i tot G should perform better than E...?
G setting looks cooler since the 15"rim + brakes disc front/back...

FC in between G or E depends on the driving styles...
my family oni afford to have E, haha...

bro, classic is different and classy is different...

classic = old/antique
classy = sumthin like bergaya...dunno how to explain to u ...
cheerS!

This post has been edited by motherker: Jan 23 2007, 02:32 PM

G and E vios is powered by the same engine. acceleration, top speed will be the same.
stopping power, G will be better because all round disc brakes.

@motherker
buy those BMW M3 loh then, so classy...

but still u get what u pay for...

top speed is the same, but on handling G is still better bcuz of 15"rim wider tyre surface applied...
E spec tyre so small like myvi oni~~~

This post has been edited by ltw82: Jan 23 2007, 02:29 PM

nope. theoritically E's performance (acceleration & fuel consumption) is better than G becoz of its thinner tire size and weight (extra equipment like ABS, passenger front airbag, hanky panky accessories and heavier rim). Engine for both E & G r the same, but really u can't notice the difference by much le.

This post has been edited by Singh_Kalan: Jan 23 2007, 02:28 PM

actually you wont see much difference or almost no difference in handling

LOL...yes...for vios, to improve handling, besides bigger rim, lower the spring + strut only can improve it...else wont be much different...

he say bigger rims only wor

ayo... we dun even know whether TS really care about performance or not... let's not start telling him to change this or add that yet lah...

Hmmm, isnt that contradicting? First, you said it's waste of money to buy those cars that worth RM100k and below. Then, you mentioned save money for cars that worth more than RM110k and above. So which is which now? Dont waste money? Lets start with our most basic/stoneage transportation. Our very own reliable pair of legs.

Well, its true that fuel consumption is determined by how you drive but only to a certain extend. Dont tell me it's fuel saving even you drive slow on a Ferrari/Lamborghini with more than 4000cc, V8/10/12 cylinders engines?

Oh btw, pls learn up some basic "england" before you come back here and go on further with the discussion.

Own a vios G 2005, can tapao nissan sentra 1.6 on straight road anytime.

lol gouki bomb 9 him

sumore need lower spring + racing strut...?
haha...total failure for me then, my father wan vios to stay as stock setting oni~~~
better off mode my own car then...
thx for the infos...

add strut bar is not for performance but for safety also ...

altis and camry totally diff price range from vios. the cloeset will be altis 1.6E. that one seriously under power, better off with vios G.

vios will be value for money. good FC and responsive. just a bit cramp at the back.
but please bare in mind, the might be new model of vios coming out this year.

Get A CITY!

Sentra manual or auto? The auto is well-known for being under-powered

LYN quote of the day

Well, Toyota cars' suspension setup is design to be more on the comfort side if you were to compare to Honda. So no doubt, Toyota is very comfortable. Just like how you compare Vios to City and Yaris to Jazz. The Toyota's' and Honda's' have similar suspension layout as Machperson Strut for the front and Torsion Beam for the rear. On paper they are the same but on reality, the Honda is stiffer hence better handling but not as comfort as the Toyota when come to potholes, uneven roads and highway cruising. Same goes to if you compare the Camry with Accord. The Honda has newer, innovative and creative interior and gadgets/technology on their latest/new model. While Toyota's being the rather conventional but reliable, simplicity and durable/comfort.

It all boils down what you want and your requirements and personal taste on certain looks and design.

I mean its true what, dont bash blindly lar. Sigh.