Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 29 30 31 32 33 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 THE BROADBAND RANT SINK, Rant about anything and everything here!

views
     
maranello55
post Apr 20 2007, 02:19 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



Ampang connection has been really slow plus very high latency for almost two weeks now.

Made few reports already and apparently there was some problem with the server and just last nite things were back to normal.

I have a feeling Steamy is buckling up for competition.
biatche
post Apr 20 2007, 03:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
sigh.... 47 days uptime.. finally broken... thanks to power outage.

seems like 60.50 is a very stable line... but hmm i think its slow
syaigon
post Apr 20 2007, 04:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
165 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


what's broken.....
BlueWind
post Apr 20 2007, 04:57 PM

Sianzation
*******
Senior Member
2,901 posts

Joined: Jan 2007



Disconnect due to power failure....
KiyoshiJoz
post Apr 20 2007, 09:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


ever wondered why tm has no forums or any complain box or place to complain n give feedback in their webbie?


answer is...if they do..it will be shiet full of this kinda rantings...all of em which are true...but they chose to remain stupid and dumb and act stupid bout the whole thing...

theyre favorite tagline will alwez be...its da best out here sir...u cant get any better then dis..

bullshiet i say...cuz if its da best why is singaporeans getting better connections? are they born smarter? what they sg ppl get 2 brains msian onlie 1? i say its bullshiet cuz TM is GLC and is monopolising the whole damn market...

if there is anybody who is willing to open a new isp provider...with better services and as long as its better then tm lar..( 1mbps? np..as long as its really 1mbps)..more expensive alilbit but nvm.. ill support you..ill subscirbe to u immedietely...thousands will follow suit trust me...cuz TM SUX!!!
vexus
post Apr 20 2007, 10:31 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



i saw stupid streamyx promoter at xxxxxxx. They are so unfortunely keep on bugging me. I shout at them n said Streamyx SUCKS !!! BOO !!! two thumb down.
[W]HIT3_@NG3L
post Apr 20 2007, 10:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,104 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(vexus @ Apr 20 2007, 10:31 PM)
i saw stupid streamyx promoter at xxxxxxx. They are so unfortunely keep on bugging me. I shout at them n said Streamyx SUCKS !!! BOO !!! two thumb down.
*
you did the right thing rclxms.gif
SUSMuhammad Nur Hanief
post Apr 21 2007, 02:11 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
555 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Malaysia, UNITED STATES OF ASIA
streamyx very slow now....
[W]HIT3_@NG3L
post Apr 21 2007, 02:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,104 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
after 12am is totally slow in terms of browsing,p2p,online gaming,streaming
everything is slow
off to bed~ yawn.gif
KiyoshiJoz
post Apr 21 2007, 10:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


finally its back on..but i expect tonite will be dwn time again geeze...
syaigon
post Apr 21 2007, 11:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
165 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


which area is that?

Xybirium
post Apr 21 2007, 12:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Kuching
QUOTE(KiyoshiJoz @ Apr 20 2007, 09:39 PM)
ever wondered why tm has no forums or any complain box or place to complain n give feedback in their webbie?
answer is...if they do..it will be shiet full of this kinda rantings...all of em which are true...but they chose to remain stupid and dumb and act stupid bout the whole thing...

theyre favorite tagline will alwez be...its da best out here sir...u cant get any better then dis..

bullshiet i say...cuz if its da best why is singaporeans getting better connections? are they born smarter? what they sg ppl get 2 brains msian onlie 1? i say its bullshiet cuz TM is GLC and is monopolising the whole damn market...

if there is anybody who is willing to open a new isp provider...with better services and as long as its better then tm lar..( 1mbps? np..as long as its really 1mbps)..more expensive alilbit but nvm.. ill support you..ill subscirbe to u immedietely...thousands will follow suit trust me...cuz TM SUX!!!
*
If I'm not mistaken, they do have a forum but not directly under them. I was browsing their website last year but after that forgot about it. Try to do a search for TMNet forums.
jesselau88
post Apr 21 2007, 07:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
75 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
arghhhhhhh.... tm's link seems got problem. I facing the high latency to most of the sites... Was wondering whether is me myself facing the problem or all the people out there also having the problem too? sad.gif

Target Name: www.google.com
IP: 64.233.189.104
Date/Time: 4/21/2007 7:35:38 PM

1 1 ms [192.168.1.3]
2 43 ms [219.93.218.177]
3 10 ms [219.93.216.141]
4 11 ms [210.187.133.83]
5 11 ms [210.187.132.82]
6 10 ms [219.94.12.141]
7 11 ms [210.187.142.1]
8 11 ms [219.93.151.105]
9 1186 ms [219.93.151.206]
10 1919 ms [219.94.9.10]
11 2134 ms hk-in-f104.google.com [64.233.189.104]


Target Name: www.testmy.net
IP: 67.18.179.85
Date/Time: 4/21/2007 7:35:53 PM

1 1 ms [192.168.1.3]
2 122 ms [219.93.218.177]
3 11 ms [219.93.216.133]
4 11 ms [210.187.132.83]
5 10 ms [210.187.132.81]
6 12 ms [219.94.12.133]
7 11 ms [210.187.142.1]
8 11 ms [219.93.174.154]
9 12 ms [202.188.0.9]
10 502 ms if-8-0.core2.LAA-LosAngeles.teleglobe.net [66.198.112.33]
11 502 ms if-3-1.mcore4.LAA-LosAngeles.teleglobe.net [216.6.85.13]
12 331 ms dcr1-so-5-2-0.losangeles.savvis.net [208.173.157.13]
13 352 ms dcr2-so-3-3-0.dallas.savvis.net [204.70.192.246]
14 2231 ms [208.172.139.130]
15 261 ms te7-1.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.2]
16 2232 ms 4a.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com [70.87.253.74]
17 2637 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85]
18 2042 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]



Target Name: us.logon.worldofwarcrft.com
IP: 209.85.51.151
Date/Time: 4/21/2007 7:36:33 PM

1 1 ms [192.168.1.3]
2 126 ms [219.93.218.177]
3 11 ms [219.93.216.133]
4 10 ms [210.187.132.83]
5 11 ms [210.187.133.82]
6 11 ms [219.94.12.137]
7 12 ms [203.106.230.134]
8 13 ms [202.188.126.132]
9 13 ms [58.27.124.38]
10 13 ms [219.93.173.37]
11 213 ms [219.93.153.150]
12 271 ms g1-14.mpd01.sjc03.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.12.1]
13 221 ms v3499.mpd01.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.6.237]
14 223 ms g11-0-0.core01.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.6.90]
15 282 ms p14-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.237]
16 268 ms g0-3.na22.b015169-0.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.64.14]
17 2780 ms the.planet.demarc.cogentco.com [38.99.219.46]
18 2087 ms gphou2-209-85-0-30.ev1servers.net [209.85.0.30]
19 2808 ms gphou2-209-85-0-113.ev1servers.net [209.85.0.113]
20 2078 ms 209-85-51-151.opticaljungle.com [209.85.51.151]



Target Name: www.apple.com
IP: 17.149.160.10
Date/Time: 4/21/2007 7:36:44 PM

1 1 ms [192.168.1.3]
2 102 ms [219.93.218.177]
3 11 ms [219.93.216.141]
4 10 ms [210.187.133.83]
5 10 ms [210.187.132.82]
6 11 ms [219.94.12.133]
7 11 ms [210.187.142.1]
8 12 ms [219.93.174.147]
9 12 ms [219.93.151.226]
10 240 ms [219.93.168.234]
11 249 ms e2-6.cx1.lax1.as3355.gw1.arbinet.net [204.8.22.44]
12 248 ms ae-31-53.ebr1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.68.102.94]
13 253 ms ae-2.ebr1.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.132.9]
14 2449 ms ae-14-53.car4.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.123.78]
15 * [-]


Target Name: www.hotmail.com
IP: 211.206.123.219
Date/Time: 4/21/2007 7:37:30 PM

1 1 ms [192.168.1.3]
2 28 ms [219.93.218.177]
3 12 ms [219.93.216.133]
4 14 ms [210.187.132.83]
5 10 ms [210.187.133.81]
6 10 ms [203.106.240.201]
7 16 ms [210.187.143.1]
8 12 ms [219.93.174.147]
9 80 ms [210.187.129.168]
10 3011 ms [219.93.171.54]
11 2694 ms glgate194-g2-0.kornet.net [211.216.216.69]
12 1179 ms [203.234.255.154]
13 1911 ms [58.229.14.245]
14 1304 ms [218.39.19.66]
15 1138 ms [58.229.8.74]
16 1124 ms [58.229.18.106]
17 1303 ms [211.206.123.219]

This post has been edited by jesselau88: Apr 21 2007, 07:41 PM
cajun2de
post Apr 21 2007, 11:41 PM

de Reaper
*******
Senior Member
2,791 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Ipoh/Melaka


i'm having the same prob......ping results are all above 500ms average
yangxi
post Apr 22 2007, 01:44 AM

Violinist ^.^ 囧 囧
*******
Senior Member
4,189 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Age Quod Agis



damm nut ,google ping 2297ms !!

Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.189.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=2297ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=2276ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=2296ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=2270ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 64.233.189.104:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 2270ms, Maximum = 2297ms, Average = 2284ms
warez
post Apr 22 2007, 01:48 AM

Team Ayu 「浜崎あゆみ」
******
Senior Member
1,868 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: 地球
QUOTE(yangxi @ Apr 22 2007, 01:44 AM)
damm nut ,google ping 2297ms !!

Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.189.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=2297ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=2276ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=2296ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=2270ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 64.233.189.104:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 2270ms, Maximum = 2297ms, Average = 2284ms
*
Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.189.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 64.233.189.104:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 59ms

How come your one so high?
Hopeless TM.
shinjite
post Apr 22 2007, 03:36 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.189.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=246
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=246
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=246
Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 64.233.189.104:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 43ms


Xybirium
post Apr 22 2007, 09:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Kuching
Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.189.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 64.233.189.104:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 0, Lost = 20 (100% loss),
irix
post Apr 22 2007, 11:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
270 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


after 2 months of good speed, now i feel a little bit slowdown.. shakehead.gif keep getting 60.51.x.x IP..
[W]HIT3_@NG3L
post Apr 22 2007, 11:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,104 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
i found out its the IP address
some IP give good speed and some really really slow
i think its because of the rerouting

126 Pages « < 29 30 31 32 33 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0303sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 06:57 AM