Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
9 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo Overclocking Board, Report your issues/results here.

views
     
irenic
post Jul 31 2006, 01:01 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


1st pic) current most stable : 428x7 @ 2996mhz stock vcore, ram @ ddr1070. dual PI 32m

2nd pic) current highest clock : 450x7 @ 3150mhz 1.35vcore, ram @ ddr900.. super PI 1m & sandra cpu arithmetic

This post has been edited by irenic: Jul 31 2006, 01:24 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
irenic
post Jul 31 2006, 01:41 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


yups @ 2.2vdimm biggrin.gif .. tomorrow i'll get a new ram which i doubt will work better than this ahaks.. but hopefully not worse wink.gif

This post has been edited by irenic: Jul 31 2006, 02:08 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
irenic
post Jul 31 2006, 01:15 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


vmch +0.2v .. i dunno bout the northbridge temp, but my pc also hang last nite when i was running dual prime @ 450x7 with surfing + listening to mp3s..
irenic
post Jul 31 2006, 06:52 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(teohwk @ Jul 31 2006, 05:48 PM)
Why DS3 not suitable for E6600 OC har? I am buying E6600 next week when the stock arrives but still don't know which mobo to use...
*
not so.. bcoz some of this combination prevent e6600 from using 9x multiplier when oc
irenic
post Jul 31 2006, 11:04 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


yups u can lower it down.. but then whats the different from getting e6400? owh the 4mb cache? well it's up to u if u think rm400 is worth the extra 2mb cache biggrin.gif
irenic
post Jul 31 2006, 11:26 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Jul 31 2006, 11:06 PM)
wootz since i getting my X6800 in a months time, time to start discussin with u all tongue.gif
*
nice! where did u order it and how much? thumbup.gif
irenic
post Aug 1 2006, 02:01 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(Hyde`fK @ Aug 1 2006, 12:00 AM)
E6400 is same as E6300 with 2mb cache. Only E6600/E6700/X6800 have 4mb cache. smile.gif
*
i know that. thats why i said, if u wanna run E6600 on ds3, then when oc u need to use 8x since it got problem with 9x (some of them) so it just like u r running E6400 with 4mb cache.. i hope u got my point smile.gif
irenic
post Aug 1 2006, 04:42 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


not just that. but also one of the best so far..
irenic
post Aug 1 2006, 05:36 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Aug 1 2006, 04:44 PM)
hhhmmm u noe, i tot u wud had gone for the X6800:p
u are liek the org kaya of LYN man!
hehe

anyways, back to the board, i still feel asus is doing slightly better, but it needs abit of mods here and there. so i guess thats the turn off,. and the price of course. killer tongue.gif
*
x6800 is way too expensive for me dude.. if i buy that, i have to eat maggi for the rest of the year tongue.gif

btw i was considering between E6400 and E6600, bcoz the extra 2mb cache was really interesting but then when i read review comparing 2mb vs 4mb core 2 duo, the real time difference is too little to make it worth rm400 extra. So i decided to buy E6400 but then no stock. So had to buy E6300 which i am really satisfy now thumbup.gif
irenic
post Aug 1 2006, 06:18 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Aug 1 2006, 05:47 PM)
E6400? Is it because of the extra x8 multi? I think you'd better gone with the E6600 straight away if the extra 2MB is really kickin off
*
hmm well bcoz i rarely buy the lowest proc in each category not bcoz underestimate them but bcoz i like to run stock for 24/7 .. and 1.8ghz looks a bit slow for daily use hehe rolleyes.gif

but it seems like i can run 3ghz for 24/7 with this core 2 duo hehe

neway this is my new ram.. mushkin ddr2 800.

This post has been edited by irenic: Aug 1 2006, 06:22 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
irenic
post Aug 2 2006, 01:09 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


that's great tampoi! seeing u easily getting 20secs with 2.9ghz & ddr830 ram make me eager to format my windows wink.gif
irenic
post Aug 2 2006, 01:24 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


i did that last time. create 7gb partition with a fully tweak win xp.. but now no more space since i have both win xp n vista installed sad.gif
irenic
post Aug 2 2006, 01:33 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


so sayang to uninstall the vista.. hehe it looks very nice biggrin.gif

btw i just looked at my oc database, @ 2.8ghz, ram @ 1000mhz 5-5-5-15 i managed to get 20.437secs in super PI 1m, while @ 2.99ghz, ram @ 1070mhz 5-6-6-15 i managed to get 19.344secs.

now with cpu @ 3.15ghz, ram @ 900mhz 4-5-4-13 i managed to get 18.406secs..

is that mean cpu clockspeed is more important than ram fsb in super PI ?

This post has been edited by irenic: Aug 2 2006, 01:58 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
irenic
post Aug 2 2006, 11:38 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


this shows it all. i dont think my windows is too bad. bcoz different between E6600 and E6300 is 2secs, and thats true in Super PI.
irenic
post Aug 3 2006, 02:04 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(jarofclay @ Aug 2 2006, 11:47 PM)
However, I do see a difference in terms of amount of L2 cache. 2.88ghz with 4MB L2 can get lower times compared to a 3ghz ++ 2MB L2 cache E6300. If the E6600 can run at 3-3.3ghz and above, I think 14s is not impossible since every 100MHz increase roughly translates to a second off superPI.
*
yeah. it's normal to see at same clockspeed, 4mb c2d will beat 2mb c2d with 2secs in PI. few people who owns both conroe and allendale has tested it and most of them have same result.
i guess even my windows is fully format, i can just get extra 1 sec max..


QUOTE(Hyde`fK @ Aug 2 2006, 11:57 PM)
Yea, still yet to see anyone can reach 3.5ghz on air yet. jarofclay should have the nearest answer to it as he owns a E6600, which can easily reach 3.6ghz with 400mhz.

But does E6600 clocks well compared to E6300 right now?
*
yups. E6600 has better chance to hit 3.5ghz since the multiplier on E6300 is quite low. But for 3.5ghz, i believe is just a matter of time for all allendale user. As for me, I'm always strive to hit max stable oc. I wont rush into finding max clockspeed but just be able to take screenshot wink.gif

So far max OC for conroe is extra 300mhz over the allendale.
irenic
post Aug 3 2006, 10:39 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


yeah somehow this c2d is slower during win xp bootup. but in vista, it is much faster.. biggrin.gif
irenic
post Aug 3 2006, 11:26 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


wah.. look-new-case for ur new c2d !! biggrin.gif great job!
irenic
post Aug 4 2006, 02:33 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


i bet both will have same limit. so go for 6600 so u can spend ur money somewhere else..

by the way while i was studying for tomorrow quiz, i ran a continuos benches without reset windows or tweak anything to test stability with the new release bios for gigabyte mobo.

dual super PI (from 1m till 32m) -----> 3dmark03 ------> 3dmark05 ------> 3dmark06 ------> 3dmark01se ------> aquamark .

setting:

E6300 B2 @ 3.15ghz 450x7 1.375vcore (bios), 1.34v (windows)
2x 1gb Mushkin EMS ddr900 5-5-5-15 @ 1.9vdimm
Gigabyte DS4 (bios F3c)
ATi x1900xtx (catalyst 6.7 , stock speed)




Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
irenic
post Aug 4 2006, 02:46 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


first of all, it's better if u post in this thread
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=320359.

anyway regarding ur questions,

1) yeah easytune does reset ur setting everytime u restart the windows.

2) this intel core 2 duo does have EIST, if i not mistaken stands for enhanced intel speedstep tech. during idle, it will slowdown ur clockspeed to save power.

This post has been edited by irenic: Aug 4 2006, 02:47 AM
irenic
post Aug 4 2006, 11:44 AM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Aug 4 2006, 08:39 AM)
well...lets say money is not an issue for this will will u go for????ppl are using quite low fsb on E6700 compare to E6600 as they used the multiplier to boost up the clock...but the one i m buying is not ES version so the multiplier is locked at x10....
*
for me, if money not an issue, i will alwiz go to the highest speed i can buy IF the oc limit is the same. U can try do review based on retail E6700 and E6600 first. It's because i wont run oc speed for daily use. So the higher the default clockspeed is better for me. biggrin.gif
but if u're going to run ur setup @ oc speed 24/7, then go for E6600. Even if money not an issue, it's still a money rite? u wont just throw it away (better give it to me laugh.gif) ahaks j/k.
9x multiplier and 10x multiplier different, ah well i'm sure the 400 fsb limit is more than enuff.. 400x9= 3600ghz..

QUOTE(jarofclay @ Aug 4 2006, 09:40 AM)
The most important thing for this is to have a mobo that can have high MCH voltage so that you could push the FSB to 420 and above. Just for comparison, Intel Bad Axe has upto 1.725V for MCH. Most other boards has upto 1.6++V for MCH voltage IIRC.
*
Jarofclay, do u know whats the default MCH voltage? rite now seems i hit the wall @ 450 fsb in bios. It wont go any further. But i can go up to 500fsb with easytuner 5 (but not stable at all).
this is my voltage setting.

VDIMM +0.4
VPCIE +0.1
VMCH +0.3
VFSB +0.1
VCORE 1.375-1.424 ( all cant go more than 450fsb in bios)

QUOTE(Austin @ Aug 4 2006, 10:51 AM)
ok here's some benchmark results I tested just now...  rclxms.gif

Testbed:
Core2 Duo E6300 SL9SA B2 Stepping
Gigabyte 965-DS4 BIOS F3B
Kingston Value RAM DDR-2 667 2x 1024MB Relabelled Unknown Chip
Radeon X300SE 128MB
MegaRAID 320-2E 512MB Buffer Dual Channel SCSI U320 PCI-E
2x Seagate Cheetah 10K.6 36GB
5x Seagate Cheetah 10K.7 300GB
XG Vigor 500W PSU


Setting:
Vcore 1.3v
VDIMM 2.3v
MCH Voltage +0.3v
FSB Voltage + 0.1v
PCI-E Voltage +0.1v
DIMM Timing CL 5-6-6-16 @ 800MHz
*
wow. do u really need that voltage at 2.8speed. I guess my stepping is good. I no need to up the mch voltage up to 0.3v @ 3ghz..

9 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0446sec    0.81    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:29 PM