QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Aug 17 2015, 12:45 AM)
http://samcheekong.blogspot.com/<< With 40% of our debt is short term in nature, thus it can be said that there are about RM 300 billion in short term debt that are vulnerable to reverse flow. The question is, say if only 50% (RM 150 billion) of the short term funds decided to rush for the exit can Bank Negara counter this move? What chance are we able to defend the Ringgit with just USD 96.7 billion left in the Foreign Exchange Reserves? Please do not forget that from the table above, our Short Term Debt/ FX Reserve stands at 80% which is the second highest after Turkey. Turkey is the biggest Emerging Market economy to succumb to the current financial crisis. >>
<< The third point to note from the table above is that foreign holding of Malaysian bonds stands at 44%. This is the third largest after Hungary and Mexico. Malaysia also has one of the largest LCY (Local Currency) bonds in Asia after Japan and Korea. It is close to 100% to GDP or about RM 1 trillion. Below is the breakdown.>>
<< Who are on the losing side when they invest in local currency bonds especially when the Ringgit is depreciating? Well foreign bond holders will be on the losing side. This is because when they exit the bond market they will be getting less USD when they convert their Ringgit to the USD.
To ensure the bondholders do not exit at the same time, interest rates will have to rise as a form of compensation. The price of bonds is inversely related to the yield. When happens when foreign investors start selling? The price of bond will go down and the yield will go up. The nightmare every country has is a ‘bond run’. This happens when every bond holder starts rushing for the exit and this will cause a selloff in the bond market which in turn caused interest rates to rise substantially.>>
<< Wrapping Up
In wrapping up, from above we know that Malaysia is now one of the most vulnerable countries subjected to capital outflows. This is mainly due to our large exposure to short term debts. With Short Term Debt/ FX Reserve at 80% and Short Term Debt/ Total Debt at 40% and dwindling foreign reserves. In short, we are running on wafer thin safety margin. With Turkey, Russia and Brazil already admitted to defeat in the Currency war, Malaysia’s effort to prop up the Ringgit by selling the Dollar will end up a loser game. Brazil has since gone to the next level of protectionism by enlisting embargo and tariffs. If our political crisis is not solved within a shortest period of time, our economy, exchange rate and stock market will risk a rapid decline soon.
In tradespeak, this amounts to terminal velocity.>>
Folks,
Some highlight from this blog.
Dreamer
A few points missed out,
1. BNM never want to prop up RM. Recent intervention was just to reduce the drastic move or too much volatility, to prevent unnecessary fear and chaotic.
BNM never want to fix RM at whatever level, which has just been stated by Zeti during recent press conference.
2. Short term debt, mean debt matured soon, it doesn't mean those debt cannot be refinanced, especially if it is RM denominated. Liquidity still ample.
Also those short term debt may not all constituted by gov debt.
It could be corporate, banking borrowing, which normally can be refinanced easily, and not necessary those money must be outflowing.
3. Increase interest rate won't help to counter the outflow, if foreign investors already decided to flee.
A 25 basis or even 50 basis points won't make too much a difference. Capital flee away and back to USD is everywhere, the aftermath remedy of QE ended.
Emerging market has been "enjoying" the QE by Fed since 2010 to 2014, now pay back time.
So current situation is not about interest rate.
The bolded statement is wrong also.
In fact, existing bond holder hurt more by the rate hike and could accelerate the bond flee.
As when interest rate is rising, bond become less attractive.
The currency war between emerging market that many talked about is regarding who depreciate the most for emerging market, everyone want their currency to be lower, not higher.
So their "depreciating" currency is not a "defeat".