QUOTE(Dyong @ May 16 2008, 12:17 PM)
The report is just an elaborated Advertisement for their exorbidant school fees.
Outlyers is prevalent in every statistical analysis, but conveniently misrepresented to appeal to mass public in this case.
"Coincidentally", the Director of SMU holds a Likewise position in Singapore Press Holdings...
There're are more Rag to Riches stories, mate.
Fact is, Education does not guarantee success, likewise, Harvard or SMU.
There is some truth in what you said, but not all untrue as I have colleagues's children from SMU earning that kind of pay anmd securing employment way before graduation... so not totally untrue. Any way, correction to your statement of Directotr of SMU holds position in SPH.. its the other way round most time in SG... most people in high places will be asked to hold mulitple appointment in any related kind of insititution and establishment if you not already known. We in SG are immune to such news, nothing is new and many times published in the press... Its something so common and even foreign press has asked why... and the strain on manpower distribution. This so called multiple appointment often do not carry any monetary reward like pay espceially in related Gov sector. SMU being considered as the 3rd U should falls under such category.. However, there might be exception I don't know... this kind of thing has never been reveal to public except under circumstances... privacy... kind of stuff to me, who wants to have their prviate stuff being made known?
true, education doesn't garranty anything, but in SG case, having a higher education offers better pay job.. .that's a fact of life here and even if I don't like it.... so what... I remember saying this to my vendors in US and Germany and they too agree.... unfortunately, they told me its going to happen not just in SG, even in their own country too, that was some 13-14 yrs ago.... just that the pace is that fast in SG for such thing to happen. However, there are still jobs that requires skills and wits, not just education. Even the Gov knows this.. so ? just to quote you an example, the recent change in Taxi regulation that caused lots of corncen for commuters without consulting the ground, people taking taxi was a good example. Taxi operators were told of the changes, but not sure whether they raised any concern. Even if they did, so? See what happen 1 month after implementation? Lots of critiscism not only from locals, even foreigners are taken by the rules... so much so that they tweaked the rule by introducing another rule... The Land Transport Authroity (LTA) said their had planned this long ago, but fall short of implementing till recently... but then to us men in the street... just a case of too many scholarly comfortible people sitting in their office and driving to work more than taking transport to see the problem ordinary citizen faced, bad publicity was every where. After the whole feista, they came out to explan their position and rational behind the change... so? DEAL BIG? the intention was good to me though, but the implementation was SUCKS... as many Singaporeans felt..
Added on May 17, 2008, 10:59 amQUOTE(chess_gal @ May 17 2008, 12:28 AM)
Singapore is very transparent in its governance, priviledge no doubt always goes to the locals, just common sense, your father as the government and yourself as the local, your dad will surely give in to your demand rather than your neighbour's child right? So, same concept here, but one thing different from Msia is that, the Singapore Father is FAIR to all children. If you get what i mean.
I was told recently by my colleague from a BIG establishment who is employing managers to be stationed at somewhere. Sorry, can't revel detail here, and the place they are working at is air-con, to me, its considered good enviorment and you see many people every daily, but fall short of requirement because it comes with a shift work...., even giving priority to locals for job employment is a problem as some jobs fall short of local expectation. Locals may shun certain jobs... If the compnay can't find suitible locals to fill, they will resort to getting foriegn talent to do the jobs. Of course, they will have to satisfied the Gov request 1st (if gov related company, but subjective to .... but not true all time because I come from one such establishment) till no suitible candidate is found, then they will get foriegners... So don't be dis-heartened with that kind of advertisment. Even I as a Singaporenas feel disgusted at some of the locals attitude..
Added on May 17, 2008, 11:07 amQUOTE(Dyong @ May 17 2008, 12:36 AM)
So serving 2.5 years in National Service is a privilege?
Singapore worships capitalism.
Capitalism goes for efficiency, not protectionism.
Again, PR is not equal to Citizen.
FYI, for years, PR and foriegners were treated far better than citizens... because I too hate it not because of these people, but because of our Gov policies that gives all equal rights and even more but fall short on citizens with demands attached like NS thingy which to many of us, a sour point and stinking torn to the Gov... no added beneifts of being one.. that was one key reason why many Singaporeans left in those years of nation building. SG Gov of recently years started changing those rules bit by bit.. .not wanting to frighten of foriegn talent...
In anyway, now PR has to pay higher medical fees (unless compnay employees) as the subsidy is lower... Mind you, they will still be some subsidy but lower.... however, I can't name many of such things as I am not much into such depth even if I did read about it.. .won't bother to remember. only things that comes about now is all the rebates that the Gov is giving out to its citizens for GST, ecomony and inflation to cushion the cost of living in short term especially to the elderly folks... but not PR.. over the past several years.
Added on May 17, 2008, 11:31 amQUOTE(myusername @ May 17 2008, 08:36 AM)
Btw, the Singaporean government and private sector
does not owe you a living.
Malaysia
does not protect
all its citizens

Agree with you, to me, its answerable for its action to its citizens.. We should be the one strifing for ourself.... Old mindset has change and gone, new mindset... is still struggling to stay on top as SG has nothing at all... even in today's Straits Times, as reported, is SG losing it edge? when other countries over take us and wheninvestors not coming.. SG Gov suffers? Yes economy suffers = citizens take the hit directly due to no or less jobs. where to find food? SG Gov? not sure what they will do, but immediate effect on us. We certainly can't be like MY, plant something at your own backyard and can survive will do, where to find land?. So we have to fight for ourselves...and when everyone does that, Gov has less problem in tackling citizens rice bowl issue can in terms, focus more in searching for opportunities..
Sorry, I don't want to sounds more like a leggy for my Gov, but that's how I see... having seem what my parents gone through. Yes, SG Gov not perfect and I am not all in favour in some of the policies, although I must say, some that doesn't even benefits me at all but I will support because it benifited the poorer folks ...
This post has been edited by bbmars: May 17 2008, 11:31 AM