-removed-
This post has been edited by -br0k3n-: Nov 30 2013, 11:21 PM
Unifi TMnet Streamyx/Unifi & IPv6, Now live!
Unifi TMnet Streamyx/Unifi & IPv6, Now live!
|
|
Nov 30 2013, 11:15 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
167 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
-removed-
This post has been edited by -br0k3n-: Nov 30 2013, 11:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2013, 11:49 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#502
|
|
Elite
1,235 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: kuala lipis |
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Nov 30 2013, 10:30 PM) and thus my claim earlier ipv6 latency is good for gaming is proved true no one believes your claimlah. it's useless.......small print: server needs to be ipv6 supported it's just a case of tm adjusting/not adjusting ipv6 traffic for unifi subs. you do traceroute lah, sure different routing path for ipv6. |
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 01:02 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#503
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,451 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 15 2017, 10:48 AM |
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 02:08 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#504
|
|
VIP
6,008 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Nov 29 2013, 08:54 AM) oh i get it. If your limited by having only 1 router cause of it, thats a big issue :/ You don't need subnets in those scenarios. Just bridge everything into one single ethernet segment and use the same /64 prefix, and call it a day. Why complicate your network unnecessarily? KISS applies here.cause take for example the living where your iptv is; to connect there you need either a homeplug...... or..... use wireless e.g. setting up a client router to do wireless to your main router. yeah hm |
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 02:13 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#505
|
|
VIP
6,008 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Dec 1 2013, 01:02 AM) when did you suddenly talk for every1 ? That's because you took prasys's single account and called it proof without analyzing or justifying WHY it is faster.prasys test prove there is difference That's faith, not science. You deserved to be called out on it. |
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 02:16 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#506
|
|
VIP
6,008 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
More info about TM broadband IPv6:
1) Will TM provide prefixes bigger than /64? For home/business customers. Yes, we do for business package. 2) For home customers, will there be an option for static IPv6 prefix? At the moment no. 3) Currently, how do I find out whether my BRAS is IPv6-enabled? Besides trying to enable it on my router. The information is probably not made public. Some BRAS serve multiple exchanges and not all are disabled so need to go down to details. Best for them to send a query to the callcenter and have them feedback. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 02:37 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#507
|
|
VIP
6,008 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Eoma @ Nov 28 2013, 11:32 PM) To give context to this statement, here's an excerpt from RFC 5375:QUOTE 3. Subnet Prefix Considerations An important part of an IPv4 addressing plan is deciding the length of each subnet prefix. Unlike in IPv4, the IPv6 addressing architecture [RFC4291] specifies that all subnets using Globally Unique Addresses and ULAs always have the same prefix length of 64 bits. (This also applies to the deprecated 6bone and site-local addresses.) The only exception to this rule are special addresses starting with the binary value 000, such as IPv4-compatible IPv6 addresses. These exceptions are largely beyond the scope of this document. Using a subnet prefix length other than a /64 will break many features of IPv6, including Neighbor Discovery (ND), Secure Neighbor Discovery (SEND) [RFC3971], privacy extensions [RFC4941], parts of Mobile IPv6 [RFC4866], Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) with Embedded-RP [RFC3956], and Site Multihoming by IPv6 Intermediation (SHIM6) [SHIM6], among others. A number of other features currently in development, or being proposed, also rely on /64 subnet prefixes. Nevertheless, many IPv6 implementations do not prevent the administrator from configuring a subnet prefix length shorter or longer than 64 bits. Using subnet prefixes shorter than /64 would rarely be useful; see Appendix B.1 for discussion. However, some network administrators have used prefixes longer than /64 for links connecting routers, usually just two routers on a point-to-point link. On links where all the addresses are assigned by manual configuration, and all nodes on the link are routers (not end hosts) that are known by the network, administrators do not need any of the IPv6 features that rely on /64 subnet prefixes, this can work. Using subnet prefixes longer than /64 is not recommended for general use, and using them for links containing end hosts would be an especially bad idea, as it is difficult to predict what IPv6 features the hosts will use in the future. Appendix B.2 describes some practical considerations that need to be taken into account when using prefixes longer than /64 in limited cases. In particular, a number of IPv6 features use interface identifiers that have a special form (such as a certain fixed value in some bit positions). When using prefixes longer than /64, it is prudent to avoid certain subnet prefix values so that nodes who assume that the prefix is /64 will not incorrectly identify the addresses in that subnet as having a special form. Appendix B.2 describes the subnet prefix values that are currently believed to be potentially problematic; however, the list is not exhaustive and can be expected to grow in the future. Using /64 subnets is strongly recommended, also for links connecting only routers. A deployment compliant with the current IPv6 specifications cannot use other prefix lengths. However, the V6OPS WG believes that despite the drawbacks (and a potentially expensive network redesign, if IPv6 features relying on /64 subnets are needed in the future), some networks administrators will use prefixes longer than /64. |
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 05:34 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#508
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
75 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
So in other words, a /64 is the norm that everyone gets, and /48, /56 or /60 are for 'special' cases/scenarios..
|
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 11:16 AM
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ihsan @ Nov 30 2013, 11:49 PM) no one believes your claimlah. it's useless. Indeed , you can't compare apples and oranges..for iPV6 it is taking a different route...it's just a case of tm adjusting/not adjusting ipv6 traffic for unifi subs. you do traceroute lah, sure different routing path for ipv6. CODE pradeeshs-imac:~ Pradeesh$ traceroute 12.129.223.44 traceroute to 12.129.223.44 (12.129.223.44), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 my.router (192.168.1.1) 1.742 ms 1.250 ms 1.205 ms 2 175.137.110.206 (175.137.110.206) 4.203 ms 175.137.110.254 (175.137.110.254) 17.275 ms 175.137.110.194 (175.137.110.194) 4.610 ms 3 175.137.110.241 (175.137.110.241) 4.224 ms 3.339 ms 7.337 ms 4 10.55.37.60 (10.55.37.60) 5.457 ms 10.55.32.148 (10.55.32.148) 6.107 ms 6.311 ms 5 las-b3-link.telia.net (62.115.32.5) 198.757 ms 197.683 ms 224.395 ms 6 las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.134.252) 245.603 ms las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.137.58) 200.834 ms las-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.131.84) 355.063 ms 7 att-ic-153025-las-bb1.c.telia.net (80.239.193.214) 202.299 ms 204.275 ms 201.089 ms 8 cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.129.98) 204.417 ms 203.985 ms 203.976 ms 9 gar29.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.129.241) 209.944 ms 199.163 ms 199.438 ms 10 12-122-254-238.attens.net (12.122.254.238) 201.577 ms 201.933 ms 202.591 ms 11 mdf001c7613r0004-gig-10-1.lax1.attens.net (12.129.193.250) 201.706 ms mdf001c7613r0002.lax1.attens.net (206.16.68.54) 186.361 ms 206.16.68.46 (206.16.68.46) 185.167 ms 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * *^C CODE pradeeshs-imac:~ Pradeesh$ tracerout6 2620:10b:9006:600:dad3:85ff:fed9:ce24 -bash: tracerout6: command not found pradeeshs-imac:~ Pradeesh$ traceroute6 2620:10b:9006:600:dad3:85ff:fed9:ce24 traceroute6 to 2620:10b:9006:600:dad3:85ff:fed9:ce24 (2620:10b:9006:600:dad3:85ff:fed9:ce24) from 2001:e68:5418:3795:7476:1ec7:29dc:ca11, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets 1 2001:e68:5418:3795:ca60:ff:fe95:f71 1.441 ms 1.246 ms 1.205 ms 2 * * * 3 2001:e68:5000::102 4.212 ms 4.558 ms 7.315 ms 4 fd7d:2c4f:bc9c::10:233:199:1 13.233 ms 90.770 ms 26.411 ms 5 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.sin1.he.net 12.819 ms 12.555 ms 17.210 ms 6 10gigabitethernet6-1.core1.hkg1.he.net 48.754 ms 45.522 ms 42.081 ms 7 * * 10gigabitethernet3-1.core1.tyo1.he.net 98.718 ms 8 10gigabitethernet15-2.core1.lax2.he.net 264.954 ms 259.495 ms 273.366 ms 9 att-internet4-as7018.10gigabitethernet5-2.core1.lax2.he.net 200.528 ms 196.821 ms 205.361 ms 10 la2ca21crs.ipv6.att.net 205.518 ms 203.318 ms 203.059 ms 11 phmaz22crs.ipv6.att.net 202.303 ms 201.864 ms 203.971 ms 12 phmaz404me3.ipv6.att.net 205.044 ms 199.919 ms 213.931 ms 13 * * * 14 2001:1890:e000:809::1005:d001 213.932 ms 199.424 ms 199.567 ms 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * ^C Looks like for iPV4 , it gets routed to Telia (Europe) before going to America (AT&T) , wheres for IPV6 , it seems to be routing through he.net before reaching to AT&T Servers. Well IPV6 in this case seems to be offering a better route to US compared to iPV4 |
|
|
Dec 1 2013, 11:19 AM
|
|
VIP
12,925 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(rogue @ Dec 1 2013, 05:34 AM) So in other words, a /64 is the norm that everyone gets, and /48, /56 or /60 are for 'special' cases/scenarios.. Yes that's correctAn example one may want o use /56 , is basically if you want to separate servers and client out , so you use different subnet , one for 'servers' and one for the 'clients'. This is an example. |
|
|
Dec 2 2013, 01:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,865 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: XBOX Live |
so anyone had luck configuring IPv6 on pfSense ?
|
|
|
Dec 2 2013, 03:31 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#512
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
75 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(calvin @ Dec 2 2013, 01:57 PM) Hi,I would first try connecting a laptop/pc directly to your BTU and dial PPPoE and see if you can get an IPv6 address just to confirm IPv6 is supported in your area. If you have it, then you could try this in PfSense: QUOTE Select dhcp6 on the WAN, set the prefix delegation size to 64 bits. Go to the LAN interface, for IPv6 select "Track Interface". Set it to interface "WAN" and the network prefix is always 0 for you. Quote above taken from this link. The link above is base on Comcast IPv6 setup but should give you a rough idea for your setup. One common problem ppl having in that forum is that they get IPv6 on both WAN/LAN, but no IPv6 default route(IPv6 gateway). So if this happens to you, maybe you need to script your way into adding an IPv6 default route after WAN is established. Hope this helps.. |
|
|
Dec 2 2013, 05:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
735 posts Joined: Sep 2013 From: IYD ~ In Your Dream |
testing office ipv6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2013, 08:25 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#514
|
|
Staff
12,089 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Malaysia |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 01:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,451 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 15 2017, 10:49 AM |
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 01:38 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#516
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,451 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 15 2017, 10:50 AM |
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 02:37 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#517
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
75 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
Hello,
For MTU, I'm using OpenWRT Backfire and it's currently just using the default MTU 1492 on PPPoE iface with no disconnects or stability issues so far. For stability I fired up XChat and connect to 2 different IPv6 IRC networks without joining any channels. Just keeping the status window open to see if either networks disconnect. So far their still connected. I use IRC as a test to see how stable TM IPv6 is coz IRC is real time.. QUOTE Or you can script it for when router boots up, if you know how (i don't). step2 I suspect i needed to disable, then enable back my desktop pcs ethernet port. So i did that, then ran the test at http://ipv6test.google.com/ http://test-ipv6.com/ Or maybe you can lower your lease time to something between 600-900..that way it will expire the old lease quickly automatically. I have mine set to 1800 in dhcp6s and radvd, both preferred and max lifetime. Ofcourse this is only during testing periods. Once your IPv6 is stable enough, you should increase back the lease time. |
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 02:55 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#518
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,451 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 15 2017, 10:50 AM |
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 03:10 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#519
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
75 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE i'm not quite sure how to do that. For the lease setting, there should be something like in IPv4 dhcp for you to specify the lease time. Your router's default could be somewhere between 3600 - 7200 or 1 day. QUOTE also with the help of a friend, we found that my internet connection for ipv6 not sure why, also haven't found a fix for it yet. But if i when i reboot my router and wait 10-15mins then i can get around this problem. it's annoying but, i have to live with it I get the same thing too. It assign's IPv6 to the WAN interface roughly 5-10mins later. I think it has to do with the current dhcpv6 lease time on the WAN side. If your connection disconnects before the lease expires, then it has to wait for that lease to expire before handling out a new lease. |
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 03:26 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#520
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,451 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 15 2017, 10:50 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0299sec
0.30
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 11:37 AM |