
QUOTE
Indonesian Army transporters carrying the Leopard 2 tanks in Lampung on it's way to the combat training centre in Martapura, South Sumatera.
Military Thread V17
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 03:48 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
The Indonesian Army will hold a live-firing exercise on June 15, 2015 in South Sumatera. The Leopard 2 tanks & Marder IFV will take part for the first time in the exercise.
![]() QUOTE Indonesian Army transporters carrying the Leopard 2 tanks in Lampung on it's way to the combat training centre in Martapura, South Sumatera. |
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 04:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jun 11 2015, 03:20 PM) ![]() Nice fact: Vietnam People's Armed Forces currently has 24 Scud launchers with about 100 missiles, almost all of it is aimed at the PRC . And they're are capable of producing the Scud-B missiles by themselves. That's a 100 more missiles Malaysia doesn't have haha |
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 04:08 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
36 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jun 11 2015, 03:20 PM) ![]() Nice fact: Vietnam People's Armed Forces currently has 24 Scud launchers with about 100 missiles, almost all of it is aimed at the PRC . And they're are capable of producing the Scud-B missiles by themselves. That's a 100 more missiles Malaysia doesn't have haha |
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 09:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 09:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
Exercise Predator Walk
![]() ![]() This post has been edited by OvenBaked: Jun 11 2015, 09:18 PM |
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 09:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 09:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
|
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 09:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 10:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
494 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 07:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
|
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 08:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
QUOTE(thpace @ Jun 11 2015, 09:01 PM) Shooting down aircraft is simple compared with shooting down ballistic missiles. Aircrafts are relatively fragile and filled with sensitive materials, a good hit even with a small shrapnel of a HE-Frag warhead at the right place could already bring the whole plane down. But you can't use normal SAM missiles to shoot down even a small ballistic missile like the Scud. Shooting down ballistic missiles is like shooting down a flying telephone pole, peppering it with HE-Frag shrapnel from SAM missiles designed to shoot down aircraft wont do a damn thing to change its trajectory. Worse is once the warhead is already in terminal descent, the speed and gravitational momentum ensures almost nothing can stop it. That's why specialized anti-ballistic missiles (ABM) have a solid tungsten kinetic-energy projectile instead of a HE-Frag warhead common to SAM missiles. But that in itself is a potential weakness, because if the ABM missile projectile so much as misses a ballistic missile warhead by a single inch, it's already a total miss (and believe me, a 5-foot tall nuclear warhead is not that big of a target). With a potential nuclear warhead screaming towards the earth at mach 5+, you don't get a lot of time for a second launch. This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Jun 12 2015, 08:31 AM |
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 08:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jun 12 2015, 08:17 AM) Shooting down aircraft is simple compared with shooting down ballistic missiles. Aircrafts are relatively fragile and filled with sensitive materials, a good hit even with a small shrapnel of a HE-Frag warhead at the right place could already bring the whole plane down. But you can't use normal SAM missiles to shoot down even a small ballistic missile like the Scud. We can talk how how hitting the missile worksShooting down ballistic missiles is like shooting down a flying telephone pole, peppering it with HE-Frag shrapnel from SAM missiles designed to shoot down aircraft wont do a damn thing to change its trajectory. Worse is once the warhead is already in terminal descent, the speed and gravitational momentum ensures almost nothing can stop it. That's why specialized anti-ballistic missiles (ABM) have a solid tungsten kinetic-energy projectile instead of a HE-Frag warhead common to SAM missiles. But that in itself is a potential weakness, because if the ABM missile projectile so much as misses a ballistic missile warhead by a single inch, it's already a total miss (and believe me, a 5-foot tall nuclear warhead is not that big of a target). With a potential nuclear warhead screaming towards the earth at mach 5+, you don't get a lot of time for a second launch. But our lack of medium and long range same just make it pointless. Even our jernas i wonder still works or not. QUOTE(bereev @ Jun 12 2015, 08:22 AM) That not sam lah.Taming sari missile. Dunno what the development now? Project sudah mati kah? |
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 09:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 10:15 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Four ways China can counter US X-47B UCAV: Sina Military ![]() China has four ways to counter the United States Navy's US Navy's X-47B unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV), says the Beijing-based Sina Military Network. Developed by Northrop Grumman, the X-47B is said to provide the US with a major advantage over that offered by traditional fighter jets. The UCAV conducted its maiden flight in 2011 before completing ground tests and commencing test flights in 2013. In-flight refueling tests began at the start of this year. Even when taking mid-air refueling in account, fighter jets only have a range of about 1,500 nautical miles but their combat range is actually much lower as pilot fatigue needs to be factored in, restricting missions to a maximum of around 10 hours. The X-47B, on the other hand, has a range of 3,000 nautical miles, greater than that of the F/A-18 and F-35C fighter jets. UCAVs also don't need to worry about pilot fatigue as operators work in shifts and are easily substituted, meaning mission lengths can be extended to up to 50 hours. By comparison, fighter jets need to return to base, undergo maintenance and change pilots before they can take off again. UCAVs can also carry a wide range of ammunition, including the MK-84, GBU-31, BLU-109, MK-83, MK-82, GBU-32, GBU-103, GBU-104, GBU-105, AGM-114, AGM-65E, CBU-99, GBU-12, MK-82, MK-46/50/54, and so forth, making them extremely versatile and capable of carrying out missions over both sea and land as well as engaging in aerial combat. Importantly, the X-47B would allow US aircraft carriers to maintain a distance of more than 500 nautical miles off the coast of mainland China in an assault on Chinese territory. According to Sina Military, China has three options to counter the X-47B. The first is to deploy the DF-21D ballistic missile to attack the UCAV from distance. The second, though less likely option, is to attack it with the H-6K strategic bomber, though such a strategy could face intercepts from US fighters. The third option is to use attack nuclear submarines to sneak up on US aircraft carriers, though this would require a great deal of intelligence to ensure correct positioning. A fourth alternative is for China to develop sufficient deterrent capabilities to prevent the US from deploying the X-47B in the first place. However, China cannot simply rely on its nuclear threat as a deterrent, the report said, adding that the People's Liberation Army will need to develop more flexible options such as building its own UCAV. http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclas...=20150611000071 |
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 11:40 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
![]() QUOTE Sun, May 24, 2015 Abrams tanks still on defense wish list By Jason Pan / Staff reporter The Ministry of National Defense said it would stick to a plan to buy 120 US-made M1A1 Abrams tanks in an estimated NT$33 billion (US$1.08 billion) deal. The Republic of China (ROC) Army Command Headquarters Office said the program’s budget allocation would be made in 2017, with delivery expected to begin in 2020. The army plans to purchase 120 second-hand M1A1 tanks from the US military to replace Taiwan’s aging M60A3 and CM-11 “Brave Tiger” main battle tanks and bolster infantry divisions’ combat strength. Upon delivery, the 120 tanks are to constitute two battalions for deployment at the main ROC infantry base in Hsinchu County’s Hukou Township (湖口), which is tasked with the defense of the capital, Taipei, and northern Taiwan, army officials said. The original plan was to buy the newer M1A2 tank, which has enhanced electronics and weapons control systems, but it came at a higher price tag, officials said. The ministry elected to go with M1A1s for the estimated expense of NT$33 billion. Officials said this follows the path taken by Australia, which upgraded its infantry with second-hand M1A1 tanks that had been kept in storage. The US performed complete performance tests and systems checks before delivery, it added. The ministry said it has already made public its intention to pursue the plan, with a tender announcement — labeled as project TLP04001 and calling for the procurement of new main battle tanks — placed on the government’s official procurement Web site. However, the tender notice did not include the estimated price, or the total number of tanks by the military. An army official who requested anonymity said the post served to conform with the Government Procurement Act (政府採購法), and referred to the purchase of US M1A1 tanks. Top military officials have expressed concerns that Taiwan’s aging tanks are no match for China’s new Type 99 and other advanced main battle tanks deployed by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, in terms of firepower, defense and other performance indices. The Army Command Headquarters had presented plans in recent years to upgrade its tanks and other armored vehicles, it said. A delay arose because most budget allocations went toward acquiring items with higher priority, including AH-64E Apache and UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/arc...5/24/2003619045 |
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 11:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
Lebanese army conduct live-fire tests on newly arrived US-supplied TOW-II ATGMs
![]() Lebanese military personnel and DSS agents escort US ambassador to Lebanon David Hale as he arrives to the TOW-II ATGM test firing range ![]() A TOW-II ATGM is test-fired from a Lebanese Army M113 Armored Personnel Carrier The Lebanese Army demonstrated their newly received TOW-II missile launchers Wednesday at a military base in the Bekaa Valley in a show of force as it prepares to engage militants on Lebanon’s border. U.S. Ambassador David Hale attended the event and Gen. Maroun Hitti represented the Army’s commander Gen. Jean Kahwagi. “Today we are celebrating just the latest shipment of U.S. equipment, the arrival of over 200 missiles and dozens of launchers for the Lebanese Army,” Hale told reporters as he stood in front of an armored vehicle. “We are absolutely committed to making sure that the Army has the capacity to be the sole defender of Lebanese territory and its borders.” The anti-tank guided missiles are part of weapons and ammunition shipments that have arrived in Beirut in batches this year. “This shipment complements the American aid program specifically for the Lebanese Army, with the goal of strengthening its capacity in facing the dangers targeting Lebanon and in facing the terrorist threat,” military officer Jano al-Hadad said in a speech at the beginning of the demonstration. The shipment – valued at $10 million – arrived in Lebanon via the Rafik Hariri International Airport last week and was partly funded by Saudi Arabia. |
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 12:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
|
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 12:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,283 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: Vietnam |
|
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 12:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
US Congress approves sale of A-29 Super Tucano light attack aircraft to Lebanese Armed Forces
![]() A Brazilian Air Force A-29 Super Tucano light attack aircraft The U.S. Congress approved a $462 million sale of A-29 Super Tucano light attack airplanes and associated equipment, parts and logistical support to Lebanon. The U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) said in a statement on Tuesday that the proposed sale would help the country protect itself from internal and border security threats. According to the agency, the Lebanese government had asked for a possible sale of ten A-29 Super Tucano Aircraft, eight ALE-47 Countermeasure Dispensing Systems, 2,000 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon Systems, two Missile Launch Detection Systems and a non-SAASM Embedded Global Positioning System/Initial Navigation System. Along with this, Lebanon had also requested spare and repair parts, flight testing, maintenance support, support equipment, publications and technical documentation, ferry support, personnel training and training equipment, U.S. Government and contractor engineering and logistics support services. “The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale on Jun 5, 2015,” the statement said, adding: "Implementation of this proposed sale will not require any additional U.S. Government or U.S. contractor personnel in Lebanon. However, periodic travel will be required on a temporary basis for program reviews and technical support." |
|
|
Jun 12 2015, 12:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
Majlis Kimpalan Ulung Littoral Combat Ships
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.1311sec
0.64
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:53 AM |