Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

PC Audio Edifier Fan Club V3, where great sound comes to life =)

views
     
nismo91
post Sep 1 2007, 11:42 AM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Edifier @ Aug 31 2007, 11:20 PM)
We will launch another model which have better soound quality than M3300. Da5K bass should be very tight, i think their source got problem.
*
should be...
the 5.1 system is inserted to the multiplied stereo output i bet....
(when i take a peek to the wiring system behind)
no wonder the sounds yawn.gif
however the booth seems to be great...
seen some people bought some items (esp from MP area)
almost get myself an MP221 which cost SGD19 laugh.gif

Keep on goin Edifier ! nod.gif

This post has been edited by nismo91: Sep 1 2007, 11:42 AM
nismo91
post Sep 1 2007, 04:49 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


hmmm...
i thought sing gst already hi...
btw dunno why MP220 is more expensive than MP221 though it cant use batteries... (SGD25)

how about the S2000V at 350SGD?
good price anot? notworthy.gif
nismo91
post Sep 3 2007, 01:46 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(popiah04 @ Sep 3 2007, 09:01 AM)
when can we expect the new model? is it to replace M3300? another M series i suppose?
*
i think the true successor of M3300 should be M4300.
but no news yet. but im still hoping it'll come out.
M4300

nismo91
post Sep 4 2007, 05:58 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(cyew86 @ Sep 3 2007, 06:36 PM)
hi there, i accompanied my fren to buy his E3100 2 days ago. i cant help but to wonder (warning: noob question ahead), why E3100's price (RM169) never drop much considering that it is a few years old model compared to M2300 which dropped reli alot (selling at RM149 now) which is a newer model? i do agree E3100 sounds nicer to my ears but it is pretty subjective rite?

unpleasant experience to my fren coz the technician forgot to give him the cable connecting to the soundcard after testing, he had to fork out another rm7.90 for the new cable
*
i think its because the E3100 has bandpass subwoofer.
overall sound doesnt differ much, but the bass characteristic is really different.
the E3100 produce low bass which is good for music listening.
but when it come to very low freq like for those in game and movie,
you'll find M3300 bass better than E3100.

in clarity, i must say that M3300 is brighter than E3100.

This post has been edited by nismo91: Sep 4 2007, 06:00 PM
nismo91
post Sep 5 2007, 02:13 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(cyew86 @ Sep 4 2007, 09:46 PM)
personal preference i guess, we tried e3100, M3300, M2300, and Logitech X230, Altec Lansing ATP3 and Sonic Gear EVO7. e3100 sounds nicest among all others in our opinion. SG EVO7 is reli bad compared to all of em sweat.gif
*
agree. the M3300 reflx bass is how to say ah... like so flat..
i just bought a speaker that has similar bass characteristic to E3100 last PC fair in SG.
very satisfied with the speaker... just that this speaker no brand one.. doh.gif
cause when i go to edifier booth, nth impressive me except the S2kV.
but of course my wallet wont allow me to take that biggrin.gif

crazily, the spaker that i bought is bandpass 5.25 inch. but yet it's abit heavier than my M3300 sub which has 6.5 inch driver... any idea? perhaps the woods is different? (better sound > more weight doh.gif )

M3300 bass = powerful but "less weight"
E3100 bass = less powerful but got "more weight"

QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Sep 4 2007, 10:39 PM)
can any user of m2300 share the opinion of subwoofer placement? is possible, plz put a pic.
*
since M3300 and M2300 have same woofer, i only could suggest put the subwoofer near to your ear...
for my case, beside CPU tower is good already, compared to below table.

edit:
pics available:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



This post has been edited by nismo91: Sep 5 2007, 02:27 PM
nismo91
post Sep 5 2007, 09:23 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(besaid @ Sep 5 2007, 07:50 PM)
nope,Edifier's engineers designed the M3400 and M3300 in a different way that M3400's satelites and controller wont work with M3300.if its possible,i would pair M3300's sub with M3400's satelite and controller...
*
wah so he controller is not compatible each other ah?
i just know... but for the satellites, can insert M3400 sats to M3300
but must buy a RCA jack... afaik
then you mean M3400 sats are better than M3300 ?

QUOTE(dle4e_2005 @ Sep 5 2007, 07:56 PM)
Thanks for the reply besaid.

I just got M3300 from Comex(it show) in Singapore where I live.
Currently burn in it with my ipod via the aux in.
*
i also attend the Comex IT show and found that M3300 is the best among 100SGDish
i told the salesman and saleswoman that im looking for decent speaker round that price,
he told me tbh M3300 is the best currently, but i told him i got it already...
then the guy hmm.gif hmm.gif

btw good luck for your M3300 rclxms.gif hope you enjoy...
nismo91
post Sep 6 2007, 11:56 AM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


@ besaid:
biggrin.gif laugh.gif
yeah. the controller is different.
however, M3300 controller is differ from M1310.
M1310 controller input is integrated to the sub.
M3300 and M3400 controller are different in physique
but has same interface (serial-alike port)
and 4 same function : mute, volume, input and headphone.

however, tbh i don;t really know whether it's compatible although M3400 controller possibly inserted to M3300 slot (and it goes to E3300 too tongue.gif!)
nvm though, im satisfied with M3300 remote..
(though M3400 is stunning biggrin.gif )

@ghostdev
i don't think so.
it's an optional item.
however the showroom seems to sell it at reasonable price...
nismo91
post Sep 6 2007, 06:28 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(besaid @ Sep 6 2007, 04:30 PM)
haha,i prefer to read than to write...so,diam diam ubi berisi???
no matter what,i really really think that you should try to stretch your budget that a little bit more for the R501MKII.R501 is replaced by MKII already,so most likely you wont be able to find it.while M3500 is just lame IMHO.please listen to both speakers youself and you will understand.i dont want to see a fellow forumer making a wrong decision.
i guess for too long i didnt work with Edifier,my memory is used for chemistry and biology...forgot bout Edifier's speakers already tongue.gif
sorry for my mistake on M1310 and M2300 & M3300's controller sweat.gif

the controller is inexchangable due to the fact that the M3300's 3.5mm jack is directly built onto the controller's wiring while M3400's the type that uses RCA negative (which require a cable with RCA positive and 3.5mm positive)...
*
icic... so it's inexchangeable..
but if it's exchangeable, wouldn't it be nice?? tongue.gif
nismo91
post Sep 9 2007, 09:20 AM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


i'm not sure about that part...
however when i listen to it, i think it excels at music, rather than movie....

btw if you like C2 i think you'll also like C3 (no available yet!)
user posted image
nismo91
post Sep 10 2007, 03:20 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(juniortit@n @ Sep 9 2007, 04:21 PM)
I have see the pic for C3..design is not much difference..but the sound can be better than C2 mah???
*
should be...
newer system on same level generally would be better.
for the sub. its upgraded to 8"

compare S2.1M and C2 = quite similar
future S2.1D and C3 = quite similar
so u get it.... tongue.gif

QUOTE(Doorbell22 @ Sep 9 2007, 11:39 PM)
Hey guys, i need recommendation to buy a speaker systems, my budget around RM250-RM260, my primary use for music, gaming and movies, i need clarity sound and bass not to boomming but at least can shake my floor.
*
as he said, M3300 is the best i;ve audience for the pricetag.
M3400 also good, but personal preference decides... smile.gif
nismo91
post Sep 16 2007, 02:51 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


yeah. my M3300 also like that...
nismo91
post Sep 23 2007, 01:10 AM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


here is the pic of Edifier at the COMEX 2007 sept @ singapore...
(not myself taking pics.)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


anyway just saw a Edifier Decoder called Edifier DE006
user posted image
not sure whether it'll be available in Asia though...
but the specs and price looks ok...
at 50USD and if not wrong could support Dolby ProLogic 2 and DTS.
more info here:
Here
*but not in english*
nismo91
post Sep 25 2007, 03:43 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


nice pic there...
wow.. a pair of S7X0 subwoofer there...
i wonder how it sounds if were blasted on high volume laugh.gif

edit:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
nismo91
post Sep 25 2007, 03:49 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


next time if the final piece of S730 and S750 arrived in the office;
must prepare to run cause another earthquake is coming when a techno music is played! laugh.gif
nismo91
post Sep 26 2007, 12:00 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(iori_argami @ Sep 25 2007, 03:48 PM)
any C2 user here?? wana ask the performance of the speaker?? or is there any rm200++ speaker tat i can buy??
*
some owner said that M3300 kicks out this model.....
but im not too sure as i only listen to it once....

anyway for RM200 i suggest get a M3300 or M3400... smile.gif
nismo91
post Sep 27 2007, 05:29 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(sideshow @ Sep 27 2007, 04:56 PM)
AND lastly is the M3300 and M3310 the same model only M3310 is more newer and re-faced?


*
no only the satellites are the same. the subwoofer is different... and the overall sound produced is also different. M3300 win M3310 in terms of SQ.
nismo91
post Sep 28 2007, 12:01 AM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(sideshow @ Sep 27 2007, 08:06 PM)
But M3300 is cheaper right? and which one has better bass and which one has better sharpness and voice clarity
*
no it doesn't.
every shops that i came to, always shows M3300 more expensive than M3400 and M3310.

M3310 and E3100 subwoofer are 5inch bandpass subwoofer. E3100 sounds better than M3310 imo.
M3300, M2300 and M3400 subwoofer are 6.5inch bass-reflex subwoofer. however M3300 and M3400 bass characteristic are different one another... M3400 is bit "loosen" but while M3300 is "tight"

and comparing the vocal and clarity between M3300 and M3310, i should say there are very slight different between them. it's because they share the identical satellites. (the difference i spot so far is only the M3310 tweeter grille color is chrome rather than silver in color like M3300).

from what i audition, M3300 win in ALL terms instead of M3310.
i know M3310 has a function so called 3D just like stereo widening effect or WOW effect that enhance the sounds reproduction but i don't think that's useful cause my ears prefer M3300.
so does my friend who also audition it and even the shopkeeper who sells it. tongue.gif

QUOTE
actually how to listen the difference in SQ?


different ears have different taste..
some people like to listen to heavy bass while some prefer clarity from the speaker.
SQ is rather general, but the problem is people do not agree each other about the "quality"

if you compare RM100 speaker with a RM1000 speaker i bet RM1K will have much better SQ.
but if you compare similar similar priced speakers which are competitive.
some says A is better, some says B and even some says C.
hence. the best is to listen to the speaker yourself to know which one suits u the best. smile.gif
nismo91
post Sep 30 2007, 12:18 AM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


the new S2.1D (S530) or old S2.1D??
the new one is sure better...
but for the last S2.1D.
some people said S2.1D better than S2.1M while some vice versa.
the nice thing about S2.1D is that it has optical and digital connection...
nismo91
post Nov 16 2007, 02:59 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


hmmm...
C2 M33/400...

u should listen urself...
if me i went for M3300 the other day.
and in the pc show i compare it once again M3300 is my decision.
nismo91
post Nov 16 2007, 10:24 PM

foobar2000
*******
Senior Member
2,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


yes they should.
C3 and S2.1M is higher in terms of level...
if just it's available at that time, i'd get it for damn sure.... laugh.gif


6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.7673sec    0.51    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 12:52 AM