Waiting for custom fury first...see how it will be priced and perform. Then only will decide..hehe
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V13, Radeon Software 16.5.3, God Speed
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V13, Radeon Software 16.5.3, God Speed
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 12:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,604 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Seremban |
Waiting for custom fury first...see how it will be priced and perform. Then only will decide..hehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 02:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,673 posts Joined: Sep 2010 |
Unseen83 Can you run a benchmark before and after installing Catalyst 15.7 on your Fury X?
|
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 05:12 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
5 posts Joined: Sep 2014 |
So how many of you have tested the 15.7? Any feedback?
Drop your comments on the official AMD thread should you face any issue. *That's because it's easier to track when it's over there. |
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 06:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Apr 2005 |
QUOTE(AMDmy @ Jul 9 2015, 05:12 PM) So how many of you have tested the 15.7? Any feedback? I got around 3-5 fps increase in CPU bottlenecked City of Novigrad in The Witcher 3. Draw calls in DX11 is improved a lot.Drop your comments on the official AMD thread should you face any issue. *That's because it's easier to track when it's over there. Someone tested this: ![]() Frame Rate Target Control is nice but it should be up to at least 144fps. 95fps is too low for the max limit. This post has been edited by terradrive: Jul 9 2015, 06:12 PM |
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 07:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,337 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: KING CANNEL JB |
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Jul 9 2015, 02:38 PM) current driver (15.15.1004-150619a-185617E).. i overclock GPU core 1,101Mhz/MEM 551Mhz.. not increase voltage(as far as i know.. maybe auto?) TEMP during load is MAX 59C silent(idle 30C or lower constant) all runing 4K MaX setting and all on.. zhttp://www.3dmark.com/fs/5347403 add-on: later i update new driver.. Driver 15.20.1046-150622a-186190C http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5347944 Conclusion: 3Dmark minor increase(too minor) THEIF / Tomb raider in 4K Setting MAX!! all is on seem a Minot decrese in Min/average/ not on MAX.. eh look at pic u judge.. AMD you kinda fail or my Fury X just got downgrade from the update.. QUOTE(AMDmy @ Jul 9 2015, 05:12 PM) So how many of you have tested the 15.7? Any feedback? where my free game..Drop your comments on the official AMD thread should you face any issue. *That's because it's easier to track when it's over there. This post has been edited by Unseen83: Jul 9 2015, 08:10 PM |
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 10:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
Tried several 390 and 390x BIOS on my 290x, interestingly these BIOS use higher voltage but give lower temperature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 11:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,337 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: KING CANNEL JB |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 12:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
351 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: alor setar, kedah |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 01:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,337 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: KING CANNEL JB |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 02:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,337 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: KING CANNEL JB |
WOW ! check out Game benchmark score Fury X Crossfire(4 way) vs GTX Titan/980 Ti Average FPS is 10-30Fps different(Metro LL/Tomb Raider) far cry 4 just 5-10Fps different...
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 06:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jul 9 2015, 11:54 PM) Depend on which BIOS. 390 PCS+ BIOS gave me lowest temperature and lowest performance, Tri-X 390x gave me slightly better performance(2-3 fps) and 4c lower temperature. MSI 390x gave me best performance, 12.5k GPU score in 3DMark at 1030/1250, 150x in Heaven 4.0 and 2c lower temp. The XFX BIOS won't work, i can't install any driver and GPU-Z only show blanks. None of these BIOSes overclock well for me which is expected. QUOTE(arifhasim85 @ Jul 10 2015, 12:10 AM) No idea.. maybe these 390/390x BIOS have better load adjustment. |
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 10:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,167 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: ..Tsukuba.. |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Jul 10 2015, 06:33 AM) Depend on which BIOS. can the 390 bios work on my 290 ?390 PCS+ BIOS gave me lowest temperature and lowest performance, Tri-X 390x gave me slightly better performance(2-3 fps) and 4c lower temperature. MSI 390x gave me best performance, 12.5k GPU score in 3DMark at 1030/1250, 150x in Heaven 4.0 and 2c lower temp. The XFX BIOS won't work, i can't install any driver and GPU-Z only show blanks. None of these BIOSes overclock well for me which is expected. No idea.. maybe these 390/390x BIOS have better load adjustment. |
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 10:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
After upgrading to Win 10 TP and Catalyst 15.7 I can OC my A10 7850K iGPU to 1028MHz stable, even after extensive gaming period. Previously it couldn't exceed 100MHz or else the system would crash in Windows. Not sure what sorcery is this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 10:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Apr 2005 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Jul 10 2015, 06:33 AM) Depend on which BIOS. wtf390 PCS+ BIOS gave me lowest temperature and lowest performance, Tri-X 390x gave me slightly better performance(2-3 fps) and 4c lower temperature. MSI 390x gave me best performance, 12.5k GPU score in 3DMark at 1030/1250, 150x in Heaven 4.0 and 2c lower temp. The XFX BIOS won't work, i can't install any driver and GPU-Z only show blanks. None of these BIOSes overclock well for me which is expected. No idea.. maybe these 390/390x BIOS have better load adjustment. I got around that 12.5k GPU score in 3DMark but mine running at 1150/1500 This post has been edited by terradrive: Jul 10 2015, 10:18 AM |
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,604 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Seremban |
Remember when AMD posted that they were hiring programmers for driver development? Guess it is starting to produce results.
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 11:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
742 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Shaw or West End or Foggy Bottom or somewhere else |
2way CFX/SLI scale much better than 3way CFX/SLI.
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Card...GPU-Performance |
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 11:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,167 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: ..Tsukuba.. |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Jul 10 2015, 10:14 AM) After upgrading to Win 10 TP and Catalyst 15.7 I can OC my A10 7850K iGPU to 1028MHz stable, even after extensive gaming period. Previously it couldn't exceed 100MHz or else the system would crash in Windows. Not sure what sorcery is this. Amd is a sorcerer now, looks like I need to jump to win10 now |
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 12:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,241 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
|
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 01:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,669 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « LOL |
|
|
Jul 10 2015, 01:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Apr 2005 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0232sec
0.53
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 10:54 AM |