Dont think any brand is giving warranty on clogging except Aquaphor
Been tested in old condos with very bad water condition and without an outdoor filter, can last one year.
[Home Appliances] Water Filter/Purifier Thread V2, Drinking Water Treatment System
|
|
Oct 28 2017, 02:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#341
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
FOr easy maintenance and high usage, AQUAPHOR Crystal Eco comes with 1 year warranty even for clogging (home usage only) not applicable for business
Dont think any brand is giving warranty on clogging except Aquaphor Been tested in old condos with very bad water condition and without an outdoor filter, can last one year. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 30 2017, 05:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#342
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(jo707 @ Oct 28 2017, 09:00 PM) Sorry to burst your bubble. I have nothing to sell here. You are accusing anyone doubting the integrity of your product as your competitor. Lab tested with Permulalab which is a lab accredited by our local MOH, tested on drinking water quality and pass the test as shown and posted many times, i bliv u saw itI have 3M at home, and Amway Espring as well. Both bought from the sellers in Lowyat. So are you saying i am selling Amway since i have it? Sad to say none of your published test results able to show your product is safe to drink for 8000L/1 year. Just one word answer, Yes or No? Tested and passed LGA european standards also posted the certificates and test result. U saw it as well. TESTED in BOTH EUROPE AND MALAYSIA, IT IS SAFE TO DRINK » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « The way u reply and the words u use, it is more like a competitor trying to sabotage, that is why i asked members to read your previous posting and decide. Genuine customers asked politely and i reply nicely, but the way u post is like trying to condemn my product and not asking for the sake of gaining knowledge This post has been edited by zheilwane: Oct 30 2017, 05:54 PM |
|
|
Nov 2 2017, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#343
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(Ch33r @ Nov 2 2017, 10:26 AM) Ya, what i means is if the usage is large compare to the usage which is small, both aso need to change the filter for 1 year time? Even ESPRING recommend to change yearly or follow capacity. From what i know majority water filter manufacturers recommend capacity or yearly because, even u dont use water, as long as the filter is activated (submerge in water) the performance of the carbon block will drop overtime. It is impossible for us to tell when exactly to change, clear water does not mean clean water. Example, when it is brand new, chlorine reduction 99%, after one year it is 90%, still very good but for the best quality, manufacturer recommend to change it. NSF suggest 50% chlorine reduction is already sufficient. We cant wait until our water to have smell only change, bt that time we are already drinking a lot of contaminated water without knowing. Why do we wanna drink the extra 40% chlorine even though it is safe, it is still a chemical. If a household usage is large then they change the filter for once a year which it is the limit, then for those small usage household they still need to change once a year even usage of the filter not so frequent? Something like not accurate and wasted. After one year, it is not said that the cartridge will expire and your water is poisonous, it is still clean but not as clean as claimed. Hence, for optimum performance and the best water quality, better change. You may also continue using it at your own risk, i do have customers who change it 1.5 year once, i believe many customers would do so as well. I used to sell 3M DWS 1000 and it has an indicator meter, my customers reset it, never follow the indicator as they say is too costly to replace regularly (7 - 8 months reach capacity) . . . . Talking about capacity, Panasonic alkaline with a small cartridge (half membrane and half carbon) claim to have 12,000L capacity. 3M CTM-01 a small single stage carbon block capacity 4000L. Why double stage 3M DWS 1000 only claim 2400L ? That is why i always explain, the capacity is just an estimation and not accurate, depending on your incoming water quality as well. Normal household of 3 - 4 ppl use not more than 4000L per year, hence i recommend to change yearly rather follow the 8000L capacity.If still worry and do not trust the recommended capacity, buy some basic water testing kit and test at home regularly, if within one year, the test is not acceptable, that means the filter is not good enough for you home and time to upgrade to a better filter. Note : those test kits can only test a few parameters and not very accurate to determine water is good quality or not, still recommend to change yearly even pass the simple test results This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 2 2017, 12:13 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Nov 2 2017, 02:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#344
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(Ch33r @ Nov 2 2017, 01:57 PM) How do we know that when we need to change the Aquaphor filter if the household usage is large? Is it also change it once a year? Does it have any solution or way that we can know the actual filter changing time for large usage household like 8 to 9 person? Assume we drink 1.5L water a day (some people dont bring their own water to office) Household of 6 ppl drinking consumption 6ppl x 1.5L x 365 days = 3285L For cooking assuming cook everyday 2L x 365days = 730ml Estimated usage per year = 3285 + 730 = 4015L. So based on my estimation, household of 6ppl use about 4000L per year only. In fact, not every one drink 1.5L water from home. So, if you have a big family and worry and wanna be accurate, can always buy a meter to check on the usage and buy some test kit to test. No indicator measure water quality, is either by a 1 year countdown timer or based on capacity. So, nothing is 100% accurate unless labtest. |
|
|
Nov 2 2017, 03:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#345
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
Yes, espring have a chip and u can find lots of info on it but it does not measure the water quality. The warning to replace cartridge is based on 1 year or 5000L capacity.
So, if you wan to really monitor on the water usage, can buy a water meter. Some nowadays are so advanced, connected to home wifi and u can monitor with your phone. but cost $$$. Or just get a regular low meter less than RM 100 |
|
|
Nov 3 2017, 10:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#346
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(oyching88 @ Nov 3 2017, 09:56 PM) According to the source below ranging from $1500-$2000 depending on the number and types of products to be approved. Different standard cost differently, you can contact NSF for the price. http://www.bpiworld.org/Resources/Document...012%20Final.pdf QUOTE(outpace @ Nov 3 2017, 12:41 PM) Actually i tried emailing NSF, no definite answer on the costing. From what i was told by aquaphor is estimated USD 30k. They need to pay for their air tickets, accommodation and other expenses, need to check a few times. As per the website given, $1,500 - 2000 depending on number and types of product. Hence, i guess $ 2000 is for a basic test may b NSF 42 only or some cheaper standard less parameters tested. Also mentioned "US Composting Council member" can get cheaper licensing fee. FOr US based companies they use NSF as it is well known there and cheaper to test. Brands like 3M and culligan have many water filtration products, hence getting all products tested and certified would be much cheaper compared to Aquaphor just pay NSF to test on CRYSTAL ECO one model. To Aquaphor, in RUSSIA and other european countries (their main business) customers do recognize LGA and that is why they do not need NSF (no demand for it) Due to the request is only from MALAYSIA specifically lowyat forum only, it is not profitable for them to spend such amount of money. Why not think the other way why Espring and 3M do not have LGA? why they didtn apply for LGA? Since NSF is well known and established in US definitely 3M & Espring do not need LGA. Samething Aquaphor do not need NSF. Just different certification like if u work in AUS accounting u need CPA they wont recognised your MIA (malaysia cert) but u work in malaysia some companies do recognize MIA. Why no reply from AQUAPHOR because the person in charge went to Amsterdam for AQUATECH expo. Aquaphor is an international brand and yes it is from RUSSIA. They are not any china OEM brands, u can google and find them in many European countries. For example Aquatech Amsterdam is not any ABC company can participate, you need to have certain quality and criteria to join this expo. This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 3 2017, 10:49 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2017, 12:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#347
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(arju @ Nov 3 2017, 11:07 PM) Espring selling price is around RM 3.2 - 3.8k i believe different seller offer different rate. Replacement should be around RM 550Aquaphor selling price is RM 1699 sometimes can get lower. Replacement is RM 450 I have sample for both filters, i dont sell espring but i got their sample and several other brands as well for comparison. Some i purchase and some traded in with customers This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 4 2017, 12:29 AM |
|
|
Nov 4 2017, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#348
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(woodiewo @ Nov 4 2017, 01:49 PM) Good info bro. hope i am not too late i just booked a myway.my life membrane 930. hope its good ... please advice googled, cant find anything on this brand. should be +- the same as other membrane filters.This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 4 2017, 05:02 PM |
|
|
Nov 4 2017, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#349
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(exsakai @ Nov 4 2017, 07:34 AM) As a user of both nsf and lga water filters. Here is my comment. thanks bro, really good to have customers like to who always help me to comment Trusted NSF or may be blindly believed in them after reading this forum as it seems like everyone is taking about nsf. So decided to buy 3m ap easy as it is within my budget and has nsf. Capacity rated 2k+ but 3 to 4 months already clogged, my usage is low estimated 600L. So i called up 3m and asked why, they say my area water is dirty and capacity rated is for USA, when my filter is clogged meaning the filter is doing a good job in blocking the dirt, so nothing wrong with my filter. Do you know how costly it is to change the filter? Would cost me rm 1k+- per year Later switched to Aquaphor as i trusted zheilwane. Bought some kitchen appliances and other stuff from him. Always help me to resolve my issues patiently. When zheilwane cut my ap easy filter and compared with his aquaphor, the filter inside is so small and for the price i am paying, felt cheated by NSF. As posted, you guys can check my previous posting, used aquaphor more than 1 year only change the filter, no issues and water taste great. All the best bro, hope you could get you more biz. Giv me more discount when i buy my filter bext year ya hahaha. This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 4 2017, 05:03 PM |
|
|
Nov 6 2017, 08:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#350
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(exsakai @ Nov 5 2017, 04:42 PM) During my previous search to replace 3m, many sellers PMed me. Lowest can get rm 3300 with 12 months instalment plans. As per websiteThat is why i know this thread is mainly amway sellers already and that is why the NSF bcome a main selling point here. Really, could not understand why my ap easy can pass nsf, so easy to obtain nsf? Such a lousy filter can pass nsf. https://www.nsf.org/newsroom_pdf/water_42_53_insert.pdf NSF/ANSI 42 establishes the minimum requirements for the certification of POU/POE filtration systems designed to reduce specific aesthetic or non-health-related contaminants (chlorine, taste, odor and particulates) that may be present in public or private drinking water. NSF/ANSI 53 establishes the minimum requirements for the certification of POU/POE filtration systems designed to reduce specific health-related contaminants, such as Cryptosporidium, lead, volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) and asbestos that may be present in public or private drinking water. What is Carbon filtering? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_filtering Active charcoal carbon filters are most effective at removing chlorine (NSF 42), sediment, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (NSF53), taste and odor from water. As long as it is a genuine carbon block filter, no matter it is small like culligan or your previous filter or big like Espring, they will also PASS NSF. Carbon Block in nature is able to remove Chlorine, taste & odor which satisfy the criteria of NSF 42 and VOCs which falls under NSF 53. This answers your question why your previous filter is able to PASS NSF. Here is a sample of a NSF performance data sheet, NSF requirement for chlorine reduction 50% only, they set the standard so LOW, no wonder basic carbon block filters can pass. 1) Chlorine 2) Nominal Particulate 3) Cyst 4) Lead 5) MTBE 6) Turbidity 7) VOC Why there is a need for NSF? TO make sure manufacturers do not give poor quality filters that what they claim as NSF will periodically check on them. For example, there are factories that produces activated carbon but label them as carbon block, who knows what is inside the filter until we break it up. Or may be they give u other things are are cheap, nowadays people even make fake eggs and rice. THere could be fake carbon block as well. So NSF is here to prevent that from happening. Aquaphor has LGA and also ISO9001 to certify both quality and management control. International brand with strict quality control, not like a regular OEM no name china company. I always recommend customers to break their cartridges after replacement and see how dirty the cartridge inside and also to verify are they getting what i claim and posted all the time. This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 6 2017, 09:01 PM |
|
|
Nov 6 2017, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#351
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(exsakai @ Nov 6 2017, 06:46 PM) Yup u mentioned different grades and level. If what u meant same level is by having standard 42 and 53 then ap easy also same level as espring. That is very misleading and forumers will end up buying cheap filters with nsf thinking they are the same. So why would consumer buy dws or espring? Unfortunately NSF do not rank the filters, hence if customers blindly rely on NSF 53 only and buy filters, they might not get the right one. For example, NSF 53, VOC requirement reduction 95% , some filters can do 99% but also ranked as pass only. If your water supply is heavily polluted like the HK case, a normal standard 53 filter can filter 95% VOC is you are using normal tap water but if it is heavily polluted, how long can it last? During the whole capacity is able to achieve 95%? impossible. That is why you need to consider the quality of the carbon block as well. The thickness, the density, the grade other technologies included in manufacturing the block.Same example here, if hk authority instruct to buy filters with nsf 53. Then many would just buy ap easy or culligan which is much cheaper, why buy expensive filters like espring? From my understanding, not all filters with nsf 53 are equally good. Nsf did not provide a clear indication how good espring nsf 53 vs a cheap ap easy with nsf 53 as well. This is the mistake that i made and want to point out. Never think all filters with nsf are equally good. Filters with nsf do not mean they are more superior it is just a basic guideline to follow. |
|
|
Nov 7 2017, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#352
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(aeiou228 @ Nov 7 2017, 10:32 AM) Gee..! A PoE filter used as PoU prefilter head only RM 32 ? or the connection part only. If RM 32 for head, might as well buy the head + cartridge separately. sorry cant read mandarinAs for your concern about people stealing it, I'm of the opinion that petty thief is more interested in your branded snickers then dismantling a water filter. The only value left for the thief is the AP902 filter head as he wouldnt know for sure how long the cartridge has been used. 3M AP902 filter head is only RM32 in Taobao. No need so susah to steal Ops! Profiteers is going to curse me for breaking their rice bowl. Sorry profiteers [attachmentid=9308418] Water has chlorine, since AP902 is just cloth and does not remove chlorine only remove sediments upto 5 micron. SO, if used as sediment filtration, u can use it until it gets clogged, 2 or 3 years also no problem. If this is mainly used as a drinking filter then definitely it is nothing compared to the proper filters like DWS1000 or Aquaphor eco or Espring as AP902 is just a basic sediment filter upto 5 micron while drinking filters 0.5 micron and below This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 7 2017, 11:47 AM |
|
|
Nov 7 2017, 11:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#353
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(aeiou228 @ Nov 6 2017, 09:47 PM) Zheilwane Bro, I did some reading about Ultrafiltration membrane (UF) and found that UF can filter 0.01 micron pure water as clean as RO water or UV treated water but with lower maintenance cost, no water wastage and does not need electricity. May I know your Crystal ECO main filter K7B which is using hollow fibre membrane, are there same as UF ? Micro Filtration = 0.1 micronUltra Filtration = 0.01 micron RO Filtration = 0.001 micron Aquaphor Crystal Eco is using Hollow Fibre membrane categorize as micro filtration (0.1 micron) Our Multipore POE filter and many other membrane POE filter is the market are categorized as UF (ultrafiltration) 0.01 micron So common asked question, if we install Multipore Membrane as POE (0.01 micron) wont our POU Aquaphor Eco (0.1micron) become redundant? Answer is NO. UF can only filter sediments and bacteria down to 0.01 micron, but it is unable to filter VOCs, chemicals and etc etc such as chlorine. For those things, u need a good carbon filter. Even RO system with 0.0001 micron has to be coupled with a few carbon blocks to work properly. This reminded me of something. NSF standard 42 and 53 do not cover BACTERIA. So, a basic carbon block filter like those RM 500+ do not have bacteria filtration membrane or uv light. This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 7 2017, 12:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2017, 02:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#354
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(thailover @ Nov 7 2017, 02:35 PM) Buy something u feel comfortable. If u r not comfortable with Russian Products then get 3M since u already got their AP902. We have spoken on the phone, i know you prefer branded stuff and that is why u got AP902 in the first place (not recommended by me and actually against my recommendation but already purchased, too bad). So, i do not wan to push you to get something u do not trust. For a peace of mind as what forumers suggested, get 3M. DWS2500 is the best spec under 3M. I can pre-order and still getting below market price This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 7 2017, 03:01 PM |
|
|
Nov 9 2017, 10:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#355
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
as promised here is the reply from AQUAPHOR HQ on the endurance labtest of 8000L capacity. PDF file is original scanned copy in RUSSIAN, doc file is translated to english by google
https://www.sendspace.com/file/mssyhg As per report in russian and translated version to english by google THe endurance test was done by Institute of Toxicology FMBA of Russia (Accreditation certificate NoROSS RU.0001.51472b ) The tests were carried out in accordance with "GOST R 51871-2002" This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 9 2017, 10:51 AM |
|
|
Nov 10 2017, 10:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#356
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(weikee @ Nov 9 2017, 06:43 PM) You need to go ask NSF, and 3M don't ask me. If you feel cheated please express your dissatisfaction to 3M, they also have facebook. as explained getting it is too costly and not feasible for Aquaphor which is European country not in USA. With LGA and huge demand in european countries, they do not need NSF. https://www.facebook.com/3M/ Or perhaps you can ask the other water filter company why never take NSF certificate if you think is not hard. So why other brands no LGA ? why no Sirim? why no WQA? impossible for you to register all unless demanded by projects or majority customers. Facts/figures and also customer feedback from exsakai has already proven one point, with NSF does not make u a more superior filter. Even cheap and basic filters can pass NSF as stated. If if the requirements are high, basic filters shouldnt pass. The fact that even simple carbon block can pass, how can customers just rely on NSF. Every1 would just buy the cheapest filter with NSF, why manufacturers bother to produce better filters Like an accountant already have CPA, do u think he wanna go take MIA & ACCA? NO unless required by company to get a high pay job. FYI i have many customers switching from products with NSF to AQUAPHOR with LGA cert. Such as exsakai and Theused85, both commented they are happier after switching. This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 10 2017, 10:19 AM |
|
|
Nov 10 2017, 10:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#357
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2017, 11:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#358
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(oyching88 @ Nov 10 2017, 06:26 PM) Aquaphor applied NSF for DWM101 (RO system) because this is their main selling product in USA. To penetrate US market and due to high demand for NSF, that is why they invested to get NSF there. Malaysia alone figure is too low. If i wan to sell something with NSF just to satisfy the need for nsf, i could sell DWM101 but did i ?. This shows that I did not blindly choose my product If you wan NSF i can sell DWM101 for RM 2k+, still much cheaper than espring, definitely cleaner than amway water since it is RO system. I could just save all the trouble and sell DWM101 to counter amway sellers here. Why would i waste so much time replying and explaining. This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 11 2017, 11:41 AM |
|
|
Nov 11 2017, 11:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#359
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(exsakai @ Nov 10 2017, 10:59 PM) All i wanted to share my experience having nsf does not mean it is more superior, still need to look at the product spec and other info to compare. Photos and info already shared, for those who r looking for filters, do read my posting as reference. Relax bro, over already. I can see your point here. Thanks for your effort in sharing. Yup, you are right, they are sellers like me. That is why i always suggest people to check on history post, then u can guess they are seller or genuine forumers.However, you people never reply to my question, deviate it to other unrelated info and once again keep repeating nsf. That is how forumers like me got confused thinking that nsf is a must and with it means the filter is of superior quality Question asked, if nsf is so great and hard to obtain, why a basic mini size carbon block can pass nsf? Then give me links with many pages and unrelated stuff about nsf again, did not clearly explain. Then now cucuk aquaphor pulak, so not professional. 1) Oyching88 & cheer - amway seller 2) weikee pro NSF duno seller or buyer 3) zheilwane - aquaphor seller So mainly these few people replying only. I didnt say NSF is no good, i emphasize that do not blindly trust it. Since there are no real users like me disccusing here, pointless for me to comment further as it seems like i am only talking to sellers here who are promoting their products with NSF. End of my story, wasted my effort and time. Now only notice those replying are sellers. Same here, topic closed. Unless real people trying to research on water filters and wanna ask questions, do post and lets learn together. Pointless to debate between sellers. This post has been edited by zheilwane: Nov 11 2017, 11:49 AM |
|
|
Nov 11 2017, 02:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#360
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,184 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: Builders Hardware Enterprise 0362572412 |
QUOTE(oyching88 @ Nov 11 2017, 12:13 PM) Yet not NSF 53 certified. No way u can argue saying RO water is not cleaner than a Carbon Block + UV light, this is not about AQUAPHOR DWM101 VS ESPRING, this is in general CARBON BLOCK CANNOT WIN RO in terms of water purity. RO can filter Fluoride which normal carbon block cant. U know it well since u r a seller. WHY STILL USE NSF n talk rubbish. U can fool and scare end users but u cant fool users who GOOGLE and read for info. OK la, all also you say, sure got your own reason. No need to condemn other brands or sellers to make your product so superior. Don't tell me NSF 53 more expensive, no demand so no need for that certification Does RO really removes everything? Why Coway didn't get NSF 53? They have 42, 58, 401 and so on. eSpring don't even claim to remove 100% contaminants, yet DWM 101 can simply put 100% http://aquaphor.eu/DWM101S-Reverse-Osmosis...-Mineralisation In my reply i did not say RO filter everything but u DID. RO filters almost everything but not everything, u know it, that is why u mentioned everything not me. With 0.0001 micron RO can even remove minerals, u dare use NSF to say Espring is cleaner? Unless it is not RO, if it is RO no way u can talk it out saying EPSRING IS CLEANER. u can only say EPSRING is healthier water as it contains mineral and not CLEANER. That is the reason i don wanna sell RO even it has NSF. Knowing your stuff and yet trying to deceive people is SO WRONG. |
| Change to: | 0.0227sec
0.31
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 02:08 AM |