Scenario : AMD somehow falls way behind again
.
..
...
It is the year 2027..
Intel releases the 18700K mainstream platform 'flagship'..
6 core 12 thread, again.
God help us, no thanks. So yes. I won't take away from Intel the fact that the 8700K is a hell of a processor. But I'll reiterate the following;
1. AM4 platform commitment, allowing me to drop in a Zen+ 12nm in 2018 and the next iteration of Zen in 2019 is a major selling point to me. Over the next 2-3 years the only changes on mobo features/design that would make me change a board as well would be DDR5 memory support and PCIE 4.0, and I like that it'll be an option rather than a requirement.
2. The success of Zen architecture is what made Intel even try to be competitive again. Regardless of which camp we're from the logical consumer thing to do is to root for both. God forbid we see 4c8t mainstream flagship 10 years from now, at least now the future for Intel mainstream platform flagship is minimum 6c12t and we have Zen to thank for that. If the next 2 Zen iterations are as competitive as Summit Ridge, you might see the 9700K or 10700K mainstream flagship being 8c16t too

We all win. The way things were going before Zen, your 8700K would have also been 4c8t with maybe a 10% IPC improvement over the 7700K and about the same clock speeds. And knowing Intel, you would have STILL had to change new motherboard
This post has been edited by raydenex: Oct 17 2017, 08:23 AM