and more missile frigates plz
Military Thread V17
Military Thread V17
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 04:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
368 posts Joined: Oct 2012 From: Penang |
and more missile frigates plz
|
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:06 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(titarium @ Sep 4 2015, 03:50 PM) France sell is as LHD ; or FRANCE market it as LHD well depend how you look,Mistral is also known as an Assault Ship , quoting from Wiki Capacity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistral-class_amphibious_assault_ship) : - 59 vehicles (including 13 AMX Leclerc tanks) or a 40-strong Leclerc tank battalion - 16 heavy or 35 light helicopters - Support Craft : 4 CTM / 2 LCAC In current context of Malaysia , it would only be use as a recovery mission or transportation from EAST to West which requires such ships . - Recovery mission usually head by UN or Big Country they have funds to do so - Transport can just use Commercial Liner The main function of this Ship of such class : 1) First establish as a HQ/Home Base off shore 2) send in the Heli for recon 3) deploy support craft 4) follow by Landing Craft with Tanks/APC/IFV 5) Air Support from Helicopters 5) take over the shore & beach MY isn't actively engaging this activity , unless wanted to counter terrorist & pirates at their home base ! But back to square 1 , when country is poor don't spend too much on defense , buy what is necessary , the same amount of money rather spend on Patrol Vessel + New Helicopters for Coastal defense especially for Sabah & Straits of MLK to counter piracy (now this is a real threat) . If Malaysia is Rich buying an Aircraft Carrier is not even an issue , currently maintaining the destroyer also faces financial constrain , buying replacement craft for Mig 29 had been postponing for such a long period clearly indicates that the Defense Ministry is tight on budget, moreover any contract that isn't sign 2 years back (or more) had just increase at least 20% in price . Btw MY Navy doubt owning >20 Heli , buying Mistral also means need to buy at least another 10 Helis -> else what's the purpose of buying this LHD ? As of now, I would support more Patrol Vessel + Heli than getting Mistral as a LHD ( but actually is still an assault vessel) . mission can be planning,so many role can be use in Mistral, well we need LHD/LDP to enhance our logistic between sabah/sarawak and UN mission, Helicopter can add step by step no issue. starting just need 2 unit helicopter will be fine. went mission needed, other arm like TUDM/Army/MMEA helicopter can park for Join mission. In piece time no issue to wait Commercial ship, but went contingency happen case like large rescue in sea, flood, or military need send armoured vehicles/ MBT /logistic, which no time wait Commercial Liner, and many to listed .... also last year we already order 6 more Gowind Patrol Vessel with cost usd 3 billion .... average each at 500 million. we no need so much LDP/LDP, compare to warship. one unit cost not much different with warship we buy。we just need 1-2 unit. currently TLDM 2 unit Auxiliary ship already more than 30 year and run max, than due to old serviceability also drop. TLDM already summit proposal for 6 ASW helicopter。 we also no have Destroyer. more importantly the LHD not pay 1 short, it will divided to multiple year re-payment, if really want sell to as. we also keep built new warship from kedah class to Gowind class, but not forgot logistic requirement too. navy required multiple type of ship to run operation. This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 4 2015, 05:28 PM |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:10 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: somewhere in PJ |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,613 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Sg Long/Serdang |
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Sep 4 2015, 04:40 PM) 1. Are you know whats going on in the Sea of SULU and in the Spratly region? Wonder will LHD make possible of launch atk and rescue at sulu sea?2. LOL, apa nama destroyer yang Malaysia ada? 3. If you aware of the situation, the TUDM are in a planned to add more helicopter other then then 1st batch of the Super Cougar, and the PUTD is also are second in line to have their own transport and utility heli. 4. Attack heli and gunship helicopter plan in the future. The LHD/MPSS/MRSS addition to ATM is actually will give more advantage (if you look much more deeper rather then looking to just figure and number) as a show off force and proper power projectile in the dispute region. If the Marine corps establishment come thru in the future this kind of platform is useful. ps: are you Kua Kia Soong? |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:15 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(James831 @ Sep 4 2015, 05:10 PM) Speaking of missile corvettes , what happen to the 6 missile corvettes from korea? Gone case liao???? pending,not get approval in RMK-11.but not sure will get special funding or not. btw, i rather use funding to replace our current 40 year 260 tons 10 unit fac/gun boat to new 500 tons patrol boat. |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:21 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
683 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Sep 4 2015, 04:37 PM) cuz back to square 1, french only offer (albeit they offer it EVERYONE out there, they just wanna let it go asap) but no plans or interest for it from our side, even the menhan said so Yah you are right , anyway Rafizi is doing his job as opposition ringing bell on suspicious matters , Hisham also done his job by clarifying France visit is for Rafale .yes there is a plan from navy to complement its badly needed mpss/mrss ships, but not on the scale of mistral nor the plan even got funded in the first place (go google mini-dokdo and even chinese mrss) stop thinking like we really gonna buy it, there's multiple country out there with stronger financial status who wants it its just imagination runs wild, or more like rafizi runs wild (again).. Side track rumors : due to these deals (be it Rafale or Mistral ) , France authority all the sudden confirms the wing debris at Reunion Island is from MH370 , what a coincident right after raise interest in Rafale. |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,249 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
so i was wondering is ltz a dato yet
|
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 05:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,594 posts Joined: Feb 2006 |
QUOTE(titarium @ Sep 4 2015, 03:50 PM) I don't know what kind of weed you're smoking. We don't have any destroyers at all for one thing. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about if you think we're even seriously considering getting a Mistral. Rafizi is running out of things to talk about so he just jumps on whatever is the current hot rumor. They're going after populist sentiments, that's all. QUOTE(titarium @ Sep 4 2015, 05:27 PM) Yah you are right , anyway Rafizi is doing his job as opposition ringing bell on suspicious matters , Hisham also done his job by clarifying France visit is for Rafale . You're starting to wander into conspiracy theorist territory.Side track rumors : due to these deals (be it Rafale or Mistral ) , France authority all the sudden confirms the wing debris at Reunion Island is from MH370 , what a coincident right after raise interest in Rafale. |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 06:09 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 06:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
683 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Sep 4 2015, 04:40 PM) 1. Are you know whats going on in the Sea of SULU and in the Spratly region? Please dont link someone to any opposition member if they oppose an idea. My stand was base on necessity and current financial situation . 2. LOL, apa nama destroyer yang Malaysia ada? 3. If you aware of the situation, the TUDM are in a planned to add more helicopter other then then 1st batch of the Super Cougar, and the PUTD is also are second in line to have their own transport and utility heli. 4. Attack heli and gunship helicopter plan in the future. The LHD/MPSS/MRSS addition to ATM is actually will give more advantage (if you look much more deeper rather then looking to just figure and number) as a show off force and proper power projectile in the dispute region. If the Marine corps establishment come thru in the future this kind of platform is useful. ps: are you Kua Kia Soong? Bare in mind there's a difference of TUDM & TLDM , Few things need to point out : - Heli to use on LHD have to take on strong wind and have higher shock & vibration requirement while landing on choppy waters or even stormy waters , so TUDM's craft may no be applicable for TLDM (Navy) - Mil don't buy a vessel ( carrier / LHD) then fill up on a later stage due to budget constrain , there must be budget for Helis in place for Mistral - Mistral is TLDM's business so TUDM discuss seperately. The number of Patrol Vessel should be in the >20s figure ,to have a close guard on Malaysia coastal lines. Naming any vessel doesn't prove anything , and referring to destroyer you mean frigates ? (my mistake on this) While raising question on happenings on Sea of Sulu and Spratly Island , in point of modern war fare getting a Mistral especially for Spratly Island is intimidating , as for the pirates getting Mistral means to dock and clean their home base else why you need Vessel which can carry 40-60 APC/MBT/IFV for ? Buying a Mistral now also give reason for SG to purchase an aircraft carrier , they have the money and they have surplus of aircraft (Don't know where to place !! ) , further more with their deal on F-35 (undelivered) means buying an aircraft carrier will just raise the the bar higher. My point is Mistral isn't the priority there are other requirement which need to full fill, before getting such a size of LHD/MPSS/MRSS class of vessel , Fill up the other necessity , TLDM is crying for more advance and complete equipped vessels , more helis to serve their coastal requirement , not a Mistral to show of strength and power to our neighbors especially in time where deficit is hitting hard. This post has been edited by titarium: Sep 4 2015, 06:13 PM |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 06:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
683 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(red streak @ Sep 4 2015, 05:31 PM) I don't know what kind of weed you're smoking. We don't have any destroyers at all for one thing. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about if you think we're even seriously considering getting a Mistral. Rafizi is running out of things to talk about so he just jumps on whatever is the current hot rumor. They're going after populist sentiments, that's all. Sorry my mistake we don't have destroyer . so maintenance for destroyer is "0"You're starting to wander into conspiracy theorist territory. Well just stating rumors not that I believe in it , if I believe I would not have written side track nor rumor. What Rafizi going to talk or stir is a political story , let's just stop right there which is : Rafizi raise alarm on Mistral , True or not Hisham had answer it. BTW I am placing my opinion on Mistral , so there was some other whom agree with the idea : Yet we arn't taking this seriously just an open discussion. This post has been edited by titarium: Sep 4 2015, 06:30 PM |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 06:24 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
Any news of the 2 Samudera Class?
This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 4 2015, 06:45 PM |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 06:24 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
China Building Two Aircraft Carriers, According to Taiwanese Intelligence ![]() China Building Two Aircraft Carriers, According to Taiwanese Intelligence The report on the capabilities of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), a copy of which was obtained by Reuters, says the two new carriers will be the same size as China's only carrier, the Liaoning. China purchased the 60,000-ton Soviet-era vessel from Ukraine in 1998. China has since refitted the Liaoning, which has participated in military drills, including in the disputed South China Sea, but it is not fully operational. Some military experts believe having an operational Liaoning is the first step to deploying Chinese-built carriers by 2020. The report did not give an estimated date for when the new carriers would be completed. But as carriers are commissioned for service into China's navy, a command unit would be set up with "the goal to unify power and accelerate combat capabilities," the report added. Taiwanese intelligence agencies closely monitor Chinese military developments because Beijing has never renounced the use of force to reclaim what it deems a renegade province, Reuters reported. According to the report, of China's 1.24 million-strong ground forces, 400,000 could be used in combat against the island. The Taiwanese Defense Ministry's report adds that Beijing is at least preparing for some kind of conflict with Taipei. The PLA and Chinese special forces have held mock battles, featuring full-scale models of a Taiwanese airport, actual roads, government buildings, and even the president's office, the report said. Ties between the countries have improved under Taiwan's President Ma Ying-jeou. Still, China has threatened to use force to take back Taiwan if the island ever declares its independence. Taiwan has been self-ruled since 1949 when Chiang Kai-shek fled to Taiwan with his Nationalist forces after losing a civil war with Mao Zedong's Communists. http://sputniknews.com/asia/20150904/1026571094.html |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 07:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: somewhere in PJ |
If the french were to offer malaysia russia mistral little brother MISTRAL 140, then we might be seriously consider buying it.
|
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 07:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(bai1101 @ Sep 4 2015, 05:14 PM) launching attack by deploying 2 LCAC full of marine forces and equipment then yes QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 4 2015, 05:26 PM) depend on the SOP,if it just as a SOF near spratly then or nearby support bases then not really as the ship have their own defense even though limited QUOTE(titarium @ Sep 4 2015, 06:12 PM) Please dont link someone to any opposition member if they oppose an idea. My stand was base on necessity and current financial situation . Haha rilek brader, me pulling your leg oni, trust me if you are KKS you are going to have more horrendous remark from me.Bare in mind there's a difference of TUDM & TLDM , Few things need to point out : - Heli to use on LHD have to take on strong wind and have higher shock & vibration requirement while landing on choppy waters or even stormy waters , so TUDM's craft may no be applicable for TLDM (Navy) - Mil don't buy a vessel ( carrier / LHD) then fill up on a later stage due to budget constrain , there must be budget for Helis in place for Mistral - Mistral is TLDM's business so TUDM discuss seperately. The number of Patrol Vessel should be in the >20s figure ,to have a close guard on Malaysia coastal lines. Naming any vessel doesn't prove anything , and referring to destroyer you mean frigates ? (my mistake on this) While raising question on happenings on Sea of Sulu and Spratly Island , in point of modern war fare getting a Mistral especially for Spratly Island is intimidating , as for the pirates getting Mistral means to dock and clean their home base else why you need Vessel which can carry 40-60 APC/MBT/IFV for ? Buying a Mistral now also give reason for SG to purchase an aircraft carrier , they have the money and they have surplus of aircraft (Don't know where to place !! ) , further more with their deal on F-35 (undelivered) means buying an aircraft carrier will just raise the the bar higher. My point is Mistral isn't the priority there are other requirement which need to full fill, before getting such a size of LHD/MPSS/MRSS class of vessel , Fill up the other necessity , TLDM is crying for more advance and complete equipped vessels , more helis to serve their coastal requirement , not a Mistral to show of strength and power to our neighbors especially in time where deficit is hitting hard. OK here is what you missed out. All ATM helis from the A109 PUTD, TUDM Nuri and Cougar are sea capable as one of the requirement of the ATM is the heli must able to conduct sea mission that include landing and docking on ships for very long time. So your first argument is already invalid. On regarding filling up the LHD, yes you are correct that they won’t buy first and fill it up next. Usually this kind of thing is planned out during the procurement especially when it involving the type of the engagement and the role of the LHD in the forces that include the type or size of the LCAC or other amphibious vehicle that the ship shall compliment. But helicopter? That is a whole other chapter, what matter is what inside the ship and not what on top of the ship. As the ship is an amphibious craft first and a heli docks second. The ship with just utility and transport helicopter still can continue to do its job. You don’t need gunship then needed to buy one. “Mistral is TLDM's business so TUDM discuss seperately.” This is where you wrong big time. It is the ATM business and not TLDM alone. Yes TLDM will be the one operating it, but until the the NAVY going to have their marine corps and their own utility and transport air wing they will still have to rely on Tentera Darat for infantry and marine forces and the Air Force respectively. We are not like the US where each branch can work independently. Our forces is small so since the establishment all branches always work together regardless branch. I agree that we need more patrol vessel and the addition and the replacement for the FAC, but if you know more regarding our navy. Since the decommission of the Indrapura, our forces are hit badly in term of logistical support. Only two MPSS that are working nonstop to cover the large waters of Malaysia. Mistral is not a priority, but if the French would offer hard to refuse deals for the ship they why not. BTW do you know that the Frenh deliberately doing this to f**k with the Egypt and Saudi. By doing this they can pump the price more for that 2 suckers as Malaysia do have that special connection with the French. Cheers |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 08:12 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE New tanks have no match in Asia (China Daily) Updated: 2015-09-04 08:46 The PLA ground force's advanced armaments have given the army an offensive capability that is unparalleled in Asia, said military observers. During the Tian'anmen Square parade on Thursday, the PLA ground force displayed its Type-99A main battle tank, the ZBD-04A infantry fighting vehicle and the HJ-10 anti-tank missile. Gao Zhuo, a military observer in Shanghai, said that the Type-99A is a third-generation tank with strong firepower, an advanced active protection system, cutting-edge composite armor and supreme mobility. "What further adds to the tank's combat capability is the adoption of a high-technology data link that gives the tank access to battlefield information obtained by other combat platforms," he said. Liu Qingshan, editor-in-chief of the Tank and Armored Vehicle magazine, said the Type-99A tank has the world's most powerful engine, adding that it also boasts a high level of automation and information capacity. According to a ranking by Germany's Focus magazine, the Type-99A is the third-best tank in the world, only surpassed by Germany's Leopard 2 and the United States' M1A2 Abrams. The report said the Chinese tank features a 125-mm smoothbore gun capable of firing anti-tank guided missiles and a 1,500-horsepower diesel engine. Other unique elements include an active laser self-defense weapon and laser warning receiver, both of which are top countermeasure technologies rarely used in other tanks, Russian media previously reported. Gao said that the ZBD-04A infantry fighting vehicle has a set of lethal weapons-a 100 mm rifled gun, a 30 mm auto-cannon and a 7.62 mm coaxial machine gun-strong enough to destroy any soft or hard target in its way. Compared with its predecessor, the ZBD-04, the new model has improved fire-control equipment and additional armor. It also has an advanced information system capable of being integrated with that of the Type-99A tank, he noted. Read more: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2015vic...nt_21786666.htm |
|
|
Sep 4 2015, 08:30 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(titarium @ Sep 4 2015, 06:12 PM) Please dont link someone to any opposition member if they oppose an idea. My stand was base on necessity and current financial situation . add to atreyuangelBare in mind there's a difference of TUDM & TLDM , Few things need to point out : - Heli to use on LHD have to take on strong wind and have higher shock & vibration requirement while landing on choppy waters or even stormy waters , so TUDM's craft may no be applicable for TLDM (Navy) - Mil don't buy a vessel ( carrier / LHD) then fill up on a later stage due to budget constrain , there must be budget for Helis in place for Mistral - Mistral is TLDM's business so TUDM discuss seperately. The number of Patrol Vessel should be in the >20s figure ,to have a close guard on Malaysia coastal lines. Naming any vessel doesn't prove anything , and referring to destroyer you mean frigates ? (my mistake on this) While raising question on happenings on Sea of Sulu and Spratly Island , in point of modern war fare getting a Mistral especially for Spratly Island is intimidating , as for the pirates getting Mistral means to dock and clean their home base else why you need Vessel which can carry 40-60 APC/MBT/IFV for ? Buying a Mistral now also give reason for SG to purchase an aircraft carrier , they have the money and they have surplus of aircraft (Don't know where to place !! ) , further more with their deal on F-35 (undelivered) means buying an aircraft carrier will just raise the the bar higher. My point is Mistral isn't the priority there are other requirement which need to full fill, before getting such a size of LHD/MPSS/MRSS class of vessel , Fill up the other necessity , TLDM is crying for more advance and complete equipped vessels , more helis to serve their coastal requirement , not a Mistral to show of strength and power to our neighbors especially in time where deficit is hitting hard. Mistral as LHD so platfrom capability to join operation from different unit like TUDM, TDM, MMEA even other country defense helicopter during join operation this reason we wan to get LHD/LPD or MRSS. it improve alot country ATM capability. our TUDM EC725 already land in Mistral during Join France-Malaysia exercise in 2015 ![]() ![]() our TUDM EC725 also come with folder blade usually only see in Navy helicopter ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 4 2015, 11:30 PM |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0296sec
0.10
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 01:01 AM |