Aside from Perodua, and Proton 1.3 Iriz etc, i can only find these below 1300
Ford Fiesta 1.0 Sports
Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech
Renault Captur TCe 120
Renault Clio GT 1.2T
VW Vento
Kia Picanto

Not small number also....
anyway...they also excluded Electric car in that sense...
but anyway all these above and e-Car is definitely not B40 range...M40 may try for it...until whole pic clear...no point debating...
aside from looking at affordability, should we also start looking at fuel it burns....

i hope gov not subsidy based on capacity, if below 1300cc, both new myvi and saga not eligible too, myvi 1329cc, saga 1332cc

Subsidy purely based on car's engine size is just too simplistic and unfair, just like the road tax regulation. 

Yes. But I am also unsure what is the best mechanism..

Subsidizing based on MyKad, will slow down the transaction, and may cause abuse. Taking my son's MyKad to purchase among others.

Subsidizing based on fuel type seems more balance, an introduction of Ron 91, pricing it at RM1.50 while Ron 95 and ron 97 to be daily float (which would mean around 2.40 to 2.60). Since, most higher tech cars require Ron95.

Unless, they provide BRIM in the form of petrol vouchers, then it fixes the issue. Anyone who wants to get cheap fuel, apply and submit salary slips.

Thinking out loud here.

Yes. But I am also unsure what is the best mechanism..

Subsidizing based on MyKad, will slow down the transaction, and may cause abuse. Taking my son's MyKad to purchase among others.

Subsidizing based on fuel type seems more balance, an introduction of Ron 91, pricing it at RM1.50 while Ron 95 and ron 97 to be daily float (which would mean around 2.40 to 2.60). Since, most higher tech cars require Ron95.

Unless, they provide BRIM in the form of petrol vouchers, then it fixes the issue. Anyone who wants to get cheap fuel, apply and submit salary slips.

Thinking out loud here.

Mistaken identity bro. I'm Jason Bourne.
Currently still a lot of unknown. I really hope they just simplify to one mykad peg to one car below 1.3 and give a cap subsidy. Digging into the income from hasil may take even longer time to implement and a portion of Malaysians don't file income tax.

LGE in charge of petrol price?

IC can be one to be used...but u can't pay fuel with it i assume...
anyhow one of the best reference in the industry is the fleet card
e.g. Petrol company (like Shell) has been given their employee a type of credit-card like card (Shell card?)
When employee refuel with that card, rebate is credit on top at bill cycle n settle by employee...

In this case gov actually can create some kind of B40 card, maybe in the form of prepaid.
holder of the card can use that to pay on refuel
and i pretty sure of coz to avoid abuse, a certain cap/max ceiling usage can be control from there (aside from commercial 1, personal usage shouldn't go too far off)

What I can envision is to have
RON95 is float in a bucket range (gov maintain it within a certain range based on their capability to contain it to help the ppl ease through)
B40 will get the card which can allow them to pay for it at a discounted price vs the above general public (with a cap like probably 200L/mth?)
RON97+ (mainly premium car use) unsubsidised or a lower subsidy %

more reason for LHDN to enforce income tax filing.
the fleet card is similar to what gov use for their vehicle fuel purchase, they have 2 cards...payment card and vehicle card. but such method bound to misuse without proper sop when used publicly.

Can do...
just impose a reasonable limit in the card...
say your target subsidy is 20%
then max fuel per month is 300
contoh: so if u used up to 300, your 300 will be rebate to 240
exceeded amount will not be applied with 20% reduction
(like Maybank Amex now say 5x TP only for petrol below 500, similar algorithm would do, don think can't)

the other way round... prepaid...you can load the card with whatever pre-loaded amount.
and you are cap to use 300 max at a subsidised rate. exceeded and your subsequent refuel is normal rate...

i mean users can share their subsidy, that's where it'll leak.

Can
U can’t stop if they want to
That’s why the card should have a “reasonable” cap, which is make sense for the holder, not “more than” what needed lol

Can
U can’t stop if they want to
That’s why the card should have a “reasonable” cap, which is make sense for the holder, not “more than” what needed lol

But that means the so called 'targeted' subsidy will still miss the target a bit or can still be subject to abuse or profiteering. That's why Indonesia also has not yet been able to do it and still resorting to subsidy for all.

the best way is to use ic as identification with fingerprint and pin to confirm transaction. i'm not sure jpn will be willing to share their info. it'll endanger our personal info to outside unwarranted access.
previously bn moved the subsidy to brim, reduce tax and other direct subsidy method.

Something like Apple's Secure Enclave technology?

the best way is to use ic as identification with fingerprint and pin to confirm transaction. i'm not sure jpn will be willing to share their info. it'll endanger our personal info to outside unwarranted access.
previously bn moved the subsidy to brim, reduce tax and other direct subsidy method.

Let's see if Malaysia can really do a proper targeted subsidy. I'm not so optimistic though but who knows.

more reason for LHDN to enforce income tax filing.