QUOTE(jolokia @ Feb 2 2014, 02:03 PM)
Ah ha ! Now ur statement is contradict with the previous statement that 1.6 & 1.8 no differences.
Grand Livina is a MPV@Wagon, the main purpose r for those who need a 5+2 vehicle, aka those who need to fetch extra passenger but not on regular basis, therefore 1.6 is more that adequate though 1.8 is also available.
Nissan fuel economy test is conduct by various renowned auto website include AW, Paultan.org & CBT therefore the results is reliable.
U went for Kosong specs EX because even base on max 9 years loan you r not qualify for SX loan.
N brand r renowned for its ultra reliable engine that why it is the preferred brand for long distance Taxi (light blue taxi), this year TC will launch Altima & New Sylphy aka US Sentra with latest dual VVT tech.
The record in AW clearly shows U R the one who started NASA for NAZA as u afraid getting disciplinary/legal action.
Few months ago u dare to says Forte can sell good price ..lol now 4 years Forte 2.0 aleady loss 50% resales value..wakakaka
Don't try to twist and turn with my comment. The Lavina 1.6 doesn't have VVT therefore it returns poor FC. Aren't you forgetting that you infected the local journalists back then? Because of that, they still have to stick to fake report in their article today. AW, Paultan & CBT are nothing more than thrash, today, they would be more careful and stick to facts hoping that people will forget what they said back then. Grand Livina is a MPV@Wagon, the main purpose r for those who need a 5+2 vehicle, aka those who need to fetch extra passenger but not on regular basis, therefore 1.6 is more that adequate though 1.8 is also available.
Nissan fuel economy test is conduct by various renowned auto website include AW, Paultan.org & CBT therefore the results is reliable.
U went for Kosong specs EX because even base on max 9 years loan you r not qualify for SX loan.
N brand r renowned for its ultra reliable engine that why it is the preferred brand for long distance Taxi (light blue taxi), this year TC will launch Altima & New Sylphy aka US Sentra with latest dual VVT tech.
The record in AW clearly shows U R the one who started NASA for NAZA as u afraid getting disciplinary/legal action.
Few months ago u dare to says Forte can sell good price ..lol now 4 years Forte 2.0 aleady loss 50% resales value..wakakaka
That Forte EX so cheap, I only took short term loan. It's confirmed reliable and durable despite not much attention paid to it, still good as new. The ultra reliable engine blue taxi in Sonata NF already proven trouble free. The Sylphy & Cefiro are proven to be junk that are not so practical compared to Sonata NF.
Still bragging of bringing in new Altima and US Sentra? Lol!! Your Japanese principal don't even want to give you the plant as you ruined things up with earlier models until almost drag them down. If you want to sell new Altima, wait until Nissan setup plant in Thailand. As for US Sentra, why haven't you brought in to sell yet? The new Altis 2014 already here before you? Is it because you don't get to maximize max profit if you take CBU from Thailand?
Record in AW shows you and your earlier username Popcorn used NAZAK first and then changed to NASA.
Forte RV still ok, it has stronger RV than N-brand now based on actual price paid by customers. Check trade in RV at Toyota, the used car dealer gave better value to Forte than Latio from same year. Forte 2.0L RV still ok compared to Sylphy. Sylphy is now "Cold Door" car together with Latio labelled by used car dealers that are difficult to sell with poor demand. Even your sales has been all time low.
Feb 11 2014, 04:05 PM

Quote
0.0301sec
0.49
5 queries
GZIP Disabled