this fela crazy for shaders already, so much moolah to spend gimme some

He's running 4K wo one fury will not be enough lol.

After 2 fury then must get at least 5820k liao lol, 4770k will be bottleneck for 2 furies

heavy oc 4770k i think still can handle dual furies..

when u get one more fury care for some benchmarks bro

my cfx r9 290 clock speed never hit 1ghz at full load when i play Metro last light why is that and i dont see both gpu at 100% does that mean cpu bottleneck? or its just CFX frame pacing way of working. At time one card will hit like 95% (usually the 2ndary card) and the primary card is at 70%.

Metro last light is smooth at consistent 60fps @ 1080p

Yeah,seems risky.

Fury?Should be around RM2400-2500.Close to the Fury X... About the CFX,i've no idea.

If you get a second Fury X,do benchmark eith Unity Heaven or Valley or whatever the name is.

oh... well GTX 970 good GPU no lost on his part if he gaming on 1080p/1440p
Got 4K.. and don't get me wrong.. is okay.. to game on 4K on Single R9 fury X( for me la, what i exp) is good but if got space for another.. why not

gtx 970 is 4Gb la.. just 0.5mb is on slower partition of mem and can use it but will be slower.. if gaming on 1080P/1440p it should be Good GPU
yes.. i guess so, but thing is with Fury X performance don't drop.. as temp is kept under 60C while gaming even so 6 or 8 hour... i dunno about Maxwell... yes is good Average FPS.. but will it be able to kept that average on 6 to 8 hour of game... eh i see most Titan X do it for benchmark..

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Aug 7 2015, 03:27 PM

Should be still ok bah hahaha
Anyway I'm the one using it lol

Ya, only can say he no faith with r9 390

Do you put the framerate limiter or Vsync on? It's common when the GPU is not being fully loaded it's drops down the clock and voltages especially with framerate limiter is on. Enough about bottlenecks already, if the games you play don't give any trouble why should you worry? Metro Last Light is one demanding game when it comes out but even with single 290/X could handle the game well at 1920x1080.

no worried.. no faith on r9 390... even so show Game benchmark and got 8GB.. is alright.. saw pple who lov nvidia they tend to re-sell gpu also higher price e.g. gtx 780 rm1K+.. even so r9 290 beat it.. hmm lolx

before i pakai gtx970 i know bro VRAM x cukup, shadow of mordor stutter fest , r9 290 true 4gb card now 390/390x has 8gb its way more better at 1440p now

oh.. tell that to the guy i reply too.. is just when GTX 970 was best bang for buck all recomend GTX 970 4Gb.. but now is R9 390... but ehm still got ppl recomend gtx 970.. oh fan this day

Fury X looks tempting due to its size but the price doesn't seem appealing after conversion from US retail price
Wanna get 390X instead but I don't think I can fit in my case. Currently using HD 6870 and it barely fits in with a little gap.

It''s The FURY X for me! All the way!

Nano is the way to go bro

Wait for the Fury X2 bro.

that will be the ultmate gaming gpu ever made, AMD needs to max out vram until 16gb

Deng, i forgot about 4GB limitation.

nvm removed

This post has been edited by xonedl: Aug 11 2015, 03:45 AM

anybody tested dx12 unified vram for cfx configuration is both gpu's vram combined?