QUOTE(dasecret @ Mar 8 2017, 10:23 AM)
Let me trigger some discussion here
while your points are correct, there's one more item you have not considered
The effective expense ratio is higher for PRS funds that takes a feeder fund model because unfortunately the way PPA structure the fund, the mother funds have their management fee and expenses; while PRS funds management fee portion is not double counted; the expenses are incurred in both mother fund and PRS fund. So although you saved on sales charge; which is one off; every year you pay slightly more on the expenses. And in someone's books, that's totally unacceptable; for me, the tax savings still justifies it
for details on this I'd suggest you look into old discussion on the PRS thread involving myself n xuzen.
I am all pro for paying less tax. Better you save, pay a lttle more, get back your money compare to letting it disappear or who knows transfer to some unknown island. while your points are correct, there's one more item you have not considered
The effective expense ratio is higher for PRS funds that takes a feeder fund model because unfortunately the way PPA structure the fund, the mother funds have their management fee and expenses; while PRS funds management fee portion is not double counted; the expenses are incurred in both mother fund and PRS fund. So although you saved on sales charge; which is one off; every year you pay slightly more on the expenses. And in someone's books, that's totally unacceptable; for me, the tax savings still justifies it
for details on this I'd suggest you look into old discussion on the PRS thread involving myself n xuzen.
This kind of things is worth paying vs platform fee. This I will pay but not platform fees.
Mar 8 2017, 10:42 AM

Quote
0.0589sec
0.76
7 queries
GZIP Disabled