Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The SSD Thread V5, Solid State Drive

views
     
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 01:42 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
Good afternoon, i just installed a lite-on ssd to my system but i am not feeling any great speed boost at all. Is it normal?
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 02:00 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Mar 9 2015, 01:43 PM)
boot OS need more than 10sec? transferring files slow?
*
iinm the boot time is longer than 10 sec. Haven't tried file transfer yet.

QUOTE(TristanX @ Mar 9 2015, 01:49 PM)
Is your previous drive a SSD? You won't feel the difference switching brands.
*
Nope, was using a WD Green previously.

Is it just me? I've upgraded my ram to 8 gb as well.
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 02:13 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Mar 9 2015, 02:01 PM)
impossible. i'm using 128gb plextor m6s
*
QUOTE(NightFelix @ Mar 9 2015, 02:06 PM)
List your PC spec and see. hmm.gif OS Win7 or Win8.1?
*
Intel G2020
Asrock H71M-DGS
Team Elite 4gb 1600 x2
Lite-on 256 SSD
Asus Nvidia GeForce 650Ti Boost 2gb
Win 8.1 Pro 64 bit

This post has been edited by limadekad: Mar 10 2015, 05:26 PM
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 05:05 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(horns @ Mar 9 2015, 03:24 PM)
uh? with w8.1 it should be even faster. the first thing to check is to run crystal diskmark and see if it runs at advertised speed. if it's lower, check if you're connected to intel sata3 port. have you updated the firmware?
*
firmware? mobo firmware is the latest.
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 05:06 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(TristanX @ Mar 9 2015, 03:33 PM)
The more drive you install, the longer it boots due to drive detection. You might wanna optimize some settings. It should be significantly faster than WD Green.
*
any pointers?

QUOTE(arifhasim85 @ Mar 9 2015, 03:51 PM)
becnhmark your ssd using crystaldiskmark and post the result here..
*
at work right now, will do later
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 09:19 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
user posted image

this one issit?
limadekad
post Mar 9 2015, 09:53 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(horns @ Mar 9 2015, 09:46 PM)
yes. just checked your mobo manual (i took a look at h71m-dgs; couldn't find h71-dgs at asrock website), the mobo has only sata2 ports. there is no sata3 ports.

from your diskmark test, your ssd is actually running at full sata2 speed. that's nothing wrong with it.
*
sorry it's h71m-dgs, my bad. so the speed i'm experiencing is perfectly normal? kinda disappointing though
limadekad
post Mar 10 2015, 11:11 AM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(horns @ Mar 9 2015, 11:05 PM)
yes that's normal. it's the sata2 bottleneck that hinders the performance of your ssd.

don't get the wrong idea that when you have a ssd then you must be able to cold-boot it faster than a hdd, especially when you are running w8.x. (like TristanX pointed out, there are things that need time to load during boot time. the more hardware you put in, the long time it takes) the more important part imo is always when you use a computer, e.g. loading apps/games, and working on stuff. it should be more responsive than before with a ssd. sorry but i don't get the part that you are disappointing to have a ssd in your system.
maybe you guys should share some pointers to limadekad on how you make it run fast smile.gif
*
well, i was hoping for a noticable speed bump when i upgraded my system with an ssd and additional ram.
what option do i have? upgrade my mobo?
limadekad
post Mar 10 2015, 05:31 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Mar 10 2015, 12:34 PM)
check whether ur plug cable connected to sata 3 6gb/s & check ur bios setting. make sure is ACHI & SSD

enable TRIM
*
as mentioned by horns, my mobo only support sata 2. trim is enabled
limadekad
post Mar 11 2015, 04:05 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(arifhasim85 @ Mar 10 2015, 11:31 AM)
well tbh, the sata 2 port really holding you back.. your ssd should give double the speed especially the read speed of your current setup.. even a good hdd can give 150 - 190mb/s of read speed.. by just upgraded to 270mb/s of read speed, the speed gain is insignificant. since you already have a ssd, why not just get a mobo that can support sata 3 to fully utilize the ssd performance..  thumbup.gif
*
QUOTE(NightFelix @ Mar 10 2015, 12:30 PM)
Change mobo to support Sata3.

Mine is Win7 64Bits Ultimate. SSD Plextor 128GB M5Pro. You see me used up 72% still capable to boot my OS in less than 10seconds.
*
what mobo would you recommend? m-atx form factor if possible, and cheap.

QUOTE(cherroy @ Mar 11 2015, 02:25 PM)
I used SSD in a Sata 2 mobo to replace HDD (blue), the performance indeed show significant performance.
Loading window faster, opening program instantly instead waiting it loading, despite being bottled neck by Sata 2.
(even run in ide mode as the mobo showed significant lagging in detecting ACHI drive, don't know why, as well problem in detecting Cd-rom, so installed in IDE mode to give it a try).
Replacing HDD with SSD is one of most significant improvement that user can feel on the upgrade.
*
i dunno, i just don't feel the speed bump, maybe because i used to tweak the start-up for faster boot time. back in the old days when i upgraded my ram from 512mb to 2gb, the speed increase felt significant.
limadekad
post Mar 17 2015, 06:23 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
user posted image

The ssd is not even a month. sad.gif
How to fix this?
limadekad
post Mar 17 2015, 07:27 PM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(ashraf095 @ Mar 17 2015, 07:15 PM)
Try other benchmark 1st.
*
which one? suggestion?
limadekad
post Oct 15 2016, 09:23 AM

:)
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(btfan @ Oct 12 2016, 12:06 PM)
My lite-on S900 256GB stopped working without warning after about 1.5 years also whereas my older Plextor M5 is still working fine. Strange since both should be using the same marvell controller and toshiba nand.

Thinking about getting the Transcend 370 as replacement.
*
same case here, all files wasted. my old intel ssd is going strong.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0668sec    0.30    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 04:04 AM