QUOTE(Jasoncat @ Jun 11 2014, 04:55 PM)
Attached the layout for Canary Garden for your reference and comments.
QUOTE(Jasoncat @ Jun 11 2014, 04:55 PM)
Attached the layout for Canary Garden for your reference and comments.
CG input.
1. it has a much conventional layout with wet kitchen at rear.
2. the 2nd balcony on first floor may distort the facade
3. one of the room on first floor has no attached toilet
4. family hall on first floor has balcony...good natural lighting and vent
5. No SPAH
6. MBR layout look much spacious but no walk-in wardrobe effect
7. Entrance has nice provision for shoe racks
8. staircase is quite normal but save space.
EM 40x80
1. non conventional layout - wet kitchen by the side in front with utility room and door for direct access from car porch (some said cn bring grocery in)
2. dining hall is located at rear side....facing the patio or green
3. all first room rooms have attached toilets
4. family hall on first floor doesnt have direct sunlight but via the staricase and tall window....and no balcony at this area
5. Double volume effect from the staircase. It does take up more space.
6. SPAH
7. MBR has walk-in wardrobe...making the MBR looks smaller
8. MBR balcony is wider than CG...(I think back in Ecosky, their balcony is at least 5 feet width).
9. Gateless concept...except the greenwith some metal grille and small length of wall. (i think i shown this pix at cluster discussion)...should be similar.
I cant compare the external facade but I can say 40x80 EM facade is top notch...Which part...The side is the best part IMHO with several lines of elongate glass panel (of different length) and pretty much aligned with the stair profile.....
I have yet to look at FH or LH, developer devlierable and exprience, strata title or ind title, overall township planning, what is ummph factor, any other USPs,