QUOTE(unknown warrior @ Nov 1 2014, 12:56 PM)
All the priorities are very important and that would include praying in tongues to God. Spiritual warfare is not something we should take lightly.
I need to be clear that, This is not the same as speaking in tongues of other languages or to instruct another believer in tongues. No. now THAT gifting is as what you've said, it is distributed accordingly.
But not this one;
This is praying in tongues to God directly in the context of ver 2. Every Christian have this gifting, that is why Paul said I would like every one of you to speak in tongues because everyone can. But he goes on to say I rather that you prophesy because prophecy it's for building of the Church as a whole. You noticed that he made a clear contrast that speaking in tongues is private. (Only you and God). Neither did the Bible indicated that Tongues is a sign for believers. But if someone pray in tongues loudly for the entire Church, then you need an interpreter. Because on sunday service, there could be unbelievers attending.
Problem is, some Christian misquote this and apply it to all situation, even in mission fields using the same reason meant for unbelievers.
In prayer group for mission, I believe it is reasonable to say all present are believers. You cannot use that and say praying/speaking in tongues is not important.
That is my context of the point I made.
Your concern is shown when you asked is praying /speaking in tongues necessary/important? and you go and quote 1 Corinthians 12, 13 & 14.
Most Christians who don't understand the context of 1 Corinthians 14 will inevitably question it is important Because I don't understand what the guy is praying.
Am I right to say this is your concern?
You're nearly there! But it's not *just* about unbelievers, but ALSO it's about LOVE to OTHER believers! You get it now? The motivation here is love! When you gather as Christians, you do so to build one another up!
So EVEN in the context of christians, I don't see how praying in tongues should be done when we are gathered. You see why now? Paul is telling the corinthians to love one another (cf. 1 Cor 13) because it's the most excellent way!
Here are two helpful quotes from the commentary I linked up earlier:
QUOTE
Third, the gift of tongues is not some form of direct communication with God, as was undoubtedly thought of by the Corinthians and is often thought of today as well. People today often appeal to 14:2 in support of such a contention. This reading of the passage is fallacious for it is not Paul's point in v. 2 to affirm that the speaker has some mystical direct communion with God. His point is that since the tongues speaker (i.e., without an interpreter) speaks words that no one else can understand, he ends up speaking only to God, that is, only God can understand. To everyone else he speaks mysteries.55 Support for this idea cannot be garnered from 14:4 or 14:14-15 either. In each of these cases, uninterpreted tongues is the issue and only the speaker is edified. He may be encouraged well enough, as is anyone who exercises their gift. He may even be more so since his gift tends toward the spectacular (i.e., the ability to speak a foreign language without having studied it). But, his immaturity has lured him toward a fascination for the miraculous at the expense of the needs of his own brethern. This is carnality, not genuine spirituality (3:1ff).
And directly addressing your argument from verse 5:
QUOTE
Fifth, there were those in Corinth who claimed as many do today that all men should speak in tongues. Appeal is made to 14:5. There Paul says that he wished that all of them spoke in tongues. But, how can he be taken literally, when he has just finished arguing at length in chapter 12 against the Corinthian reductionism that everyone must speak in tongues. No, he boldly proclaimed that the Spirit had given varieties of gifts and that not all had the gift of tongues. If all did have the gift, how could someone fill the spot of the ungifted (i.e., without the gift of tongues), as according to his argument, they did (cf. 14:16)? What then is the need for an interpreter in the assembly? The reason Paul says this is that if all speak in tongues he could be guaranteed, because of their selfish state, that everyone would get edified, the very thing for which he is arguing. In the end though, uniformity is not the design of the Spirit (12:11).
Notice how both arguments are made with appeal to the context; context, context, context. We must never forget the context!
Also, I was discussing 1 cor 14 with General Fahmy and alluded with my mission team leader for another scenario (in terms of her placing her priorities wrongly), but now that I've studied the text a little more, I think I can more confidently say that it might have it's applications to what happened as well:
1)Tongues is not a gift for all believers (cf. 1 Cor 12)
2)Tongues is not useful in building up other believers (cf. 1 Cor 14)
Following (1) and (2), then it follows that within a mission team discussion setting, it shouldn't be your priority to push people without the gift to use it!
I'm not saying that tongues = redundant gift, mind you. I am saying that it isn't the most IMPORTANT gift.
In my scenario, alot of time and effort could have been spent on working through the Bible to make sure we will be preaching God's word faithfully to the villagers; Alot more time could've been spent on praying for one anothers needs and hearing each other out; Alot more time could've been spent on learning one another's weakness so that we would sharpen one another and submit ourselves to the authority of God's word. But instead we have HERESY being preached to 100's of villagers that will not have access to sound teaching anytime soon. I don't understand why you and some of the rest just fail to see this point: The distortion of the gospel is not and CANNOT be the work of the Holy Spirit, it is the work of the devil. And I'm basically saying that the devil can use things like "tongues" that might be something good from God and twist it and corrupt it!
Again, it is completely okay to swallow our ego and say "hmm, maybe what I thought all this while was wrong, maybe I should check with scripture again" and do a study.
Again, I think this article is extremely helpful:
https://bible.org/article/argument-1-corint...2-14#P210_60349It's a walll of text, but you can skip the part where he argues from the greek and go straight to the summary and argument sections for brief arguments. Mind you, it's not some random scholar writing this.