The SSD Thread V5, Solid State Drive
|
|
 Mar 9 2015, 01:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur  
|
QUOTE(limadekad @ Mar 9 2015, 01:42 PM) Good afternoon, i just installed a lite-on ssd to my system but i am not feeling any great speed boost at all. Is it normal? Is your previous drive a SSD? You won't feel the difference switching brands. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2015, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(limadekad @ Mar 9 2015, 02:00 PM) iinm the boot time is longer than 10 sec. Haven't tried file transfer yet. The more drive you install, the longer it boots due to drive detection. You might wanna optimize some settings. It should be significantly faster than WD Green.Nope, was using a WD Green previously. Is it just me? I've upgraded my ram to 8 gb as well. |
|
|
Mar 11 2015, 05:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(stromae @ Mar 11 2015, 05:07 PM) hi guys which is better... Yeah, you can use the best SSD in the world and still bottleneck. Just get the cheapest. Unless you have upgrade plan for CPU and motherboard soon.my maximum budget is rm300.. LITE-ON 900S 128GB (M5PRO) 92K/82K 540/330 RM240 KINGSTON HYPER X 120G 20K/60K 555/510 RM275 TRANSCEND 370 128GB 75K/75K 570/470 RM219 PLEXTOR M6S 128GB 88K/75K 520/300 RM289 btw in my mind is transcend 370... btw my pc will bottleneck.. since still using SATA 3Gbps port.. thx.. |
|
|
Apr 12 2015, 01:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
24,334 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(nemesis94 @ Apr 12 2015, 12:50 AM) I see. So what are the circumstances that will make the Samsung perform better than the Lite-on? Like synthetic benchmarks. You won't feel the difference on real world. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0535sec
 0.72
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 11:32 PM |
Quote