QUOTE(cyberkid @ Jun 19 2016, 11:36 AM)
See post 2504-2506 at version 1, seem that the project is delayhttps://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1403922/+2500
This post has been edited by Palmwalker001: Jun 20 2016, 09:12 AM
Properties in Sg Long & BMC V5
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 09:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(cyberkid @ Jun 19 2016, 11:36 AM) See post 2504-2506 at version 1, seem that the project is delayhttps://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1403922/+2500 This post has been edited by Palmwalker001: Jun 20 2016, 09:12 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 10:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,211 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 10:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,211 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 10:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(danielisme @ Jun 20 2016, 10:07 AM) From bandar Sg long after toll .. Is it mean the car from semenyih have to make u turn at twin Palm then pay rm1.80 then turn to ekve ..? Based on SHL's website for GVH, EKVE should have inter-change at SILK (toward Balakong) to enable Gvh & Semenyih residents to access to EKVE as below.Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(danielisme @ Jun 20 2016, 10:07 AM) From bandar Sg long after toll .. Is it mean the car from semenyih have to make u turn at twin Palm then pay rm1.80 then turn to ekve ..? Nope, the interchange is located between goodview height and twin palm toll. Cars from Semenyih no need to go to twin palm toll to reach this interchange. https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=16...JYBKX8UpA&hl=en |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 11:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 01:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 02:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(cyberkid @ Jun 17 2016, 10:49 AM) There are 3 types from my understanding:1.) Guard house and fencing built by developer / residents, but the management is run by the residents association. Some people call this as FnG. Advantage for this scheme is resident normally pay very minimum maintenance fees. Disadvantage is there is no rule protecting this scheme, residents can choose not to pay the maintenance fees and residents association can't do anything on them, since this scheme is on voluntairy basis. 2.) Guard house and fencing built by developer only, and the management is run by the developer mainly. Units are in individual title. Developer has signed an DMC with the purchaser so the purchaser is bound by some rules set in the DMC. So, there is somehow a "legal document" that require the residents to pay maintenance fees. Some people call this GnG but there are people call this FnG as well. Advantage for this scheme would be the housing area is more properly managed if compared to RA, as developer normally is more experience in handling the issues and generally they are more financially sound compare to residents association. Disadvantage for this scheme is normally the maintenance fees is higher, since developer normally provide more advanced security system to the residents compare to RA (budget issue). 3.) Guard house and fencing built by developer only, and the management is run by the developer mainly. Units are under strata title. Most people call this GnG. Developer has signed an DMC with the purchaser so the purchaser is bound by some rules set in the DMC. On top of that, strata title act does provide protection that every residents must pay the maintenance fees. Advantage for this scheme same as (2) as the housing area is more properly managed if compared to RA, as developer normally is more experience in handling the issues and generally they are more financially sound compare to residents association. Disadvantage for this scheme is normally the maintenance fees is highest, since all the maintenance of all facilities inside the fencing area need be shared by the residents. |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 03:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(ming^_^ @ Jun 15 2016, 12:48 PM) In front of SLGCC & TI1 flooded again yesterday.These photos I took in front of T12 on Saturday, the drain water like teh tarik seem that a lot of sand or mud inside, shall report to MPKJ hope they can do something. Meanwhile may your committee pressure TM to do something too. This post has been edited by Palmwalker001: Jun 20 2016, 03:23 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 03:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(ming^_^ @ Jun 15 2016, 12:48 PM) In front of SLGCC & TI1 flooded again yesterday.These photos I took in front of T12 on Saturday, the drain water like teh tarik seem that a lot of sand or mud inside, shall report to MPKJ hope they can do something. Meanwhile may your committee pressure TM to do something too. |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 05:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,510 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Atlanta |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 18 2016, 03:50 PM) As long as local authority approve it should be alright in fact since resident pay for the landscape maintenance the LA should be more than happy so long no one complain. What happen if 1 day somebody come and claim that the development is blocking their access? |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 05:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
Just found out that Post Office (0.472 acres), Police Department (0.677 acres) and Fire Fighting Department (0.676 acres) in original plan is next to Sg Long Medical Centre and opposite UTAR but all now become car park
While the premise of Hao Residence (3.876 acres) is cater for low cost house now semiD & bungalow enclave with golf course view The land where SHL maintenance office located and car park for morning market was previously allocated for public amenities now both are going to be high rise You may click the link below to see your area, quite interesting albeit the information only correct as of year 2009 http://gis.mpkj.gov.my:8808/mapserver2014/MPKJLPS/index.php |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 05:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(enriquelee @ Jun 20 2016, 05:03 PM) Not so easy as local authority has approve it so far none of the approved scheme being overturn. Visitors are required to register at the guard house every time go in and out. This is not blocking unless they deny your entry without valid reason. Even you have the money to go all the way to Federal Court, most likely you will lose too based on a decided case last year. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 05:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,510 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Atlanta |
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Jun 20 2016, 05:09 PM) Not so easy as local authority has approve it so far none of the approved scheme being overturn. Visitors are required to register at the guard house every time go in and out. This is not blocking unless they deny your entry without valid reason. Ow, got similar case huh. Mind to share it?Even you have the money to go all the way to Federal Court, most likely you will lose too based on a decided case last year. |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 05:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
QUOTE(enriquelee @ Jun 20 2016, 05:12 PM) FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIAAu Kean Hoe v. Persatuan Penduduk D’Villa Equestrian [Civil Appeal No. 02(f)- 50 - 08/2013(B)] http://www.kehakiman.gov.my/directory/judg...29_Presumry.pdf This post has been edited by Palmwalker001: Jun 20 2016, 05:31 PM |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 05:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,119 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 05:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,084 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 05:52 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
271 posts Joined: Nov 2009 |
hi palmwalker..if kajang perdana link open..i mean goodView then semenyih citizen can direct can go via this link (goodview and kajang perdana)...only pay EKVE?
if for now...need to pay silk right and EKVE..if the link no open (goodview and kajang perdana) Palmwalker001 This post has been edited by Stefan_Lam: Jun 21 2016, 06:44 PM |
|
|
Jun 20 2016, 07:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,211 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
The forest there will gone ekve and Langat 2 reservoir
|
|
|
Jun 21 2016, 09:52 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
63 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(samkps @ Jun 20 2016, 02:08 PM) There are 3 types from my understanding: My community falls under 2.)1.) Guard house and fencing built by developer / residents, but the management is run by the residents association. Some people call this as FnG. Advantage for this scheme is resident normally pay very minimum maintenance fees. Disadvantage is there is no rule protecting this scheme, residents can choose not to pay the maintenance fees and residents association can't do anything on them, since this scheme is on voluntairy basis. 2.) Guard house and fencing built by developer only, and the management is run by the developer mainly. Units are in individual title. Developer has signed an DMC with the purchaser so the purchaser is bound by some rules set in the DMC. So, there is somehow a "legal document" that require the residents to pay maintenance fees. Some people call this GnG but there are people call this FnG as well. Advantage for this scheme would be the housing area is more properly managed if compared to RA, as developer normally is more experience in handling the issues and generally they are more financially sound compare to residents association. Disadvantage for this scheme is normally the maintenance fees is higher, since developer normally provide more advanced security system to the residents compare to RA (budget issue). 3.) Guard house and fencing built by developer only, and the management is run by the developer mainly. Units are under strata title. Most people call this GnG. Developer has signed an DMC with the purchaser so the purchaser is bound by some rules set in the DMC. On top of that, strata title act does provide protection that every residents must pay the maintenance fees. Advantage for this scheme same as (2) as the housing area is more properly managed if compared to RA, as developer normally is more experience in handling the issues and generally they are more financially sound compare to residents association. Disadvantage for this scheme is normally the maintenance fees is highest, since all the maintenance of all facilities inside the fencing area need be shared by the residents. We have moved in for more than 2 yrs but the the guard house and fencing are considered illegal. The developer claimed the application must be submitted by RA. Is that the proper way? There is a clause in the DMC stated : 1. it has effect between Housebuyer's Entity and the Purchaser 2. between the purchaser and each of the other purchaser under which each of them agrees to observe and perform the provisions of this deed and other deed similar to this deed entered into by each of the Other Purchases with the Vendor as in force for the time being so far as these provisions are applicable to them. Our main concern is fees collection. Based of the DMC, is that mean RA and Purchaser is legally binded? Does this apply to Sub-sales? Thanks. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0248sec
0.62
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 02:19 AM |