G7X ii same issue witt mk i. The wide end has almost no resolution on the corners.

G9X ii is like a even more pocketable version of RX100 mk1. I didnt like the touch only interface.

RX100 mk3 and above would be ideal but note that used rx100 cameras can have all sorts of problems. Too many things stuffed inside small body.

LX100 got evf but no selfie screen It's still thicker than all the above including the GF+12-32kit.

Maybe u can also take a look at used gf7 or gf8. Those are dirt cheap since thet have practically have no resale value but are pretty nifty lil cameras for family outings.

Pair it with the 12-32 kit + 8mm body cap fisheye + something a bit faster like 20mm, oly 17mm or even cheapo 14mm then its basically ready for everything for not much money. And there's also the option for the 35-100.

Yes of course. You hilang mana for so long?

RX100 mk2 no selfie screen how to vlog.

X-A3 got selfie screen but the 16-50 lens is not very compact so unless she do that Neistat gorilla pod thingy. Additionally.. face detection is not one of fuji's strong point. In fact my GF7 does better face detection and the brand new X-T20.

Among all the X-mount lens, that kit 16-50mm is already considered the most suitable

There's the tiny 27mm but that's hardly the focal length for vlogging and then there's also the 18mm f2 but that's too noisy for video.

As for GF7... it's up to GF9 already. It's M43 so of course it can share lens with oly omd.

If your budget can stretch out to RX100V then no need to think di.

With a tight budget, I'd be more than happy with rx100 mk3 especially a used one. I don't think they improve too much on still quality? Except video and general hardware.

GF9 is my recommendation! Panny fanboy lipoting

they all here la bro....

The Sony Alpha Thread

i advice you not to kacau them.
they got full frame sensors there   

Most important is GF9 has full black.

Seems like she's determined to make it her camera rather than an excuse for you to buy a toy for yourself.