Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 36 37 38 39 40 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V60, From A to E mount!

views
     
bai1101
post Sep 4 2014, 08:11 AM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


QUOTE(Ksano @ Sep 4 2014, 01:33 AM)
should have taken in RAW for future tweak.  sweat.gif

user posted image
*
Suhkoi~~~

I try challenge this type of ppicture last few day end terrible ly


Still need try and error
hazril
post Sep 4 2014, 10:46 AM

.: This Is Brazil! :.
*******
Senior Member
3,070 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Damansara



QUOTE(bdrc @ Sep 3 2014, 05:47 PM)
Obviously not, lolz. It is two shots taken at same place, one with subject one without, then a few extra layers to bring out the light and warm colours.

SooC is this by the way:

user posted imageDSC02864 by bdrc, on Flickr

NEX-6 and Vivitar 135mm f/2.8
*
ahh...much better this way bro... thumbup.gif

QUOTE(bai1101 @ Sep 4 2014, 08:10 AM)
Suhkoi~~~

I try challenge this type of ppicture last few day end terrible ly
Still need try and error
*
u need to be in total darkness or nearly total darkness or else it wont work...
Decky
post Sep 4 2014, 12:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,190 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(Ksano @ Sep 4 2014, 01:33 AM)
should have taken in RAW for future tweak.  sweat.gif

user posted image
*
wow this is beautiful! Where was this?
bai1101
post Sep 4 2014, 02:55 PM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


Btw any one here try any m42 manual lens on alpha camera before?

Hand itchy want try tongue.gif
ChinWY
post Sep 4 2014, 03:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
633 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(bai1101 @ Sep 4 2014, 07:55 PM)
Btw any one here try any m42 manual lens on alpha camera before?

Hand itchy want try tongue.gif
*
Alpha as to A6k?

I have a Zeiss Jenna Tessar 50mm f2.8 . Works great but getting the lens setting to home at infinity requires a bit of calibration.. I ignore that .. Now I switch to Contax G Zeiss with autofocus adapter.. much nicer.
bai1101
post Sep 4 2014, 03:10 PM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


QUOTE(ChinWY @ Sep 4 2014, 03:07 PM)
Alpha as to A6k? 

I have a Zeiss Jenna Tessar 50mm f2.8 .  Works great but getting the lens setting to home at infinity requires a bit of calibration.. I ignore that ..  Now I switch to Contax G Zeiss with autofocus adapter.. much nicer.
*
Nope i mean a mount camera like a37/57/77/99
Eiraku
post Sep 4 2014, 03:10 PM

Geeking since 1985!
*******
Senior Member
7,037 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(bai1101 @ Sep 4 2014, 02:55 PM)
Btw any one here try any m42 manual lens on alpha camera before?

Hand itchy want try tongue.gif
*
I have tried M42 lenses with my my old A200 before, specifically the Jup9 2/85. My advice, stick with the bayonet mount MF lenses (ie. everything not M42 or M39) unless you wanna dedicate 1 adapter per each M42 lens.

Why? Once you get the adapter on you'll have a near impossible time trying to get it off the lens.

As for good lenses, Konica/Rikenon and Minolta is good and cheap, though prices should be a bit steeper now thanks to the Nexes and the A7.

I'm having a much better time on the A6k now when it comes to MF though, as I can use my old Nikon glass now (which I couldn't with the A200). These include the Tokina 3.5/17, Mir24m 2/35, Kalienar-5n 2.8/100 and Nikon-S Auto 1.4/50. There's also a Minolta MD 1.4/50 and that old Jup9 (which is still pretty much stuck to an A-mount adapter).

All works fantastic on the A6k, except the Mir which is has fungus a bit and the Minolta which I lost the adapter for (but will buy a replacement as I prefer it to the Nikon-S in terms of bokeh).

Sure, we lose in body stabilization with E-mount bodies but oh well.

This post has been edited by Eiraku: Sep 4 2014, 03:31 PM
TSalbnok
post Sep 4 2014, 03:26 PM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


QUOTE(bai1101 @ Sep 4 2014, 02:55 PM)
Btw any one here try any m42 manual lens on alpha camera before?

Hand itchy want try tongue.gif
*
user posted image
Carl Zeiss Flektogon 35mm F2.4 MC DDR, an M42 lens, on my A700.

user posted image
Focuses to 19cm close. Not sure if it did, in this picture.

user posted image
This was probably at 19cm.

user posted image
Bigger shot showing that Zeiss look.

user posted image
This was the Zenit Industar 61 L/Z 50mm F2.8 Macro. Tiny, tiny lens!

user posted image
I also have a Peleng 8mm F3.5 circular fisheye, originally in T-mount, with an adapter to M42. M42 lenses can be adapted to A mount without using any glass - it's just a plain metal ring, and retains infinity focus.

user posted image
Left to right: Peleng 8mm F3.5 circular fisheye in M42 mount, Minolta 50mm F1.4 (in A-mount), Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0 in M42 mount.

user posted image
Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0, on my A900, I think.

I have to say though, that the era of fun with M42 lenses on A-mount bodies has long passed since we can find auto-focusing variants now for cheap, that have much better optical quality, e.g.:

Peleng 8mm F3.5 - too wide, use Samyang 8mm F3.5 instead
Zenitar 16mm F2.8 - not wide enough on APS-C, use Samyang 8mm F3.5 instead
Any 50mm - the Sony 50mm F1.8 DT SAM focuses closer!
Any 50mm F2.8 macro - the Sony 30mm F2.8 DT SAM is wider for APS-C
Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0 - the Sony 85mm F2.8 is autofocus and sharp wide open
Carl Zeiss 135mm F3.5 - nothing in that range, but 135mm is a bit long for APS-C

Note that I say APS-C because M42 lenses back then were mostly budget options for APS-C users, even though all M42 lenses were full-frame compatible. On FF though, the Peleng/Zenitar/50mm/135mm all make a lot more sense, but by that time you might already afford a better lens.

petrofsky77
post Sep 4 2014, 05:48 PM

Temet nosce
******
Senior Member
1,692 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Neither here nor there



Finally! a dedicated digital MF Zeiss lens for the FF e-mount! Welcoming the new Zeiss Loxia family.

http://blogs.zeiss.com/photo/en/?p=5313

user posted image

This post has been edited by petrofsky77: Sep 4 2014, 05:49 PM
Eiraku
post Sep 4 2014, 06:07 PM

Geeking since 1985!
*******
Senior Member
7,037 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(petrofsky77 @ Sep 4 2014, 05:48 PM)
Finally, a dedicated digital MF Zeiss lens for the FF e-mount! Welcoming the new Zeiss Loxia family.

http://blogs.zeiss.com/photo/en/?p=5313

*
IMHO, they're a tad slow at f2 but at least they're relatively tiny because of it. But, if they're sharp wide open, it wouldn't really matter.

Anyways, I just discovered another awesome feature that my old A200 did not have that the A6k does (and it works pretty darned well too): the pop-up "bounce-able" flash.

user posted image

The room was pretty dark, as it was after all a mushroom cultivation chamber. And yet that tiny pop-up flash does quite well being bounced off the walls and cellings - especially considering I usually only shoot in portrait orientation.

It's not perfect, but for something that comes built-in, I'm pretty impressed.

This post has been edited by Eiraku: Sep 4 2014, 08:33 PM
Ah hao
post Sep 4 2014, 08:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,619 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
anyone know how to turn off the "auto cropping potraits" in gallery ? everytime i take a potraits, it will auto save another copy, a cropped one... so irritating.
vincentlee90
post Sep 4 2014, 08:38 PM

Alpha E-mount user
*****
Senior Member
723 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(Ah hao @ Sep 4 2014, 08:36 PM)
anyone know how to turn off the "auto cropping potraits" in gallery ? everytime i take a potraits, it will auto save another copy, a cropped one... so irritating.
*
go to menu and search auto portrait framing setting and off it
bai1101
post Sep 4 2014, 09:06 PM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


QUOTE(albnok @ Sep 4 2014, 03:26 PM)
user posted image
Carl Zeiss Flektogon 35mm F2.4 MC DDR, an M42 lens, on my A700.

user posted image
Focuses to 19cm close. Not sure if it did, in this picture.

user posted image
This was probably at 19cm.

user posted image
Bigger shot showing that Zeiss look.

user posted image
This was the Zenit Industar 61 L/Z 50mm F2.8 Macro. Tiny, tiny lens!

user posted image
I also have a Peleng 8mm F3.5 circular fisheye, originally in T-mount, with an adapter to M42. M42 lenses can be adapted to A mount without using any glass - it's just a plain metal ring, and retains infinity focus.

user posted image
Left to right: Peleng 8mm F3.5 circular fisheye in M42 mount, Minolta 50mm F1.4 (in A-mount), Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0 in M42 mount.

user posted image
Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0, on my A900, I think.

I have to say though, that the era of fun with M42 lenses on A-mount bodies has long passed since we can find auto-focusing variants now for cheap, that have much better optical quality, e.g.:

Peleng 8mm F3.5 - too wide, use Samyang 8mm F3.5 instead
Zenitar 16mm F2.8 - not wide enough on APS-C, use Samyang 8mm F3.5 instead
Any 50mm - the Sony 50mm F1.8 DT SAM focuses closer!
Any 50mm F2.8 macro - the Sony 30mm F2.8 DT SAM is wider for APS-C
Jupiter-9 85mm F2.0 - the Sony 85mm F2.8 is autofocus and sharp wide open
Carl Zeiss 135mm F3.5 - nothing in that range, but 135mm is a bit long for APS-C

Note that I say APS-C because M42 lenses back then were mostly budget options for APS-C users, even though all M42 lenses were full-frame compatible. On FF though, the Peleng/Zenitar/50mm/135mm all make a lot more sense, but by that time you might already afford a better lens.
*
ic thank for advice smile.gif
Ksano
post Sep 4 2014, 09:09 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
555 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Decky @ Sep 4 2014, 12:27 PM)
wow this is beautiful! Where was this?
*
pulau pemanggil biggrin.gif
themanwithnoname
post Sep 4 2014, 10:23 PM

╭∩╮(︶ε︶メ)╭∩╮
******
Senior Member
1,099 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: ☭ Soviet Sarawak ☭


Hate the brand but love the device. wub.gif wub.gif

user posted image

Can u feel that film look?
nixonyang
post Sep 4 2014, 10:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
757 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(themanwithnoname @ Sep 4 2014, 05:57 AM)
Found one L bracket for those who inquired bout this before...

https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=3252713&hl=
*

rclxms.gif thanks for the find! might considered this, looks alright and affordable but sacrifice battery/SD swapping
Ah hao
post Sep 4 2014, 11:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,619 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(vincentlee90 @ Sep 4 2014, 08:38 PM)
go to menu and search auto portrait framing setting and off it
*
thanks rclxms.gif
SUSAmeiN
post Sep 5 2014, 12:40 AM

★★★★★★★
*******
Senior Member
4,735 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: ★~Starlight~★
QUOTE(themanwithnoname @ Sep 4 2014, 10:23 PM)
Hate the brand but love the device.  wub.gif  wub.gif

user posted image

Can u feel that film look?
*
wow long time no see people take "sago" thumbup.gif
DonDropUrSoap
post Sep 5 2014, 05:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
368 posts

Joined: May 2014
From: Right behind U!!!


QUOTE(Ksano @ Sep 4 2014, 01:33 AM)
should have taken in RAW for future tweak.  sweat.gif

user posted image
*
cantiknya thumbup.gif
bai1101
post Sep 5 2014, 12:28 PM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


Any idea market price of 85mm -f2.8?

Retail 1099

125 Pages « < 36 37 38 39 40 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0362sec    0.59    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:40 PM