Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The SSD Thread V5, Solid State Drive

views
     
NightFelix
post Mar 8 2015, 09:30 AM

Samsung Exynos
********
All Stars
17,467 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Lazada



QUOTE(skylinelover @ Mar 8 2015, 06:46 AM)
840 pro owner reporting in laugh.gif i buy right at the EOL stage too along with i7 rclxms.gif total damage 2.9k sweat.gif  rclxub.gif
*
Cheaper than 850 pro how much?
horns
post Mar 8 2015, 10:02 AM

\m/
*******
Senior Member
3,038 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(skylinelover @ Mar 8 2015, 06:46 AM)
840 pro owner reporting in laugh.gif i buy right at the EOL stage too along with i7 rclxms.gif total damage 2.9k sweat.gif  rclxub.gif
*
haha nice biggrin.gif doing upgrades to your rig eh?
skylinelover
post Mar 8 2015, 11:18 AM

Future Crypto Player😄👊Driver Abamsado😎😎
********
All Stars
11,244 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(NightFelix @ Mar 8 2015, 09:30 AM)
Cheaper than 850 pro how much?
*
50 plus i think

QUOTE(horns @ Mar 8 2015, 10:02 AM)
haha nice biggrin.gif doing upgrades to your rig eh?
*
heck yeah

i7 4790k
msi z97 gaming 7
2 pieces 4 gig ram
ssd 250gb

brows.gif
horns
post Mar 9 2015, 12:09 AM

\m/
*******
Senior Member
3,038 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(skylinelover @ Mar 8 2015, 11:18 AM)
heck yeah

i7 4790k
msi z97 gaming 7
2 pieces 4 gig ram
ssd 250gb

brows.gif
*
sweet man biggrin.gif

if you have extras i suggest you add more ram (like 32gb) and use ram disk and cache. personally, for my use cases i 'feel' better system responsiveness compared to bare ssd-only.
stromae
post Mar 9 2015, 12:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
247 posts

Joined: Sep 2014
guys kingston v300 120gb ok or not?


horns
post Mar 9 2015, 09:23 AM

\m/
*******
Senior Member
3,038 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(stromae @ Mar 9 2015, 12:20 AM)
guys kingston v300 120gb ok or not?
*
no it's not ok. if you haven't done research even on this single option, i really suggest you do so. although it might be fine for people who are getting their first ssd because of the massive performance improvements over hdd, i still think it's wiser to get others than v300 for your money.

in short, when there are a lot of options using sync nand flash, skip async nand. even though the drive performance is subject to mainly controller, imo there is no need to challenge physical differences between these two types of nand, and still go for the much slower option. (unless you are really having no choice)

you can consider liteon s900, transcend ssd370, or toshiba q series pro at 120gb range. as of now, know that the actual sweet spot is 240gb range.
icecreamcake
post Mar 9 2015, 09:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
307 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
hi guys,

crucial m500 240gb vs liteon s900 240gb

which better in terms of reliability and performance ?

both are same price.
dun_panic
post Mar 9 2015, 09:32 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Kay Bee~Kay Eyy


guys ur old SSD still ok? mine already >2 years
horns
post Mar 9 2015, 09:32 AM

\m/
*******
Senior Member
3,038 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(icecreamcake @ Mar 9 2015, 09:28 AM)
hi guys,

crucial m500 240gb vs liteon s900 240gb

which better in terms of reliability and performance ?

both are same price.
*
they are the same imo. my preference is liteon s900 because it's newer.
horns
post Mar 9 2015, 09:34 AM

\m/
*******
Senior Member
3,038 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(dun_panic @ Mar 9 2015, 09:32 AM)
guys ur old SSD still ok? mine already >2 years
*
yes, for my drives that are more than 2 years old, they are still 100% good health lol!
dun_panic
post Mar 9 2015, 09:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Kay Bee~Kay Eyy


QUOTE(horns @ Mar 9 2015, 09:34 AM)
yes, for my drives that are more than 2 years old, they are still 100% good health lol!
*
100?? lol really, my <1year imac already 9+ haha
horns
post Mar 9 2015, 09:54 AM

\m/
*******
Senior Member
3,038 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(dun_panic @ Mar 9 2015, 09:40 AM)
100?? lol really, my <1year imac already 9+ haha
*
yeah. my ocz vertex 4 (256gb), plextor m5pro xtreme (512gb), and plextor m5m (256gb) are all 2 years+ old.

it depends on usage actually. i think if you apply the common ssd optimizations, tips and tricks found on the first page of this thread, it's very likely your ssd can survive for quite some times.

furthermore, i download my stuff into hdd. i also use ram cache and ram disk.


limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 01:42 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
Good afternoon, i just installed a lite-on ssd to my system but i am not feeling any great speed boost at all. Is it normal?
SUSngkhanmein
post Mar 9 2015, 01:43 PM

カラカラ Karakara
*******
Senior Member
7,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor.


QUOTE(limadekad @ Mar 9 2015, 01:42 PM)
Good afternoon, i just installed a lite-on ssd to my system but i am not feeling any great speed boost at all. Is it normal?
*
boot OS need more than 10sec? transferring files slow?
SUSngkhanmein
post Mar 9 2015, 01:44 PM

カラカラ Karakara
*******
Senior Member
7,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor.


QUOTE(horns @ Mar 9 2015, 09:54 AM)
yeah. my ocz vertex 4 (256gb), plextor m5pro xtreme (512gb), and plextor m5m (256gb) are all 2 years+ old.

it depends on usage actually. i think if you apply the common ssd optimizations, tips and tricks found on the first page of this thread, it's very likely your ssd can survive for quite some times.

furthermore, i download my stuff into hdd. i also use ram cache and ram disk.
*
wah ur OCZ still alive? shakehead.gif
TristanX
post Mar 9 2015, 01:49 PM

Where is my stars?
Group Icon
Elite
24,334 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(limadekad @ Mar 9 2015, 01:42 PM)
Good afternoon, i just installed a lite-on ssd to my system but i am not feeling any great speed boost at all. Is it normal?
*
Is your previous drive a SSD? You won't feel the difference switching brands.
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 02:00 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Mar 9 2015, 01:43 PM)
boot OS need more than 10sec? transferring files slow?
*
iinm the boot time is longer than 10 sec. Haven't tried file transfer yet.

QUOTE(TristanX @ Mar 9 2015, 01:49 PM)
Is your previous drive a SSD? You won't feel the difference switching brands.
*
Nope, was using a WD Green previously.

Is it just me? I've upgraded my ram to 8 gb as well.
SUSngkhanmein
post Mar 9 2015, 02:01 PM

カラカラ Karakara
*******
Senior Member
7,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor.


QUOTE(limadekad @ Mar 9 2015, 02:00 PM)
iinm the boot time is longer than 10 sec. Haven't tried file transfer yet.
Nope, was using a WD Green previously.

Is it just me? I've upgraded my ram to 8 gb as well.
*
impossible. i'm using 128gb plextor m6s
NightFelix
post Mar 9 2015, 02:06 PM

Samsung Exynos
********
All Stars
17,467 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Lazada



QUOTE(limadekad @ Mar 9 2015, 01:42 PM)
Good afternoon, i just installed a lite-on ssd to my system but i am not feeling any great speed boost at all. Is it normal?
*
List your PC spec and see. hmm.gif OS Win7 or Win8.1?
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 02:13 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Mar 9 2015, 02:01 PM)
impossible. i'm using 128gb plextor m6s
*
QUOTE(NightFelix @ Mar 9 2015, 02:06 PM)
List your PC spec and see. hmm.gif OS Win7 or Win8.1?
*
Intel G2020
Asrock H71M-DGS
Team Elite 4gb 1600 x2
Lite-on 256 SSD
Asus Nvidia GeForce 650Ti Boost 2gb
Win 8.1 Pro 64 bit

This post has been edited by limadekad: Mar 10 2015, 05:26 PM

126 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0196sec    0.88    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:06 PM