Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Canon EOS Family, DSLR, EOS - V58, The White Paladins' Territory!
|
LegendLee
|
Dec 1 2015, 07:33 PM
|
><3LG3|\|D
|
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Dec 1 2015, 10:00 AM) tarak "Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Lens" SP - Super Performance (Tamron's highest quality lens line) AF - Autofocus XR - Extra Refractive Glass (reduces lens size) Di - Digitally Integrated Design (to reduce ghosting, flare, CA and peripheral light fall-off along with improved resolution) LD - Low-Dispersion lens elements (to reduce chromatic aberration for sharper images) Aspherical - contains aspherical elements (compensates for spherical aberration and distortion, making for better performance with fewer elements (and thus allowing for smaller, lighter lenses) (IF) - Internal Focusing I got that lens for my Nikon system. It's ok for its price. But I don't like the manual focusing ring. Too sensitive haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
adam_lss
|
Dec 2 2015, 08:21 AM
|
7th heaven
|
QUOTE(LegendLee @ Dec 1 2015, 07:33 PM) I got that lens for my Nikon system. It's ok for its price. But I don't like the manual focusing ring. Too sensitive haha. got a used set at 780 bucks with another 6 months warranty, considered ok ma
|
|
|
|
|
|
mingyuyu
|
Dec 2 2015, 08:27 PM
|
B A N N E D
|
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Dec 2 2015, 08:21 AM) got a used set at 780 bucks with another 6 months warranty, considered ok ma  heard a lot of not so good reviews about it, any sample pictures? my previous experience with older generation tamron is good at least (the old 70-200 f2.8).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rice_Owl84
|
Dec 2 2015, 09:53 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Dec 2 2015, 08:27 PM) heard a lot of not so good reviews about it, any sample pictures? my previous experience with older generation tamron is good at least (the old 70-200 f2.8).  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAKLdb4s9HUBased on this video by Christopher Frost. Tamron 28-75 is optically fine. Probably the complaints are about its cheap plastic build, focally starts at 28mm and not 24mm, No image stabilization, Non USD/USM AF, not weather sealed. Its not comparable to a Canon L lens build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LegendLee
|
Dec 2 2015, 11:00 PM
|
><3LG3|\|D
|
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Dec 2 2015, 08:21 AM) got a used set at 780 bucks with another 6 months warranty, considered ok ma  That's a good price I got mine second hand for more. I think it was like RM 800+ for the F mount version. Wide open, it suffers a bit of CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
goldfries
|
Dec 3 2015, 03:51 AM
|
40K Club
|
Not everyone is into fast and accurate AF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
adam_lss
|
Dec 3 2015, 07:54 AM
|
7th heaven
|
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Dec 2 2015, 08:27 PM) heard a lot of not so good reviews about it, any sample pictures? my previous experience with older generation tamron is good at least (the old 70-200 f2.8).  QUOTE(Rice_Owl84 @ Dec 2 2015, 09:53 PM) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAKLdb4s9HUBased on this video by Christopher Frost. Tamron 28-75 is optically fine. Probably the complaints are about its cheap plastic build, focally starts at 28mm and not 24mm, No image stabilization, Non USD/USM AF, not weather sealed. Its not comparable to a Canon L lens build. QUOTE(LegendLee @ Dec 2 2015, 11:00 PM) That's a good price I got mine second hand for more. I think it was like RM 800+ for the F mount version. Wide open, it suffers a bit of CA Looks OK ar...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lego Warfare
|
Dec 3 2015, 10:31 AM
|
|
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Dec 3 2015, 07:54 AM) Looks OK ar...
wah... did you make those?
|
|
|
|
|
|
adam_lss
|
Dec 3 2015, 11:44 AM
|
7th heaven
|
QUOTE(Lego Warfare @ Dec 3 2015, 10:31 AM) wah... did you make those?  Bini did, i just shoot n eat
|
|
|
|
|
|
LegendLee
|
Dec 3 2015, 12:50 PM
|
><3LG3|\|D
|
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Dec 3 2015, 07:54 AM) Looks OK ar...  Well, for larger prints, in high contrast area you can see a little CA. Makes portraits with wide open aperture a little tough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
adam_lss
|
Dec 3 2015, 03:26 PM
|
7th heaven
|
QUOTE(LegendLee @ Dec 3 2015, 12:50 PM) Well, for larger prints, in high contrast area you can see a little CA. Makes portraits with wide open aperture a little tough. Oh? Around what size? I have some A3 deals with photobook..
|
|
|
|
|
|
OhNooy
|
Dec 3 2015, 10:57 PM
|
|
nowadays still good to go with 5D2? Looked at MIR and price around 3k
|
|
|
|
|
|
g88
|
Dec 3 2015, 11:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(OhNooy @ Dec 3 2015, 10:57 PM) nowadays still good to go with 5D2? Looked at MIR and price around 3k good as in what sense ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
vikingw2k
|
Dec 4 2015, 08:01 AM
|
LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
|
QUOTE(OhNooy @ Dec 3 2015, 10:57 PM) nowadays still good to go with 5D2? Looked at MIR and price around 3k If you have the budget and you are into one, by all means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OhNooy
|
Dec 4 2015, 07:49 PM
|
|
QUOTE(g88 @ Dec 3 2015, 11:56 PM) QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Dec 4 2015, 08:01 AM) If you have the budget and you are into one, by all means.  Good means, as 5d3 already in market, will 5d2 specifications too outdated? If not too outdated then is good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rice_Owl84
|
Dec 5 2015, 02:19 AM
|
|
QUOTE(OhNooy @ Dec 4 2015, 07:49 PM) Good means, as 5d3 already in market, will 5d2 specifications too outdated? If not too outdated then is good. Its not outdated in the FF photography area. But its not really the only budget FF in the market. 6D has better ISO performance than 5d2 and not that much more expensive. 2nd hand Sony A7 mark 1 & A7R mark 1 cameras are seen in the market on the cheap too. 2nd hand Nikon D610 is also around that price area too. 2-4K has more choices for decent FF than ever before now. But if you're patient you can wait next year for Canon 5d4 to be released sometime in 2016 and that should knock 5d2 prices cheaper even cheaper than now. But they also rumoring the release of the 6dii also, which would knock the 6D price down too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pengster
|
Dec 5 2015, 03:20 AM
|
|
QUOTE(OhNooy @ Dec 4 2015, 07:49 PM) Good means, as 5d3 already in market, will 5d2 specifications too outdated? If not too outdated then is good. It's still a very capable camera. Of course it won't be the best for action/sports kind of photography but for portraiture, studio, planned wedding, landscape etc it will still deliver the goods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
goldfries
|
Dec 5 2015, 03:29 AM
|
40K Club
|
Eh please la, I use EOS 60D only leh and I can assure you it can take plenty good stuff. EOS 5D2 is way better than EOS 60D.  Even the EOS 5D can take marvellous photos by today's standard. Put it simple la, photographer no use camera no matter how good also no help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
adam_lss
|
Dec 5 2015, 08:16 AM
|
7th heaven
|
QUOTE(OhNooy @ Dec 4 2015, 07:49 PM) Good means, as 5d3 already in market, will 5d2 specifications too outdated? If not too outdated then is good. what do u normally shoot by the way?
|
|
|
|
|
|
mingyuyu
|
Dec 5 2015, 09:57 AM
|
B A N N E D
|
QUOTE(OhNooy @ Dec 4 2015, 07:49 PM) Good means, as 5d3 already in market, will 5d2 specifications too outdated? If not too outdated then is good. technologies alone, the 5d2 is very outdated i would say. a sony a7 mark 1 beats the 5d2 in every aspect, yet being cheaper used.
|
|
|
|
|