QUOTE(jarofclay @ Aug 2 2006, 11:47 PM)
However, I do see a difference in terms of amount of L2 cache. 2.88ghz with 4MB L2 can get lower times compared to a 3ghz ++ 2MB L2 cache E6300. If the E6600 can run at 3-3.3ghz and above, I think 14s is not impossible since every 100MHz increase roughly translates to a second off superPI.
yeah. it's normal to see at same clockspeed, 4mb c2d will beat 2mb c2d with 2secs in PI. few people who owns both conroe and allendale has tested it and most of them have same result.
i guess even my windows is fully format, i can just get extra 1 sec max..
QUOTE(Hyde`fK @ Aug 2 2006, 11:57 PM)
Yea, still yet to see anyone can reach 3.5ghz on air yet. jarofclay should have the nearest answer to it as he owns a E6600, which can easily reach 3.6ghz with 400mhz.
But does E6600 clocks well compared to E6300 right now?
yups. E6600 has better chance to hit 3.5ghz since the multiplier on E6300 is quite low. But for 3.5ghz, i believe is just a matter of time for all allendale user. As for me, I'm always strive to hit max stable oc. I wont rush into finding max clockspeed but just be able to take screenshot

So far max OC for conroe is extra 300mhz over the allendale.