calculation like u see in NASA to count the axis x and y of the orbit.

This post has been edited by nightzstar: Apr 28 2007, 12:21 PM

do not get fooled by the intel hyperthreading advertising gimmick please,

it is more appropriate to say intel good at video encoding

3600+ including Brisbane is 1.9GHz? I thought they're 2.0GHz

Well those days, it can be compared like that. Intel in multimedia and AMD in gaming, but ever since C2D, use either one is good enough for multimedia and gaming. It just that C2D is the latest tech

well... Radeon wat nightzstar said is true and proven from my exp... when i assemble sc 939 AMD64 CPU vs 775 P4 CPU... P4 is faster to complete cuz i can install more software at once... AMD will lag if open 2 much application...

As for C2D vs AMD X2... no comment yet...
But PD 3.4 > C2D 1.86...