i think on9 game guah...
nVidia : 7300, 7600, 7800, 7900, 7950 [V3], Third version?. LOL!
nVidia : 7300, 7600, 7800, 7900, 7950 [V3], Third version?. LOL!
|
|
Aug 17 2007, 09:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,191 posts Joined: Sep 2004 |
i think on9 game guah...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 17 2007, 11:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007 |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2007, 01:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(seaotter @ Aug 16 2007, 02:01 AM) lol. how bout "enable if no ext peg"...? wat mobo u using...?no sign. actually i'm using Vista all the way. its just when you reboot after windows update, it will go back to the onboard. and the onboard bios dont really have a spesific command that says " DISABLE ON BOARD VIDEO". waiting for intel to follow up with this. QUOTE(farique @ Aug 16 2007, 11:09 AM) ![]() Here is the bigger size of the card. Not my card though, but its 100% the same AGP card. You guys can see there is the 6pin connector on top left of the card. Maybe this card is a Sonic card, that's why they added this extra power connector. The problem now is, not enough female molex connector.. |
|
|
Aug 18 2007, 02:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007 |
QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Aug 18 2007, 01:53 AM) he/she got the converter la..... gave by the GC package... means no need change PSU la... unless not enuf power to support whole system.... 7300 i dont think will use much power since its entry level card of 7series........ |
|
|
Aug 18 2007, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,147 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(Mooneyes @ Aug 17 2007, 09:58 AM) haa my splitter is the same as vincent's...susah2 jak kau tok download farique...gi jak saberkas ya beli cd benchmark ahahahaha.. mun tauk awal tek, nak kah senang kerja.. As requested, 3DMark03 benchmark for my 7300GT » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « So low eh.. Later go Saberkas buy that splitter.. haha Btw, still no response from Palit customer support.. |
|
|
Aug 18 2007, 03:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007 |
QUOTE(farique @ Aug 18 2007, 02:29 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « So low eh.. Later go Saberkas buy that splitter.. haha Btw, still no response from Palit customer support.. did u restart ur computer.. close all uneccesary aplication... and benchmark??... it will help with ur score if u wan even a better score.. u can benchmark it on new partition(as i was told to do tat, but im LAZY!) hmmm stil wonder u about ur GC power.. hope u can get a better performance after u plug those both power.... else it will be sad wasting money........ palit ah... haih... duno wor... tats why i dont like... even it is cheap... but.. when comes to trouble. then work slow.... Added on August 18, 2007, 3:23 pmGuys ..Pls HELP!!!.. i've a problem since i bought this samsung 19" 931BW(widescreen) monitor.... and im using xfx 7800GS EE..... using xfx 162.18 driver.... samsung digital and analogue driver from cd is installed... im having problem with monitor resolution when i use DVI(digital) connector.... the monitor able to support or its native resolution is 1440x900... when i set it to 1440x900... the screen is wider than the monitor.... (means like when u use internet explorer and u can scroll left and right, happen same to me in desktop)... no mather how i set it.. it is stil wider than usual.... DVI connector wont let me adjust screen size, monitor autoconfig... but i guess this is fixed.... and the image of 1440x900 not only wider but blurer.... everythg went perfectly with VGA/D-Sub(analogue) connector... the 1440x900 res fit in nicely.... but ofcoz DVI is better than VGA so i prefer to use DVI but i cant...... so any1 experience this and know how to fix this? This post has been edited by vincentlaw: Aug 18 2007, 03:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2007, 03:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
354 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(farique @ Aug 18 2007, 02:29 PM) ahahahaha.. mun tauk awal tek, nak kah senang kerja.. Your 3DMark03 Is too low and yours is factory OC`ed version. Even Galaxy's 128 MB 7300 GT could reach 9k++ marks in stock speed. There must be something wrong.As requested, 3DMark03 benchmark for my 7300GT » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « So low eh.. Later go Saberkas buy that splitter.. haha Btw, still no response from Palit customer support.. This post has been edited by nshady: Aug 18 2007, 03:25 PM |
|
|
Aug 18 2007, 05:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(farique @ Aug 18 2007, 02:29 PM) ahahahaha.. mun tauk awal tek, nak kah senang kerja.. Go to Nvidia control panel, click on the advance 3D setting turn the both AA n AF offAs requested, 3DMark03 benchmark for my 7300GT » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « So low eh.. Later go Saberkas buy that splitter.. haha Btw, still no response from Palit customer support.. |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 09:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,147 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
Hmm... after turning off AA and AF in nVidia CP, here is the score.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I wonder why it is so low compared to 128MB 7300GT as mentioned by nshady. There are no running apps while running the benchmark test. I even had the both power connector connected to the PSU. Added on August 19, 2007, 9:49 am QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Aug 18 2007, 03:16 PM) hmmm stil wonder u about ur GC power.. hope u can get a better performance after u plug those both power.... else it will be sad wasting money........ I think it is working. When only using one power connector, the score is 4424 and when both power connector connected, the score is 4441 with AA and AF turned on. Or, maybe the results vary even though the settings are the same? This post has been edited by farique: Aug 19 2007, 09:49 AM |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 11:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,689 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: The Land of No Return |
QUOTE(farique @ Aug 19 2007, 09:44 AM) Hmm... after turning off AA and AF in nVidia CP, here is the score. Yours is PCIE right? I remember my 7300GT scored around 11k last time on 3D Mark03. Maybe its your PC spec?» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I wonder why it is so low compared to 128MB 7300GT as mentioned by nshady. There are no running apps while running the benchmark test. I even had the both power connector connected to the PSU. Added on August 19, 2007, 9:49 am I think it is working. When only using one power connector, the score is 4424 and when both power connector connected, the score is 4441 with AA and AF turned on. Or, maybe the results vary even though the settings are the same? |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 12:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,634 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Ipoh @ Puchong |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 12:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,147 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
Mine is 7300GT AGP
PC Spec: Intel P4 2.8GHz Northwood Kingston 512MB DDR x2 70GB HDD I wonder why it's quite low.. |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 12:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007 |
QUOTE(farique @ Aug 19 2007, 09:44 AM) I think it is working. When only using one power connector, the score is 4424 and when both power connector connected, the score is 4441 with AA and AF turned on. 4424 vs 4441 = no diff... since 3dmark score might vary abit everytime... i guess ur 2nd power plug in has no effect on it...Or, maybe the results vary even though the settings are the same? Added on August 19, 2007, 12:33 pm QUOTE(farique @ Aug 19 2007, 12:23 PM) Mine is 7300GT AGP ur hdd might be the problem.... or maybe ur background application is too heavy.... although u dont see the application shown but stil running in background secretly... PC Spec: Intel P4 2.8GHz Northwood Kingston 512MB DDR x2 70GB HDD I wonder why it's quite low.. Added on August 19, 2007, 12:35 pmso farique... ur score change to 7535 after turning AA and AF off?? but tat is not the default settings already.... This post has been edited by vincentlaw: Aug 19 2007, 12:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 12:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,147 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Aug 19 2007, 12:31 PM) ur hdd might be the problem.... or maybe ur background application is too heavy.... although u dont see the application shown but stil running in background secretly... urm.. me thinks that the default settings is with AA and AF are off. Before I did the benchmarking, I did mess with the 3D settings in nVidia CP. I chose for more quality 3D among the 3 choices available. The example of the nVidia logo is really smooth when I chose that settings. Added on August 19, 2007, 12:35 pmso farique... ur score change to 7535 after turning AA and AF off?? but tat is not the default settings already.... Now, Ive reverted it to default settings and that nVidia logo not so smooth with jagged pixels.. hahaha.. But still, I wonder why the score is so low. Where is Mooneyes when I need him! |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 01:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
354 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
No , It's not AGP/PCI-E problem , I know people who got 10k+ and 9k+ for 3dmarks03 and they are using AGP slot too...Non Oc'ed...their processor somehow is p4 2.x ghz speed too
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 01:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,731 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Hell |
mine is galaxy 7300gt agp la bro...my score with stock setting is 93++ - 94++..x logik la kau mpun score rendah gik sedangkan 256mb...mine is oni 128mb ddr
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 01:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,147 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(Mooneyes @ Aug 19 2007, 01:42 PM) mine is galaxy 7300gt agp la bro...my score with stock setting is 93++ - 94++..x logik la kau mpun score rendah gik sedangkan 256mb...mine is oni 128mb ddr yea.. that makes me wonder.. mine is 7300GT 256MB and yours is 7300GT 128MB both are AGP cards, how come my score is lower than yours? There must be sumthin wrong with my card.. |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 03:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007 |
QUOTE(farique @ Aug 19 2007, 01:52 PM) yea.. that makes me wonder.. mine is 7300GT 256MB and yours is 7300GT 128MB both are AGP cards, how come my score is lower than yours? There must be sumthin wrong with my card.. i've heard tat driver will also cause the score to vary.. but how much it vary im not sure about it.... u are using IDE hdd?? or sata? 2mb buffer? 8mb buffer? |
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 04:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,689 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: The Land of No Return |
It might be due to different PC specs. Maybe you and Mooneyes can list down the spec so people could check it out here.
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 04:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,147 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(vincentlaw @ Aug 19 2007, 03:58 PM) i've heard tat driver will also cause the score to vary.. but how much it vary im not sure about it.... IDE hdd.. ol skool type.. haha.. u are using IDE hdd?? or sata? 2mb buffer? 8mb buffer? maybe that's the cause of low score I guess.. Added on August 19, 2007, 4:28 pm QUOTE(akachester @ Aug 19 2007, 04:22 PM) It might be due to different PC specs. Maybe you and Mooneyes can list down the spec so people could check it out here. Okay here goes mine: P4 400W PSU Intel P4 Northwood 2.8GHz Abit SG72(SIS 661FX-964L) Kingston ValueRAM 512MB DDR x2 BenQ DVDRW LiteON CDRW 80GB IDE HDD Palit 7300GT 256MB DDR3 This post has been edited by farique: Aug 19 2007, 04:28 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0267sec
1.47
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 06:15 PM |