QUOTE(yankiat @ Aug 14 2017, 09:53 AM)
actually I have been waiting for your input
so can I say G7X ii is not a good buy?
RX100 mk4 will cost RM3k.. kinda expensive

furthermore I have a feel this camera is more towards for video than photo..
I like touch screen and if can with tilt screen would be best.. so i'm leaning more on G7X ii now but you said wide end no resolution on the corners

G9X ii also not good? RM2k is a good buy for me
My 2cents.
G7X was my lead contender as well but got put off after a couple gazillion hours on forums and flickr.
Dpreview has this to say.
QUOTE
A Note on Lens Quality
Something we've noticed while testing all of the 1"-type enthusiast compacts is a large amount of variation in lens quality.
In this case, we have one G7 X II that's soft in the corners but great in the center and another that's just the opposite. The lenses on our original G7 Xs as well as a pair of G5 Xs weren't great, either. But this isn't a Canon problem alone. Of our four Sony RX100 IV cameras, three have so-so lenses and one is stellar. But then three of our four RX100 III copies have very good lenses. In other words, your mileage may vary.
Given the ambitious nature of the lenses on these cameras it's not surprising that there's a lot of variation. While you might find a copy that's sharp corner-to-corner, odds are that you won't, but that's the nature of the beast.
G9X is absolutely no go for me. The interface is yucks imo.
Handling wise its the best. G7X > RX100 with grip > GF7 with RX100 grip > LX10 = RX100 = Panny GF >>>>>> G9X
If its not for the XT20... I would've gone for a GF9 in all black. The awful color scheme is my only gripe with my GF7.