Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

56 Pages « < 52 53 54 55 56 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Skylake/Kaby/Coffee/Comet/Rocket Lake OC V1, Show off your OC here

views
     
Bonchi
post Jul 8 2021, 09:15 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 8 2021, 09:03 PM)
Now I’m trying similar as yours: 4266 17-17-17-37 @ 1.5V and loosen a bit secondary/tertiary timings.
So far looks doable, need to run all tests to ensure stability. Can’t do lower than 1.5V else will error out easily.

Previously I did try higher speed like 4400 and 4533. 4400 still possible but need to relax the timing quite a lot but 4533 no boot. So I think 4266 is the best bet for long term stability.
*
just use bandwidth to compensate with the latency and test it with games to see which gives you better performance. around 50ns is damn good if you can reach 70+K.

No point going very low latency but bandwidth also low. Need to find the balance. iinm if you playing with gear2, better go for 4500mhz+ else best you stay at gear 1 and tighten 3866mhz to 15 or 14.
llaw
post Jul 8 2021, 09:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


QUOTE(Bonchi @ Jul 8 2021, 09:15 PM)
just use bandwidth to compensate with the latency and test it with games to see which gives you better performance. around 50ns is damn good if you can reach 70+K.

No point going very low latency but bandwidth also low. Need to find the balance. iinm if you playing with gear2, better go for 4500mhz+ else best you stay at gear 1 and tighten 3866mhz to 15 or 14.
*
Yea, sacrifice latency in Gear2. After I’m done with 4266, then I’ll try Gear1. From my quick try previously, max I can go with Gear1 is 3733. Likely not very good IMC.
So I feel that 4266 tight timing Gear2 can beat 3733 Gear1 tongue.gif or till I'm proven incorrect.
Bonchi
post Jul 8 2021, 09:27 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 8 2021, 09:23 PM)
Yea, sacrifice latency in Gear2. After I’m done with 4266, then I’ll try Gear1. From my quick try previously, max I can go with Gear1 is 3733. Likely not very good IMC.
So I feel that 4266 tight timing Gear2 can beat 3733 Gear1 tongue.gif  or till I'm proven incorrect.
*
you have to run your own gaming benchmark liao laugh.gif yeah.... IMC luck, mine also not that good. need quite alot of SA/IO voltage to go further, albeit my 3200c14 seems to be a pretty decent kit.
llaw
post Jul 8 2021, 09:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


QUOTE(Bonchi @ Jul 8 2021, 09:27 PM)
you have to run your own gaming benchmark liao laugh.gif yeah.... IMC luck, mine also not that good. need quite alot of SA/IO voltage to go further, albeit my 3200c14 seems to be a pretty decent kit.
*
I don’t game so much and even if I do, RAM definitely not the bottleneck because I run 4K resolution laugh.gif

Bonchi
post Jul 8 2021, 09:50 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 8 2021, 09:37 PM)
I don’t game so much and even if I do, RAM definitely not the bottleneck because I run 4K resolution  laugh.gif
*
oooooohhhh it does brows.gif much more than you'd think. This is why despite AMD being the top in 1080P gaming, it actually kena beat down in 1440P and 4K due to bandwidth and latency.
llaw
post Jul 8 2021, 09:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


QUOTE(Bonchi @ Jul 8 2021, 09:50 PM)
oooooohhhh it does brows.gif much more than you'd think. This is why despite AMD being the top in 1080P gaming, it actually kena beat down in 1440P and 4K due to bandwidth and latency.
*
I'm using 1st gen RTX 2080 only wor sweat.gif sure bottleneck 9 9
Bonchi
post Jul 8 2021, 10:09 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 8 2021, 09:55 PM)
I'm using 1st gen RTX 2080 only wor sweat.gif  sure bottleneck 9 9
*
the ram can squeeze about another 1-5% wan... even in a gpu bottleneck situation. That's why it is quite significant, especially those competitive 3dmark port royal guys.
llaw
post Jul 8 2021, 10:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


QUOTE(Bonchi @ Jul 8 2021, 10:09 PM)
the ram can squeeze about another 1-5% wan... even in a gpu bottleneck situation. That's why it is quite significant, especially those competitive 3dmark port royal guys.
*
Hmm, maybe I should check 3dmark Port Royal score later.
And compare with 3733 Gear1 result.
cstkl1
post Jul 9 2021, 12:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(Bonchi @ Jul 8 2021, 10:09 PM)
the ram can squeeze about another 1-5% wan... even in a gpu bottleneck situation. That's why it is quite significant, especially those competitive 3dmark port royal guys.
*
port royal doesnt require high ram low latency

only timespy does.

4k ram influence is not much except in min frames and with dlss. intel favor bandwidth first.
Bonchi
post Jul 9 2021, 02:23 PM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
There you go llaw sifu has spoken thumbup.gif, dont have to crack your head so much on chasing low latencies. Prioritize bandwidth first.

This post has been edited by Bonchi: Jul 9 2021, 02:24 PM
llaw
post Jul 9 2021, 05:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


LOL... if I want absolute bandwidth, then I should switch back to my previous Hynix DJR tongue.gif -- almost able to achieve 4800MHz. If I spend more time tweak it, should be doable.

Anyway, on B-die, I'm able to get 4266 17-17-17-37 @ 1.5V stable, passing few rounds of TM5 and also GSAT. The trick is to enable DIMM ODT training to find the best RTT_* value. After that, disable DIMM ODT training and manually fix the value so it doesn't change.

Only 1 small problem remain... upon cold boot when temperature is around 30C, will fail memtest. Need to warm up the RAM first before everything passing. So, I guess I need to reduce the tREFI, cannot use the max value.
cstkl1
post Jul 9 2021, 09:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 9 2021, 05:31 PM)
LOL... if I want absolute bandwidth, then I should switch back to my previous Hynix DJR tongue.gif  -- almost able to achieve 4800MHz.  If I spend more time tweak it, should be doable.

Anyway, on B-die, I'm able to get 4266 17-17-17-37 @ 1.5V stable, passing few rounds of TM5 and also GSAT.  The trick is to enable DIMM ODT training to find the best RTT_* value.  After that, disable DIMM ODT training and manually fix the value so it doesn't change.

Only 1 small problem remain... upon cold boot when temperature is around 30C, will fail memtest.  Need to warm up the RAM first before everything passing.  So, I guess I need to reduce the tREFI, cannot use the max value.
*
errr thats not what it does and the odt doesnt change doing that..
llaw
post Jul 9 2021, 11:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jul 9 2021, 09:45 PM)
errr thats not what it does and the odt doesnt change doing that..
*
Hmm... I’m consistently getting error with RTT_WR/PARK/NOM = 80/48/40. This is stock.
Once changed to 120/48/40, no more error. Got this value after enabling ODT training.
Strange thing is that only ChannelA change RTT_WR=120.
Perhaps my RAM is not perfectly identical.
cstkl1
post Jul 10 2021, 01:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 9 2021, 11:16 PM)
Hmm... I’m consistently getting error with RTT_WR/PARK/NOM = 80/48/40. This is stock.
Once changed to 120/48/40, no more error. Got this value after enabling ODT training.
Strange thing is that only ChannelA change RTT_WR=120.
Perhaps my RAM is not perfectly identical.
*
hmmm odd.. not sure how much work sham did for hero but afaik not much..

most of it is carry over from extreme.. not individually tuned like apex.. but then again 80% of apex tuning has atleast 60% common sets from extreme...

here the other thing u can try

but it has to be when training ram at first time so it will affect dram vref.. (disable mrc fast)

set vtt to 0.725 but eventual 0.8-0.85v

see that helps or not with default odt.. also bro ure timings are kindda whack...


llaw
post Jul 10 2021, 02:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jul 10 2021, 01:13 AM)
hmmm odd.. not sure how much work sham did for hero but afaik not much..

most of it is carry over from extreme.. not individually tuned like apex.. but then again 80% of apex tuning has atleast 60% common sets from extreme...

here the other thing u can try

but it has to be when training ram at first time so it will affect dram vref.. (disable mrc fast)

set vtt to 0.725 but eventual 0.8-0.85v

see that helps or not with default odt.. also bro ure timings are kindda whack...
*
Here's my current stable config:

user posted image

With both RTL training and ODT training enabled.
May I know which timing is whack? tongue.gif

Will try your suggestion later.
My actual goal is to boot 4533 with this kit. So far always fail training - stuck at postcode 55.
cstkl1
post Jul 10 2021, 03:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 10 2021, 02:41 PM)
Here's my current stable config:

user posted image

With both RTL training and ODT training enabled.
May I know which timing is whack? tongue.gif

Will try your suggestion later.
My actual goal is to boot 4533 with this kit.  So far always fail training - stuck at postcode 55.
*
use memtweakit..

u will notice something



llaw
post Jul 10 2021, 05:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jul 10 2021, 03:44 PM)
use memtweakit..

u will notice something
*
Hmm... this is what I have:

user posted image

Care to tell which timing is out of place?
cstkl1
post Jul 10 2021, 09:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 10 2021, 05:07 PM)
Hmm... this is what I have:

user posted image

Care to tell which timing is out of place?
*
the public service i do...

user posted image

sorry typo.. its "setting 0 doesnt mean zero, the min is 4"

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jul 10 2021, 09:37 PM
llaw
post Jul 10 2021, 11:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
From: Penang


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jul 10 2021, 09:36 PM)
the public service i do...

user posted image

sorry typo.. its "setting 0 doesnt mean zero, the min is 4"
*
Ah, okay. Thank you for pointing it out. Appreciate your tips biggrin.gif
Time to study some specs document. sleep.gif
Bonchi
post Jul 11 2021, 12:02 AM

KittehPowah
******
Senior Member
1,649 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(llaw @ Jul 9 2021, 05:31 PM)
LOL... if I want absolute bandwidth, then I should switch back to my previous Hynix DJR tongue.gif  -- almost able to achieve 4800MHz.  If I spend more time tweak it, should be doable.

Anyway, on B-die, I'm able to get 4266 17-17-17-37 @ 1.5V stable, passing few rounds of TM5 and also GSAT.  The trick is to enable DIMM ODT training to find the best RTT_* value.  After that, disable DIMM ODT training and manually fix the value so it doesn't change.

Only 1 small problem remain... upon cold boot when temperature is around 30C, will fail memtest.  Need to warm up the RAM first before everything passing.  So, I guess I need to reduce the tREFI, cannot use the max value.
*
your values are a little off so the training result on the RTL is kinda extreme which gave you the stability issues and the reason you need to pump so much vdimm. Best is really just copy some of the values by owikh and ctskl and test it out first then tweak.

56 Pages « < 52 53 54 55 56 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0288sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 11:55 AM