I am surprise actor has a 1/3 chance

Wah boss, you are a pilot?

Don't complain ok, mine is at 94%
But we had this conversation amongst colleagues, the truth is not all accountants and auditors can be replaced by machines, you still need people to determine what scope/processes that the machines need to do and I have the skills to do that. It takes human to catch a fraudster... machine cannot do it without the human input

er.. where did U pull that "With EPF, you are confirm get +2% above inflation"

http://www.kwsp.gov.my/portal/en/member/fa..._viewMode=print
"..
Under Section 27 of the EPF Act 1991, the guaranteed minimum dividend rate is 2.5% per year on members' savings. As such, members are guaranteed to receive the minimum dividend rate in any situation.
.."

Different country's EPF or new syariah compliant wan izzit?

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Nov 3 2016, 08:02 PM

Some tok-kok:


Xuzen

Here you go.

so.. it's just based on "he says"?
and using that as a basis of truth
and also telling others that too instead of the legal/contracted as the "confirm can get"?

cool
makes it easier for others to "make $"

Then I believe you underestimate the potential of Artificial Intelligence

I will post a video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU

Wiki and some reference : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humans_Need_Not_Apply

In short, we will eventually be replaced, is just a matter of time

EDIT : kinda hard to imagine one day we will invest in mutual funds managed by AI

This post has been edited by AIYH: Nov 3 2016, 08:49 PM

http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016...flation-plus-2/

Since 2015.
https://www.imoney.my/articles/highest-epf-...declared-at-675

This post has been edited by Ramjade: Nov 3 2016, 09:17 PM

Not when they still create so many manual entries and calculation errors.

P/s: still quite sore with Cimb ponzi 2.0 error. Feel like being cheated.

Should I say, Malaysia Culture for that?

But we should see that coming within 5 to 10 years

He's saying he'll give his best. Historically it's been good but set in stone is the 2.5% guaranteed. Made sense after reading a few times.

Seriously still cannot accept the mistake done by cimb on ponzi 2

Buat malu only

seriously how can someone fuck it up and 2 WEEKS straight?

does this happen often? has it happen before?

They fucked up the fund size and did not notice it for 2 weeks, while we in this forum noticed something weird on the very first day (12th oct) already. One can check back the previous thread, our discussion were all there recorded. Everybody was dropping their Nav on that day except ponzi 2.0 increases a lot instead.

This post has been edited by puchongite: Nov 3 2016, 11:24 PM

I dont quite understand, they messed up with the fund size? Meaning what effects will have on investors?

Nice video. Thanks for sharing. And google algorithm showed me this which I think makes a lot of sense too. Machine intelligence work well with existing trends n patterns. Not so much in changing environment. N we as human would need to bridge that gap
https://hbr.org/2016/11/the-competitive-lan...m_medium=social

Anyway, I think politics and socioeconomic will play a role in which field and how quickly automation n replacement of manpower at work. The corporations after all still need humans to spend money so they can make money. N politicians need voters to keep them in office so unemployment rate cannot be too high

So I think within my working life I'd still have my job la. How about you? Do you think machines can replace actuarists?

Finally read the mail. Actually the party bearing losses is the management company. For investors who sold, they won't need to refund the extra they got. For investors who bought, they will get the correct units based on lower pricing.
Quite unacceptable but ultimately investors don't lose. So hopefully the asset management company learn a lesson

The impact is more that what accurate refund can cover, as the Nav was overly inflated and that painted some wrong impression to investors which can affect their investment decisions.

English - no difference between targeted Vs contractual minimum Vs "will get"?
never mind - continue on.. music/pianos & cows..

I found one fund with funny name under Malaysia - General:

Hong Leong Penny Stock Fund

That is when AI was still replying on retrospective algorithm, which I think AI now has some development in prospective learning, which allow them to learn what they haven't experience

Social and political factor are important, but judging on how fast technology advance, I wouldnt feel surprise if economics and finance are the priority consideration that massive retrenchment becomes inevitable

Just think about 10 years ago when smartphone was pretty much limited to basic tasks, you would not imagine now with android and iOS, everyone regardless of age stick to their smartphone and tablet

10 years ago, IT in banking was pretty much at its infant stage, and now they are almost convenient enough to start ditching out traditional banking methods, even the rise of fintech is starting to challenge the status quo of financial instituition

So is really hard to imagine how 10 years later will be

That's why aside of being profecient in one's field, we must also able to integrate other fields and skills to bring more value into our work, so that we can provide more sophisticated product and solution which AI hard to replace (although by the time u can do it, AI had already outsmart you )

I will say eventually they will, just hopefully not within these 30 years (let me retire first which is 30 years later )

This post has been edited by AIYH: Nov 3 2016, 11:52 PM