QUOTE(Lone Wolf X @ May 15 2018, 08:45 AM)
Upon further reflection & thought on the valid point you have raised.
That assistance should go to people who are worse off or marginalized communities which are negatively effected by the price of petrol.
I agree with your argument that subsidies should be based on an income principle.
I'm happy to see this discussion going on in a objective and open manner.
#For A Better Malaysia!!!

IC can be one to be used...but u can't pay fuel with it i assume...
anyhow one of the best reference in the industry is the fleet card
e.g. Petrol company (like Shell) has been given their employee a type of credit-card like card (Shell card?)
When employee refuel with that card, rebate is credit on top at bill cycle n settle by employee...
In this case gov actually can create some kind of B40 card, maybe in the form of prepaid.
holder of the card can use that to pay on refuel
and i pretty sure of coz to avoid abuse, a certain cap/max ceiling usage can be control from there (aside from commercial 1, personal usage shouldn't go too far off)
What I can envision is to have
RON95 is float in a bucket range (gov maintain it within a certain range based on their capability to contain it to help the ppl ease through)
B40 will get the card which can allow them to pay for it at a discounted price vs the above general public (with a cap like probably 200L/mth?)
RON97+ (mainly premium car use) unsubsidised or a lower subsidy %