Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

491 Pages « < 401 402 403 404 405 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Car Tint Advice - V2, Raytech, Vkool, Huper Optic, 3M or .....

views
     
ayamxxx
post Feb 22 2023, 09:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,059 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(hakmuiguai @ Feb 17 2023, 04:45 PM)
for budget around 1k I'm considering these few quotations
Raytech AC IRR=65%, TSER=40%  RM750
Raytech FC IRR=75%, TSER=48%  RM1150
Rhinepro black rescue IRR=90%, TSER=40% RM980

any advice on which is better? i'm confused which number to look at for heat rejection.
*
Why the last had high IRR but kinda mid spec TSER?
DraGGarD
post Feb 23 2023, 12:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
102 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: MMU, Cyberjaya



Done my full car with 3M Crystalline with the great help from @dog999, good workmanship and top notch service. kudos
hakmuiguai P
post Feb 23 2023, 03:48 PM

New Member
*
Probation
13 posts

Joined: Jan 2023
QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Feb 22 2023, 09:13 AM)
Why the last had high IRR but kinda mid spec TSER?
*
that's why im confused, the dealer told me tser just a figure, they don't have meter to test it, but IRR they can test for you
Eterman
post Feb 23 2023, 04:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Feb 22 2023, 09:13 AM)
Why the last had high IRR but kinda mid spec TSER?
*
wanna give my 2 cents, going by logic, if wrong, i will edit/remove smile.gif :

lets assume the numbers are correct, then there may be few possibilities:

1. the high IRR applies only to a narrow range within the infrared spectrum, the other IR spectrum may have weak rejection, therefore TSER is lower than expected.

2. high IRR covers wide range of infrared spectrum, but rejection of other heat components of "light" is weak, as TSER includes UV, visible light and infrared (and all of these cause heat too), therefore TSER is lower than expected.

3. IRR is high, if the film is absorptive type, most of the IR is absorbed, over a period of time, there is a cumulative of heat energy from prolonged intense IR absorption that film became a secondary source of heat, therefore TSER is lower than expected.

This post has been edited by Eterman: Feb 23 2023, 04:25 PM
ayamxxx
post Feb 23 2023, 04:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,059 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(Eterman @ Feb 23 2023, 04:21 PM)
wanna give my 2 cents, going by logic, if wrong, i will edit/remove  smile.gif :

lets assume the numbers are correct, then there may be few possibilities:

1. the high IRR applies only to a narrow range within the infrared spectrum, the other IR spectrum may have weak rejection, therefore TSER is lower than expected.

2. high IRR covers wide range of infrared spectrum, but rejection of other heat components of "light" is weak, as TSER includes UV, visible light and infrared (and all of these cause heat too), therefore TSER is lower than expected.

3. IRR is high, if the film is absorptive type, most of the IR is absorbed, over a period of time, there is a cumulative of heat energy from prolonged intense IR absorption that film became a secondary source of heat, therefore TSER is lower than expected.
*
had 2 car with IRR 90% and 99%, the 90% IRR, the VLT follow JPJ spec, and even this, had a much bigger TSER.
dog999
post Feb 24 2023, 08:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
377 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(DraGGarD @ Feb 23 2023, 12:38 PM)
Done my full car with 3M Crystalline with the great help from @dog999, good workmanship and top notch service. kudos
*
Thank you so much for your support . Enjoy ur cool ride bro. biggrin.gif
alesi616
post Feb 24 2023, 11:45 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
810 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
anyone heard about V-Zion tint? Recently my friend buy Kia Carnival which has an original tint (brand name V-Zion). He wanted to darken the tint for rear windows and rear windscreen to avoid prying eye on the car boot, and was offered 2 choice:

1) V-Zion, add-on darken layer, to VLT 20% (for rear windscreen, and rear windows), warranty 5 years.
2) Raytech, add-on darken layer on existing V-Zion tint, VLT 20% (for rear windscreen, and rear windows), warranty only 3 years.

Any comments of which choice to take? Price about the same but Raytech have more IRR/TSER data showed in their website. V-Zion has limited info.

Is it ok to darken the windows & rear windscreen to VLT 20% and not affecting visibility at night? The front windscreen and driver/front passenger tint will remain original tint (VLT 70%).
j88j
post Feb 25 2023, 04:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
439 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Rhinepro Black Beauty OK?
Anyone using RhinePro
j88j
post Feb 25 2023, 04:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
439 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Rhinepro Black Beauty OK?
Anyone using RhinePro
alesi616
post Feb 25 2023, 06:04 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
810 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
any one using ice-u tint? how is the performance?
Coconut1980
post Feb 25 2023, 07:49 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
19 posts

Joined: Mar 2018
QUOTE(dog999 @ Mar 5 2022, 05:07 PM)
Okay thanks for enquiry
*

Please pm for voxy
Thanks
19 Degree South
post Feb 25 2023, 10:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,682 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
getting more and more brands of tints surfaced.
tctham
post Feb 26 2023, 01:47 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
653 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(j88j @ Feb 25 2023, 04:01 PM)
Rhinepro Black Beauty OK?
Anyone using RhinePro
*
Used rhinepro for almost 4 years. Cheap (got mine done for less than 1k)

Pros:
Good heat rejection, felt really cooling
My shop got quite good workmanship, no bubbles up till now
Cheap

Cons:
The 70vlt had a blue tint that i didn't like. Obstruct visibility during rain. I went back to shop, they say they never had anyone complain this issue. But nevertheless willing to redo for me. Since they say tint no issue, i also dun doubt them, i jz retint to 50%vlt (since all other windows are fine.) Not jpj compliant but ok la, better than poor visibility during rain (strong light dispersion)
Color fade really quickly. Mine is almost illegal type of dark esp at night. In 2 years, faded a lot. In 4 years, almost completely gone d
Heat rejection also will decrease, but not by alot. Maybe about 20-30% after 4 years.

ry8128
post Feb 26 2023, 02:34 PM

♣Just a noob♣
*******
Senior Member
3,642 posts

Joined: Jul 2014


QUOTE(hakmuiguai @ Feb 17 2023, 04:45 PM)
for budget around 1k I'm considering these few quotations
Raytech AC IRR=65%, TSER=40%  RM750
Raytech FC IRR=75%, TSER=48%  RM1150
Rhinepro black rescue IRR=90%, TSER=40% RM980

any advice on which is better? i'm confused which number to look at for heat rejection.
*
QUOTE(alesi616 @ Feb 24 2023, 11:45 AM)
anyone heard about V-Zion tint? Recently my friend buy Kia Carnival which has an original tint (brand name V-Zion). He wanted to darken the tint for rear windows and rear windscreen to avoid prying eye on the car boot, and was offered 2 choice:

1)  V-Zion, add-on darken layer, to VLT 20% (for rear windscreen, and rear windows), warranty 5 years.
2) Raytech, add-on darken layer on existing V-Zion tint, VLT 20% (for rear windscreen, and rear windows), warranty only 3 years.

Any comments of which choice to take? Price about the same but Raytech have more IRR/TSER data showed in their website. V-Zion has limited info.

Is it ok to darken the windows & rear windscreen to VLT 20% and not affecting visibility at night? The front windscreen and driver/front passenger tint will remain original tint (VLT 70%).
*
Tser is just a figure on paper only. Check my siggy for raytech review
ayamxxx
post Feb 26 2023, 06:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,059 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(tctham @ Feb 26 2023, 01:47 PM)
Used rhinepro for almost 4 years. Cheap (got mine done for less than 1k)

Pros:
Good heat rejection, felt really cooling
My shop got quite good workmanship, no bubbles up till now
Cheap

Cons:
The 70vlt had a blue tint that i didn't like. Obstruct visibility during rain. I went back to shop, they say they never had anyone complain this issue. But nevertheless willing to redo for me. Since they say tint no issue, i also dun doubt them, i jz retint to 50%vlt (since all other windows are fine.) Not jpj compliant but ok la, better than poor visibility during rain (strong light dispersion)
Color fade really quickly. Mine is almost illegal type of dark esp at night. In 2 years, faded a lot. In 4 years, almost completely gone d
Heat rejection also will decrease, but not by alot. Maybe about 20-30% after 4 years.
*
Faded? The heat rejection sure also like this
tctham
post Feb 26 2023, 07:07 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
653 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Feb 26 2023, 06:35 PM)
Faded? The heat rejection sure also like this
*
Yep but the heat rejection loss not that bad la. It's pretty clear now in terms of tint shade, but heat rejection wise definitely not as bad as not having tint. That I can confirm because my car had no tint initially. I drove without tint for a year and I remember vividly how hot the car is without tint. The cabin is never cool, only local areas where the aircond is blowing. When open door, the gust from outside is cooler. And the sunrays, it burns the skin. Am not feeling all of these currently.
Angry Clerk
post Feb 26 2023, 07:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
253 posts

Joined: Jul 2021
QUOTE(tctham @ Feb 26 2023, 01:47 PM)
Used rhinepro for almost 4 years. Cheap (got mine done for less than 1k)

Pros:
Good heat rejection, felt really cooling
My shop got quite good workmanship, no bubbles up till now
Cheap

Cons:
The 70vlt had a blue tint that i didn't like. Obstruct visibility during rain. I went back to shop, they say they never had anyone complain this issue. But nevertheless willing to redo for me. Since they say tint no issue, i also dun doubt them, i jz retint to 50%vlt (since all other windows are fine.) Not jpj compliant but ok la, better than poor visibility during rain (strong light dispersion)
Color fade really quickly. Mine is almost illegal type of dark esp at night. In 2 years, faded a lot. In 4 years, almost completely gone d
Heat rejection also will decrease, but not by alot. Maybe about 20-30% after 4 years.
*
Wa... Rhinepro also fade so fast... they selling near to 2K leh
19 Degree South
post Feb 26 2023, 11:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,682 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(j88j @ Feb 25 2023, 04:01 PM)
Rhinepro Black Beauty OK?
Anyone using RhinePro
*
what brand is this? naber heard before?
j88j
post Feb 27 2023, 01:11 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
439 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(tctham @ Feb 26 2023, 01:47 PM)
Used rhinepro for almost 4 years. Cheap (got mine done for less than 1k)

Pros:
Good heat rejection, felt really cooling
My shop got quite good workmanship, no bubbles up till now
Cheap

Cons:
The 70vlt had a blue tint that i didn't like. Obstruct visibility during rain. I went back to shop, they say they never had anyone complain this issue. But nevertheless willing to redo for me. Since they say tint no issue, i also dun doubt them, i jz retint to 50%vlt (since all other windows are fine.) Not jpj compliant but ok la, better than poor visibility during rain (strong light dispersion)
Color fade really quickly. Mine is almost illegal type of dark esp at night. In 2 years, faded a lot. In 4 years, almost completely gone d
Heat rejection also will decrease, but not by alot. Maybe about 20-30% after 4 years.
*
Thx for review, u using which series? Black beauty or Black Rescue
tctham
post Feb 27 2023, 01:24 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
653 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(j88j @ Feb 27 2023, 01:11 AM)
Thx for review, u using which series? Black beauty or Black Rescue
*
Black beauty

491 Pages « < 401 402 403 404 405 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0228sec    0.51    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 05:03 PM