My community falls under 2.)

We have moved in for more than 2 yrs but the the guard house and fencing are considered illegal. The developer claimed the application must be submitted by RA. Is that the proper way?

There is a clause in the DMC stated :

                               1. it has effect between  Housebuyer's Entity and  the Purchaser
                               2. between the purchaser and each of the other purchaser under which each of them agrees to observe and perform the provisions of
                                  this deed and other deed similar to this deed entered into by each of the Other Purchases with the Vendor as in force for the time
                                  being  so far as these provisions are applicable to them.

Our main concern is fees collection. Based of the DMC, is that mean RA and Purchaser is legally binded? Does this apply to Sub-sales?

Thanks.

i saw a apartment project is going on near TI2...already 4-5 floor, is it lavender???

If not Lavender, what else..

Btw, the semiD & bungalow behind your house seem should be ready for viewing before year end. As usual, the bungalow has the living hall at the back of the house for golf course view.

Just wonder when SHL will turn the driving rage (9 acres+) into housing area, in fact as of 2009 the driving range already classified as RUMAH KEDIAMAN.

because the progress is too fast..i thought they are still on booking stage

because the progress is too fast..i thought they are still on booking stage

In practice, some of the famous project such as Twin Palms, Country Heights etc are individual title "G&G" but from legal point of view I don't think so.

In front of SLGCC & TI1 flooded again yesterday.

These photos I took in front of T12 on Saturday, the drain water like teh tarik seem that a lot of sand or mud inside, shall report to MPKJ hope they can do something. Meanwhile may your committee pressure TM to do something too.

they were doing pilling last year few months before they open for registrations, I can hear the pilling noise every night.

If I understand correctly from above your developer has built guard house and fencing but has yet to apply for the approval of local authority therefore making both facilities "illegal" , instead the developer tell RA to submit application.

IMHO this is definately something wrong, the lay-out plan submitted by the developer to local authority should have included building of the guard house and fencing otherwise how to get CCC support from LA?

If really the case, instead of wasting time to argue with this irresponsible developer quickly apply for approval from LA, you may refer to my earlier post if relevant.

Don't forget to publish the name of this irresponsible developer!!

DMC is a binding documents between buyers and developer but difficult to enforce especially after individual title is issued, RA not strong and developer wash hand, just my two cents..

My community falls under 2.)

We have moved in for more than 2 yrs but the the guard house and fencing are considered illegal. The developer claimed the application must be submitted by RA. Is that the proper way?

There is a clause in the DMC stated :

                              1. it has effect between  Housebuyer's Entity and  the Purchaser
                              2. between the purchaser and each of the other purchaser under which each of them agrees to observe and perform the provisions of
                                  this deed and other deed similar to this deed entered into by each of the Other Purchases with the Vendor as in force for the time
                                  being  so far as these provisions are applicable to them.

Our main concern is fees collection. Based of the DMC, is that mean RA and Purchaser is legally binded? Does this apply to Sub-sales?

Thanks.

It is nothing abnormal. A responsible developer will help to assist RA to submit the application. This is the difference.

the view from there must be very good, can see the whole sg long if facing golf club

If I understand correctly from above your developer has built guard house and fencing but has yet to apply for the approval of local authority therefore making both facilities "illegal" , instead the developer tell RA to submit application.

IMHO this is definately something wrong, the lay-out plan submitted by the developer to local authority should have included building of the guard house and fencing otherwise how to get CCC support from LA?

If really the case, instead of wasting time to argue with this irresponsible developer quickly apply for approval from LA, you may refer to my earlier post if relevant.

Don't forget to publish the name of this irresponsible developer!!

DMC is a binding documents between buyers and developer but difficult to enforce especially after individual title is issued, RA not strong and developer wash hand, just my two cents..

If it is illegal, how can the developer build the guard house and fencing at the first place? Developer won't be so naive until don't know MPKJ won't accept such handover on the common facilities if there is no prior approval on the guard house and fencing. My guess would be it is actually the first category, but developer tends to "polish" it as second group, to boast the sale price.

Please take note that when the management is given back to RA, that's mean the DMC is no more valid, because it is an agreement between the purchaser and developer, and not the between the RA and the developer.

For a real second group project, the developer will settle the guard house and fencing issue with the local authority and will manage accordingly until exit.

We met with their SGM last week.
They proposed to assist us with the application under RA's name.
RA is registered but the residents are not co operative.
The Pro Tem members are so lost. Not sure will move forward or dissolve the RA.

When we purchased the property we were informed there are only Ph 1 and 2. Lately we found out, the developer is going to launch for Ph 3.
Even the S&P and  news articles mentioned about 2 phases.

We are deeply disappointed with all these issues.

How come? I remember SHL hand over the guard house of Palm Walk together with the approval from MPKJ, even though there is no DMC or whatever.

If the developer propose to assist that not too bad, engage them actively and go ahead to "legalise" the security facilities. 

This is not the first time this award winning developer didn't keep his promise, check the forum you will know.

Anyway, for the sake of your community safety, this is better to apply sooner than later.

We met with their SGM last week.
They proposed to assist us with the application under RA's name.
RA is registered but the residents are not co operative.
The Pro Tem members are so lost. Not sure will move forward or dissolve the RA.

When we purchased the property we were informed there are only Ph 1 and 2. Lately we found out, the developer is going to launch for Ph 3.
Even the S&P and  news articles mentioned about 2 phases.

We are deeply disappointed with all these issues.