QUOTE(nookie188 @ Nov 12 2015, 12:11 PM)
unreasonable means too much ..so maybe not so good as it opens to the argument as to what then is a "reasonable" amount to increase..
unacceptable means totally not acceptable ..
so I think unacceptable would be a more effective term to use..

Letter to BNMDear BNM,
I recently received a letter from CIMB to impose a RM40/month charges due to loan utilization rate regarding the Home Flexi Loan that I had signed in 2014. The letter from CIMB and Letter of Loan Agreement are attached for reference.
When I was offered with the Loan Facility by CIMB, was only briefed by CIMB banker that only RM10/month charges for the mentioned flexi account, and stated in the loan contract as per attached, and also told by banker that we can deposit into the flexi account as much as we can to enjoy the minimum or zero interest (with partial or full amount deposit without earlier settlement).
HOWEVER, I was neither briefed by CIMB banker and any CIMB officer, nor stated in the Loan Agreement, there maybe or will be any charges of RM40 (or other amount) to be imposed when needed. I accepted and signed the letter offer based on such understanding.
With the recent RM40/monthly imposed by CIMB, I felt like I has been mislead for the loan acceptance. I also felt like as a consumer/borrower, we are unprotected as CIMB can anytime increase or impose additional charges while CIMB thinks it's necessary.
At this moment of time, we are not longer able to get similar offer from other financial bodies as previous offered, and also not able to enjoy developer's free loan agreement disbursement and legal fee, and make me have no alternative but to face CIMB‘s bully. I signed and accepted CIMB's offer based on CIMB's brief and promises, but I felt like CIMB's promises cannot be trusted and being mislead.
Complaint had been made to CIMB resolution unit before this email and acknowledged by CIMB (as per previous email), but yet to be resolved. Appreciate if Bank Negara Malaysia can take necessary action to protect us as consumers. We are very disappointed by CIMB and felt helpless with CIMB's new measure.
Thanks & Regards,
Letter to CIMBDear Sir,
Reference:
Account No: xxxx
CIMB reference : xxxx
Letter reference: xxxx
Refer to your letter dated 22/10/15, you mentioned that the above account will be charged RM40 monthly if Utilisation rate less than 70%, which is UNACCEPTABLE by me as borrower.
During your offer for the mentioned facility loan, I was not informed that by your sales agent neither any of your bank officer about the RM40 charge will be imposed for utilisation rate requirement. I was only briefed that we can put in as much as we can into the Flexi account to enjoy the minimum loan interest. Somehow, I felt like cheated.
Nevertheless, monthly flexi charge of RM40 or the required minimum Utilisation Rate is neither stated in the letter of offer or the facility agreement. This is really unfair to us as borrower, and I felt unprotected as CIMB can/will anytime imposed new charge due to CIMB's need. I am having sleepless night since then, as I do not know when CIMB will impose or increase charges again.... and how much will it be...
Due to the new requirement imposed, I have lost confidence on CIMB's services and promises. Please review your requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
This post has been edited by kinnasai: Nov 12 2015, 12:45 PM