QUOTE(LoTek @ Feb 3 2021, 11:24 AM)
Correct me if I'm wrong...I'm thinking that, if a same fund is listed in both fsm my and sg:
The platform fees will be based on the current value, not the initial investment. So, it is impossible to calculate accurately the difference in cost between the initial sales charge vs platform fees as we do not know how the fund will perform in future.
Assuming the fund was stagnant, fsm sg would be cheaper than fsm my up to 17+ quarters. Highly unlikely that a fund does not grow, and we still keep it so maybe with growth, ballpark, 12 quarters, or 3 years.
Most people (I hope) keep their units way longer than 3 years, so, the initial sales charge method still seems more worth it?
*This of course does not take into account the fact that some (many) people might wish to keep their assets in Sg rather than My, hence the appeal of Fsm Sg.
**Disclaimer: I have both fsm my and sg accounts.
There is a reason FSM is charging the platform fees. If you would like to monitor the relevant unit trust say based on specific industries or region, FSM Singapore makes it easy for you to manage your watchlist. When i click China watchlist, immediately everything is being listed out. This will also helps u in managing your top up or to which sector you want to increase your exposure to.
I am not sure how eunittrust layout looks like but from what i gather with eunittrust Malaysia I don't think the platform is that user-friendly for monitoring and investment.
Or maybe you have build a substantial investment, you can transfer them to eunitrust Singapore.
What I am trying to highlight is FSM Malaysia is already losing out in terms of zero percent sales charge not to mention the choices of funds available. I only buy feeder funds in FSM Malaysia that is still subjected to 1.5% sales charge.