Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.24, WE love spiders
|
|
 Apr 11 2014, 08:31 AM
|
 
Senior Member
1,420 posts Joined: Sep 2009  
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Apr 11 2014, 08:16 AM) guess u deleted in-camera then. it works the same way. lets say u shot two shots, then delete the 2nd shot, so , ur camera will make another file of the same name. oh like that also can ar? haha.. later i try and see hehe.. no wonder so fast haisyh. thanks sifu hw u noe la? i guess the lens is a 2470?   |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 08:55 AM
|
Senior Member
762 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Melaka
|
not really care much on the shutter count...just snap only...
|
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 09:40 AM
|
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon
|
zomg Sigma 50mm ART price announce tonight
|
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 10:08 AM
|
Senior Member
1,171 posts Joined: Oct 2010
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 10 2014, 09:34 PM) Digitalmall? Thanks. How about Lowyat? There are a couple of large shops down there where you at least get to try the bags out and see whether they suit you or not  After that, if you want, can buy online haha   |
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 10:39 AM
|
 
Elite
24,193 posts Joined: Feb 2010 From: Perak
|
QUOTE(wkwong91 @ Apr 11 2014, 10:08 AM) Thanks. How about Lowyat? Long time didn't visit lowyat plaza already haha, can't really comment  |
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 01:38 PM
|
All Stars
14,242 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: JAVABUS
|
QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Apr 11 2014, 09:40 AM) zomg Sigma 50mm ART price announce tonight performances matches the otus,but at one sixth of its price.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 01:55 PM
|
Junior Member
75 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 10 2014, 05:04 PM) Nikon's mirrorless systems are not that good when compared to competitors So if you want to stick to Nikon, DSLRs are still the better pick  Mirrorless cameras, as the name suggest, lacks the mirror that allows you to see what you will be photographing through the lens- they lack the optical viewfinder, and thanks to that, they can be designed to be much smaller and more portable  Of course, smaller = more portable but less ergonomic So it depends on what you really want most mirrorless systems nowadays are quite affordable, and uses similar sensors (go for the ones with APS-C and not m43) as those in DSLRs.If portability is important to you - mirrorless If ergnomics (dials and button layouts) - DSLR just my 2 cents~ QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Apr 10 2014, 05:32 PM) not really true Thanks for all your inputs. Will look around and test it out before really committing to one some higher end mirrorless have quite many custom buttons that allow users to pick a specific function for them. thus it will offer more direct access compared to dslr. the main advantages of dslr I can see compared to mirrorless is the phase detection, weather sealing/ ruggedness and also the choices of lenses (not really matter if you just shoot specific thing, not everyone buy every single lenses of a system anyways). Really appreciate the stuffs shared. Thank you once again  This post has been edited by sway: Apr 11 2014, 01:56 PM |
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 02:59 PM
|
Junior Member
333 posts Joined: May 2010
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 10 2014, 09:03 PM) All PP wow.. nice But mostly changing the highlights/shadows rather than colours  seem the light there is soft... here even 6pm also the sun is hard... |
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 09:25 PM
|
|
Elite
24,193 posts Joined: Feb 2010 From: Perak
|
QUOTE(slowkancil @ Apr 11 2014, 02:59 PM) wow.. nice Yeah, not much sun over there during my trip, weather's mostly cloudy and cool seem the light there is soft... here even 6pm also the sun is hard...  I love your editing a whole lot more man, the most recent one with the sand-playing lol, not sure when I can reach that level |
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 09:52 PM
|
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Apr 11 2014, 08:16 AM) guess u deleted in-camera then. it works the same way. lets say u shot two shots, then delete the 2nd shot, so , ur camera will make another file of the same name. Lens should be 24-105. 24-70 no IS switch and 24-70 IS is shorter.hw u noe la? i guess the lens is a 2470? |
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 09:55 PM
|
|
Elite
24,193 posts Joined: Feb 2010 From: Perak
|
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Apr 11 2014, 09:52 PM) Lens should be 24-105. 24-70 no IS switch and 24-70 IS is shorter. Sharp eyes haha, I couldn't tell except that its a big lens |
|
|
Apr 11 2014, 10:52 PM
|
Senior Member
1,258 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: /k/
|
Guys, i am being offerd Rm1.5k for
Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED-IF AF-S DX 1 year + unit.. everything seems okay... Is the price reasonable? |
|
|
Apr 12 2014, 12:24 AM
|
|
Junior Member
333 posts Joined: May 2010
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 11 2014, 09:25 PM) Yeah, not much sun over there during my trip, weather's mostly cloudy and cool haha... im actually not really good at editing...I love your editing a whole lot more man, the most recent one with the sand-playing lol, not sure when I can reach that level that pict... just convert from raw and sharpening (unsharp mask) but... it was done using a beauty dish... |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 12 2014, 12:24 AM
|
|
Junior Member
333 posts Joined: May 2010
|
QUOTE(Darkripper @ Apr 11 2014, 10:52 PM) Guys, i am being offerd Rm1.5k for go for it bro... 1.5k seems cheap..Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED-IF AF-S DX 1 year + unit.. everything seems okay... Is the price reasonable? owner upgrading to FF? This post has been edited by slowkancil: Apr 12 2014, 12:25 AM |
|
|
Apr 12 2014, 08:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,258 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: /k/
|
QUOTE(slowkancil @ Apr 12 2014, 12:24 AM) go for it bro... 1.5k seems cheap.. Totally no idea... Kinda sked when he told me the price..owner upgrading to FF? Hope the lens is fine |
|
|
Apr 12 2014, 02:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(Darkripper @ Apr 11 2014, 10:52 PM) Guys, i am being offerd Rm1.5k for It's cheap, but do check nicely. Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED-IF AF-S DX 1 year + unit.. everything seems okay... Is the price reasonable? YL selling second hand > RM2K |
|
|
Apr 12 2014, 03:02 PM
|
|
Junior Member
260 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Past: Southampton, Present: Shah Alam
|
any suggestion for 3rd party flash? Nikon flashlight quite pricey.
|
|
|
Apr 12 2014, 03:06 PM
|
|
Junior Member
333 posts Joined: May 2010
|
QUOTE(Max_07s @ Apr 12 2014, 03:02 PM) any suggestion for 3rd party flash? Nikon flashlight quite pricey. i used to bought nissin...still haved the flash as backup (im a strobist and used alot of flash) but my recommendation is still sb-700 or sb-800 as first flash... mainly because of ttl accuracy, flash cycle speed, battery drainage and overall built quality |
|
|
Apr 12 2014, 03:15 PM
|
|
Junior Member
260 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Past: Southampton, Present: Shah Alam
|
QUOTE(slowkancil @ Apr 12 2014, 07:06 AM) i used to bought nissin... how about YN-568 EX II yong nuo?still haved the flash as backup (im a strobist and used alot of flash) but my recommendation is still sb-700 or sb-800 as first flash... mainly because of ttl accuracy, flash cycle speed, battery drainage and overall built quality |
|
|
Apr 12 2014, 03:40 PM
|
|
Junior Member
333 posts Joined: May 2010
|
QUOTE(Max_07s @ Apr 12 2014, 03:15 PM) how about YN-568 EX II yong nuo? hmm.. seem the built quality is ok..dont have exact experience using the 568, but i used 560-mk2 just the cycle and battery drainage is on the bad side.. but for the price and the power, its a good flash (yn 560 though) |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0346sec
 0.37
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 04:30 AM |
Quote