Dont live in your own imagination world la......

lots of your "large" claims are rubbish la...... i wont say totally no such cases as u mention.... but it is definitely no way as u claim the "large" number...... start your trolling again already ya........

just small little info, Ariffin Zakaria not layman , got degrees from University of Sheffield & University College London.. and our ketua hakim negara also the federal courts hakim

This post has been edited by bearbearwong: Jan 6 2015, 10:58 PM

I have no problem because that is my responsibility and I not expecting owner give me unforseen waranty

In fact I will ask whther my purchase price can cover owner loan anot because that is the major problem for deal stuck in middle but usually this will not happen.

I am a type of person who hate troublesome. Even as seller I will insist buyer check for loan clause as I don't wan buyer drag me for long time if cannot get loan. I would ask my agent put 14 working days clause for buyer to check for loan , n I will return deposit if he can't secure loan. I will put this just don't want the agent suck buyer hard earn money in case he not qualify for loan, further delay need agreement from me. After he confirm loan , there will no bargain from me - I think fair enought

Check everything before find lawyer or get a lawyer advise before sign offer letter..be a fussy owner better than a fake gentlement. In my role as a owner, I will advise for a young buyer ( if he really no experience n I will not take advantage ) and I will give them enought time for survey,advise n preparation but at same time I will never risk myself

If my property for sale and if there are any , once buyer put in deposit I will stop someone to view in 14s working day and if he cannot come back with me I have option to resell to others..I think that is fair enought

Aiyoo...bearbear why you argue with all the lao jiao here ?

When read your comment, already know you got no experience in SPA.

What Jliew said is practised by those experienced investor. They know where to save money and don't pay unnecessary cost. While essential cost like good agents, they not stingy one...Agent can find them very good kangtao in the future while lawyer....ahem ahem....

kisiao again already ah.........

KNN..... where do u find flippers??..... flipper are mainly from newly VPed project la...... Newly completed project defects are handed by developer mah..... and the buyer got eyes to see also if the unit is new or not mah.....

Responsibilities are both sides la......

I bought a sub sale...... unit is consider vacant ever since VP (fyi..... almost 7yr vacant ) ..... owner use it as a simple storage place...... his selling terms is "as it is" too..... as he dont even visited the place before so he do not kno if there is any defects....... so as buyer, it is my own responsibilities to check the place and accept the "as it is condition" or not la.......

This post has been edited by AppreciativeMan: Jan 6 2015, 11:14 PM

bearbear,

This thread less than 5 hours already 5 pages. Your thread so many days only 5 pages

Sau Pei Lah !

This post has been edited by Showtime747: Jan 6 2015, 11:13 PM

ok guys ,

Dalam Perkara Low Yat Net (serious kopitiam section)
Dalam kes tuntutan sivil Innocent buyer vs Jliew
Kes 2015-Midfields 2
corum : BBW
(versi bahasa malaysia)

Setelah mendengar hujah-hujah dan keterangan -keterangan para saksi-saksi hari ini, BBW pendapat bahawa Defendan telah bertindak secara tidak jujur atau "bona fide" dalam transaksi jual beli rumah Mdifields 2 kerana kerosakan -kerosakan yang sedia ada telah dibuktikan dengan beban bukti dalam imbangan kebarangkalian mudah yang mana kerosakkan tersebut telah diketahui oleh Defendan ketika Defendan menjualnya, Dfenden juga telah menggunakan undang-undang sedia ada/perjanjian sebagai "sword rather than sheild" yang sama sekali bercanggah dengan prinsip undang-undang, maka BBW memerintahkan seperti berikut:

a) Perjanjian jual beli dibatalkan dengan "recission efftct"
b) Deposit 10% dipulangkan kepada Plaintif dalam masa 1 bulan dari perintah ini
c) segala kos perjanjia jual beli ditanggung sesama sendiri
d) kos sebanyak 10,000.00 kepada Plaintif
e) suatu registrar kaveat didaftarkan pada hartanah tersebut
f) kos kepada BBW 20,000
e) lain -lain relif

bertarik 6/1/2015

-sign-

This post has been edited by bearbearwong: Jan 6 2015, 11:21 PM

bearbear ki siao already

just chui sui only and exhange talks...

hope you walk the talk thou, if you happen to see a buyer ask many tings maybe me ok...

bearbear all talk theory only. Wait until you have real practical case then only you understand what is going on...

this is how i talk in work leh...lol

Bearbear , Mari jliew ajar BBW sesuatu,

Pertama jika perjanjian dibatalkan macam mana hartanah tersebut dikavietkan

Kedua, midifeld 2 masih dalam master title, tidak mungkin pemaju hartanah izimkan BBW caviet seluruh projek midfield



Teach u something new today ...not believe ask your gf to confirm

dont troll la......

u just a trainee...... talk what law or transaction procedure........

pertama dikaveatkan untuk diwartakan sebagai harta kerajaan atau menjual dengan harga 500k atau di abwah nya

Hahaha i prefer buyer ask everything before commit...better clear any doubt as I prefer no argument in later stage.

by the way I assume today talk that have a bit essence than just trolling

lol, you know why caveat was entered? you pay RPGT yourself, but agent forgot to pay, so no pay government, that y caveat

This post has been edited by bearbearwong: Jan 6 2015, 11:30 PM

lu papa peguam? jual beli rumah perjanjian begitu susah ke?

apa caveat tu? tak faham la

Then u know why I submit myself ?

By the way master title u can't caviet , developer won't allow u caviet whole building except for those have title already


And if I pay to agent that usually mean lawyer and if lawyer forgoten then he is in professional negligence

Sorry I mean private caviet , goverment caviet I dono

This post has been edited by Jliew168: Jan 6 2015, 11:35 PM