pentium 4 506 2.66
asrock 775i65GV
512 KRR x2
40gb hdd
galaxy 128mb ddr3 7300gt
crap after changing from s478 to s775 i scored oni 6k
nVidia : 7300, 7600, 7800, 7900, 7950 [V3], Third version?. LOL!
|
|
 Aug 19 2007, 04:58 PM
|
 
Senior Member
2,731 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Hell   
|
here's mine
pentium 4 506 2.66 asrock 775i65GV 512 KRR x2 40gb hdd galaxy 128mb ddr3 7300gt crap after changing from s478 to s775 i scored oni 6k |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 05:45 PM
|
Junior Member
354 posts Joined: Jan 2006
|
changing to a newer socket lowers the marks ?
 But i believe , having 20 k of 3d marks 03 doesnt mean you get double the performance of cards which get 10 k 3d marks 03 rite ? This post has been edited by nshady: Aug 19 2007, 05:50 PM |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 05:51 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,731 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Hell
|
stupid asrock mobos...warning to others never ever buy this stupid brand
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 06:54 PM
|
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007
|
QUOTE(farique @ Aug 19 2007, 04:22 PM) IDE hdd.. ol skool type.. haha.. DDR400??.. ur mobo support sata???? if yes u shud change to sata.. ur hdd is the bottleneck maybe that's the cause of low score I guess..  Added on August 19, 2007, 4:28 pm Okay here goes mine: P4 400W PSU Intel P4 Northwood 2.8GHz Abit SG72(SIS 661FX-964L) Kingston ValueRAM 512MB DDR x2 BenQ DVDRW LiteON CDRW 80GB IDE HDD Palit 7300GT 256MB DDR3   |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 07:59 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,731 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Hell
|
not using sata oso shouldn't be that low...me oni use wd 40gb 2 mb buffer oso scored 9k already
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 08:13 PM
|
|
Junior Member
354 posts Joined: Jan 2006
|
QUOTE(Mooneyes @ Aug 19 2007, 07:59 PM) not using sata oso shouldn't be that low...me oni use wd 40gb 2 mb buffer oso scored 9k already what kind of HDD are u using ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 08:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,731 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Hell
|
western digital 40GB PATA
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 09:29 PM
|
|
Junior Member
354 posts Joined: Jan 2006
|
He's using IDE....maybe really that much different ? I dont think so....why would HDD affect 3d marks ? If processor i still can understand.
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 09:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007
|
QUOTE(Mooneyes @ Aug 19 2007, 07:59 PM) not using sata oso shouldn't be that low...me oni use wd 40gb 2 mb buffer oso scored 9k already im refering to overall system performance... not about 3dmark score only.... he shud really get a better hdd... 80gb is not enuf i feel... and urs 40gb even worse( no offence).. haha.. i really cant survive with 40gb... unless i dont have streamyx...This post has been edited by vincentlaw: Aug 19 2007, 09:51 PM |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 11:23 PM
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
 , i don't think using IDE HDD affected the 3DMark's score, in fact, i used to with IDE HDD before changed to SATA (when i'm on 7300GT). for those who curious why 3DMark's score so low, check your driver settings, make sure...AntiAliasing - Off Anisotropic Filtering - Off Image Quality - Best Performance ... and so on, refer to image...  |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 11:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007
|
QUOTE(sniper69 @ Aug 19 2007, 11:23 PM) , i don't think using IDE HDD affected the 3DMark's score, in fact, i used to with IDE HDD before changed to SATA (when i'm on 7300GT). for those who curious why 3DMark's score so low, check your driver settings, make sure...AntiAliasing - Off Anisotropic Filtering - Off Image Quality - Best Performance ... and so on, refer to image... This post has been edited by vincentlaw: Aug 20 2007, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 11:39 PM
|
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
@vincentlaw
 remove the image please  , or at lease give it a spoiler well, the way i see it, it could the driver, try on other driver and see, other things, you can check here |
|
|
Aug 20 2007, 01:04 AM
|
Senior Member
1,634 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Ipoh @ Puchong
|
HDD won't influence much to the 3DMark score, probably is his spec limited him...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 20 2007, 01:37 AM
|
Junior Member
88 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
ermm...i think the one wif lower score is 7300GT DDR2 while the higher one is DDR3..correct me if im wrong!
|
|
|
Aug 20 2007, 08:29 AM
|
Senior Member
7,689 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: The Land of No Return
|
QUOTE(narutet @ Aug 20 2007, 01:37 AM) ermm...i think the one wif lower score is 7300GT DDR2 while the higher one is DDR3..correct me if im wrong! But they did state both are running on DDR3 though.. |
|
|
Aug 20 2007, 10:07 AM
|
Senior Member
1,592 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Poland
|
QUOTE(farique @ Aug 18 2007, 02:29 PM) ahahahaha.. mun tauk awal tek, nak kah senang kerja.. erm im using that card too with default setting i think? i cant remember, but my setting:As requested, 3DMark03 benchmark for my 7300GT [spoiler.....] So low eh.. Is the score any good? Later go Saberkas buy that splitter.. haha Btw, still no response from Palit customer support..  Image Quality: Quality AA: 4x AF: 8x my computer really old comp. agp only support 4x lol. p4 2.4ghz, kingston ddr400 1gb, 40gb IDE lol.. 3d mark03 : 7667 (nice number)  3dmark05 : 3434 (again, nice number lol)  3dmark06 : 1724  |
|
|
Aug 20 2007, 12:30 PM
|
|
Junior Member
354 posts Joined: Jan 2006
|
QUOTE(Miyabi @ Aug 20 2007, 10:07 AM) erm im using that card too with default setting i think? i cant remember, but my setting: Off your AA & AF , i believe you will get 9 - 10 k marks..... Image Quality: Quality AA: 4x AF: 8x my computer really old comp. agp only support 4x lol. p4 2.4ghz, kingston ddr400 1gb, 40gb IDE lol.. 3d mark03 : 7667 (nice number) 3dmark05 : 3434 (again, nice number lol) 3dmark06 : 1724 you're using IDE HDD , so it proves HDD doesnt affect 3d marks already |
|
|
Aug 20 2007, 12:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH
|
QUOTE(nshady @ Aug 20 2007, 12:30 PM) Off your AA & AF , i believe you will get 9 - 10 k marks..... dude, don't quote the pic please you're using IDE HDD , so it proves HDD doesnt affect 3d marks already , or at least, use the spoiler...anyway, HDD definitely affect the 3DMark score la...  |
|
|
Aug 20 2007, 12:40 PM
|
Senior Member
2,147 posts Joined: Mar 2005
|
QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Aug 19 2007, 06:54 PM) DDR400??.. ur mobo support sata???? if yes u shud change to sata.. ur hdd is the bottleneck nope.. my mobo does not support SATAQUOTE(Miyabi @ Aug 20 2007, 10:07 AM) erm im using that card too with default setting i think? i cant remember, but my setting: wow.. running on 4x AGP slot? score higher than mine.. Image Quality: Quality AA: 4x AF: 8x my computer really old comp. agp only support 4x lol. p4 2.4ghz, kingston ddr400 1gb, 40gb IDE lol.. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «  After my 4th test with AA&AF off, I got 7602. Now, Im going to test with what Sniper69 recommends.. |
|
|
Aug 20 2007, 01:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,147 posts Joined: Mar 2005
|
what the hell.. after turning almost everything Off, the result is lower!
This is my 5th benchmark with all stuffs are set to Off » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « And this one is my 4th benchmark with driver default settings » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « That's it. I dont want to do any benchmarking test. All I got was a lousy 7300GT 256MB DDR3 card from Palit.  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0211sec
 0.26
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th December 2025 - 02:02 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.